Archive for Ilyse G. Hogue

Abortion group NARAL starts #ProChoiceParents twitter fest

Posted in Abortionist, NARAL with tags , , , , , , , , , on June 15, 2015 by saynsumthn

The other day I blogged about NARAL’s obnoxious tweet, “Being pro-choice *is* fundamentally about *parenting!”

NARAL Prochoice parenting

It followed news that their president, Ilyse Hogue, announced that she was pregnant with twins, and they are now trying to prove that women who support the right to kill a child in the womb are also “good parents.”

Pregnant

To do this they have created the hashtag #ProchoiceParents.

NARAL Prochoice parent

Capture

Capture2

Capture3

They even posted this pic of abortionist Pratima Gupta – pregnant:

Pratima Gupta

Abortionist Pregnant

Along with a tumblr page where Maureen Shaw writes, “Motherhood strengthens my prochoice resolve!

Capture4

Not to be outdone by Planned Parenthood ex-employee, Jen Levine-Fried, who writes, “I worked for Planned Parenthood for nearly five years, and served on the Board of the Eastern Massachusetts Abortion Fund for six, but nothing strengthened my commitment to being pro-choice like pregnancy and parenting. Pregnancy is HARD, and parenting is even harder. No one should go through either of those things without choosing it.”

Jen Planned Parenthood

To help make this hashtag go viral Saynsumthn offers a few suggestions:

ProChoiceParents

#ProchoiceParents believe in this:

Aborted baby foot

Celebrating being a #prochoiceparent:

Aborted Baby 6

What I will tell my child when she grows up #ProChoiceParents

Here is what #ProChoiceParents believe in:

BabyRowan2

ProChoidceParents

What can you come up with?

The abortion lobby believes that because Ilyse Hogue, President of NARAL has announced that she is pregnant with twins, that it is, “confounding anti-choice activists.”

Well not really.

See, we have always known that the babies the abortion lobby wants killed are NOT their own.

In their warped elitist world – they are the ones “deserving” to have children.

Read more here.

NARAL tweets: Abortion is fundamentally about “Parenting” i.e. Killing is parenting?

Posted in License to breed, NARAL, RH Reality Blog with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on June 12, 2015 by saynsumthn

Naral Pro-choice America is tweeting, “Being pro-choice *is* fundamentally about *parenting!

NARAL Prochoice parenting

The NARAL Tweet takes you to RH Reality Blog’s tumblr page where they posted this:

RH Reality prochoice parenting

They think that because Ilyse Hogue, President of NARAL has announced that she was pregnant with twins, that it is, “confounding anti-choice activists.”

NARAL Pregnant twins

Well not really.

See, we have always known that the babies the abortion lobby wants killed are NOT their own.

In their warped elitist world – they are the ones “deserving” to have children.

After all wasn’t it Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger and other eugenics leaders that she followed, who suggested the government enact a “License to breed?”

guttmachr

In fact, as late as 1970, former Planned Parenthood president Alan Guttmacher called the idea of a limitation of families to only 2 children in America “desirable.” (read about that here)

He endorsed the concept of limiting births by force.

As early as 1966 , in an article in Medical World News Reports, Guttmacher lauded the possibility that coercion will be used to control population, “Each country will have to decide its own form of coercion,” he wrote, “and determine when and how it should be employed. At present the available means are compulsory sterilization and compulsory abortion. Perhaps some day a way of enforcing compulsory birth control will be feasible.

Later, Guttmacher figured out that society would frown on the idea, so he endorsed a plan that he says would work, ABORTION, “If we could get the abortion law liberalized, most of the 750,000 unwanted pregnancies would not lead to babies…”he stated.

LICENSE TO BREED

Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger once wrote that no one should have the right to bear a child and no permit for children shall give a couple the right the have more than one birth, requiring parents to obtain a “license to breed.”

LicensetoParent

In her “A License for Mothers to Have Babies” with the subtitle, “A code to stop the overproduction of children.” Sanger writes:

A marriage license shall in itself give husband and wife only the right to a common household and not the right to parenthood.

Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit for parenthood.

Article 5. Permits for parenthood shall be issued upon application by city, county, or State authorities to married couples , providing the parents are financially able to support the expected child, have the qualifications needed for proper rearing of the child, have no transmissible diseases, and on the woman’s part, no medical indication that maternity is likely to result in death or permanent injury to health.

Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

Hardin AES

The idea of Forced Population Control is not a new concept as I detail here but was opposed by society generally.

In 1970, Guttmacher said it was inadvisable for Planned Parenthood to go public with their ideas to “limit births” because it would essentially cause a public relations backlash among Americans and especially minorities who see this language as genocide and eugenics. Planned Parenthood was knee deep in Eugenics and Guttmacher knew the sensitivity of how the minority black community felt about population control which we have documented before (here) and here.

So, in conclusion, NARAL prez having babies is not a surprise.

What is a shock is that somehow being for the “choice” to kill your baby at any time prior to birth and for any reason under the sun makes you a “good parent.”

That- is ridiculous!

NARAL abortion head: if election was today, we’d lose

Posted in NARAL with tags , , , , on October 1, 2014 by saynsumthn

On September 17, the largest abortion lobbying group sent out a letter that said that if the election were held today- the abortion industry would lose:

Election Sept 2014 Lose

The letter seeking money of course and written by the president of NARAL, Ilyse G. Hogue, reads, “I hate to say it, but based on the polls, if the election was held today, we’d lose…But here’s the other problem: Voters on our side are notorious for not showing up to vote in midterm elections, while anti-choice conservatives tend to vote no matter what.”

This is no time to quit- pro-lifers must show up at the polls and make this prediction true!