Archive for WorldView Weekend

Are The Elite Inviting a Terror Attack in America in order to have a crisis to exploit?

Posted in climate change, Climategate, Glenn Beck, Global Warming, Homeland Security, New World Order, Obama, Rahm Amanuel, terrorism with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on January 7, 2010 by saynsumthn

I am not certain this would be correct, however it does not look good so far

From: Worldview Weekend:

Brannon Howse: January 6, 2010
Are The Elite Inviting a Terror Attack in America in order to have a crisis to exploit? Brannon says the answer is yes based on several recent events.
1. Obama is diverting intelligence assets to climate research.
2. MI5 told us about Detroit bomber’s terror links a year ago and yet he was not on the no fly list.
3. State Department using “Diversity Visa” to encourage immigrants from terror-ridden Yemen to come to America.
4. DHS plans to only catch 1 out of every 4 travelers that commit “major” criminal violations while entering U.S. on international flights in 2010.
5. Obama is going to release suspected terrorists so they can return to Yemen.
6. Homeland Secretary is incompetent and only got the job as a political payback for supporting Obama when he was running for the White House. If our government was really interested in preventing terror attacks we would place the best and brightest in this position.
7. Rocket launcher found in apartment in Houston along with Jihadist writings and no charges were filed. We open of the phones for your thoughts on this subject.
Click here to: Download the MP3

___________________________________________________________________________________________

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters Wednesday afternoon that the unclassified version of a “comprehensive” preliminary White House review of the attempted bombing of a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas Day will be released Thursday.

According to Gibbs, President Obama will make remarks in conjunction with the release of the review. He expected the release and comments in the early afternoon.

Officials are engaged in separate reviews of passenger screening procedures and the use of terror watch lists. The review to be released tomorrow largely relates to the watch lists, and was prepared by counterterrorism and homeland security adviser John Brennan.

Both Brennan and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano will likely discuss their review at the White House tomorrow, Gibbs said. Napolitano’s review has focused largely on detection capabilities and screening.

Following a meeting with top officials Tuesday, the president said that the reviews continue to “reveal more about the human and systemic failures that almost cost nearly 300 lives.”

Officials have already updated government watch lists in the wake of the attack. The president says the system “is not broken” but lamented in comments Tuesday that 23-year-old Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the alleged bomber, was able to board the airplane despite numerous red flags being raised about him.

He said intelligence agencies knew enough to disrupt the terror attempt but failed to connect the dots to do so.

Gibbs said Wednesday that Mr. Obama will continue to examine and evaluate the security situation in the coming months.

As federal prosecutors formally charged suspected terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the preliminary report on the failed bombing of flight 253 is about to be made public. Bill Plante reports.

Joe Biden:
Mark my words. Mark my words. It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking.

Surge in former inmates accused of terrorism

WASHINGTON: As many as one in five former Guantanamo Bay detainees are suspected of or confirmed to have engaged in terrorist activity since being released, say US officials.

The 20 per cent rate is an increase on the 14 per cent of former inmates that a Pentagon report in April said were thought to have joined terrorist efforts, the officials said.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1/7/2010 Obama pulls CIA Agents off terrorism and puts them on ” GLOBAL RESEARCH PROJECTS” Seriously??????????
Deneen Borelli of the National Black Leadership Network discusses the CIAs use of resources as they begin sharing data with climate scientists.

_________________________________________________________________________________
Rham Emanuel

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

Glenn Beck Rips Into Saul Alinsky And Obama


Rush Limbaugh on Saul Alinsky

Copenhagen Kyoto Treaty : They are about to impose a Communist World Government on the World

Posted in Cap + Trade, Constitution, Environment, Glenn Beck, Holdren, Maafa21, New World Order, Population Control with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 22, 2009 by saynsumthn

Enslavement by a New Copenhagen Protocol to the Climate Change Treaty

By Henry Lamb/ WorldView Weekend

Copenhagen is about to become the successor to Kyoto as the synonym for the U.N.’s plan to control climate change. The 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change will meet in Copenhagen December 7-18. Until this meeting ends, expect to hear a growing number of climate-related horror stories, presented by a wide array of so-called environmentalists, at a rising decibel level that’s sure to drive the sane quite mad.

The UNFCCC was a voluntary treaty through which the United States agreed to voluntarily reduce carbon emissions in 1992. At the very first meeting of the COP in 1995, the delegates decided to add a “Protocol” to the treaty that would make specific emissions reduction targets set by the U.N. body legally binding on 34 developed nations. The U.S. Senate adopted a resolution instructing the Clinton administration to not participate in the Protocol unless it included all nations, or if it would have a negative impact on the U.S. economy.

At the third meeting of the COP in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan, the U.S. delegation followed the Senate’s instruction and refused to agree to the terms set for the United States by the U.N. body, because the developing nations refused to accept any reduction in their carbon emissions. The impasse lasted well into the second week of the meeting.

Then, Prince Albert Gore made his entrance. In a private meeting in his hotel suite, Gore negotiated a deal that completely ignored the Senate resolution, and agreed to accept a legally binding emissions reduction equal to 7% below 1990 levels by 2012, while agreeing to impose absolutely no requirements on developing nations. The Senate was steamed, and Clinton knew better than to transmit the Kyoto Protocol for ratification.

One of the two really good things that George W. Bush did was to withdraw from the Kyoto Protocol altogether. (The other good thing he did was to withdraw from the International Criminal Court).

The United Nations, Hollywood, environmental organizations, and most of the Democrats, squalled, bawled, cursed, and ridiculed “W” for his cavalier, go-it-alone, cowboy swagger. The Kyoto Protocol went into effect without the United States’ participation.

The Copenhagen meeting is supposed to produce the successor to the Kyoto Protocol, which will expire in 2012. This new agreement is supposed to set new emissions reductions targets, even more onerous than the Kyoto targets. The same arguments plague the negotiations leading up to the Copenhagen meeting that plagued negotiations in Kyoto: developing nations absolutely do not want any kind of reductions imposed upon them, while insisting that developed nations, especially the United States, be forced to drastically reduce carbon emissions.

Problem for Obama: he has as much as promised the world that the United States would rejoin the international climate change treaty – regardless of the cost. Apparently, he thought his promise, and his teleprompter would be sufficient to persuade developing nations to join the party. So far, they haven’t. His ace-in-the-hole is his “Cap & Trade” bill that he wants signed before the Copenhagen meeting. If he gets his bill, he can tell the developing nations that the U.S. has already done its part, and that he will not sign the Copenhagen agreement unless the developing nations do. Of course, if he doesn’t get the Cap & Trade bill before Copenhagen, he may have to develop a new strategy.

Notice the absence of any discussion about the validity of climate change science, or the need to control it? Climate change has nothing to do with the negotiations or the meetings, or the treaties. It never has. Climate change is simply an excuse to construct a monstrous international bureaucracy that meets many times each year in exotic venues around the world. Billions of dollars flow into and out of the climate change industry. No one involved in the climate change business wants to hear anything other than a new horror story to put the fear of catastrophe into appropriators.

Dissent is worse than a dirty word at these U.N. meetings. The actual meetings where negotiations occur are closed. Mercy be unto anyone caught with a tape recorder or video camera in an area other than a lobby of cafeteria, or when accompanied by a U.N. staff member. Literature may not be distributed unless first approved by the U.N. staff. In fact, ordinary people cannot even get into one of these meetings. Only official delegates of a government, approved representatives of accredited NGOs, or approved press professionals can register.

Watch the momentum mount as the December meeting draws closer. Ice caps will melt faster, oceans will rise higher, droughts will be more severe, snow falls will be deeper, ice storms will be slicker, crops will fail more often, men will become impotent, and African pygmies will be recruited by the Boston Celtics – all because of climate change – with the only cure being enslavement by a new Copenhagen Protocol to the Climate Change Treaty.

“”They are about to impose a Communist World Government on the World”


Former Thatcher Adviser Monckton Warns Global Warming Alarmism ‘Kills People If You Get the Science Wrong’

“I think the question you’re asking is who’s behind the scare,” Monckton said. “There’s been a long history of scares recently and scientific frauds of various kinds. It began, I suppose, with the eugenics movement in the 1930s which led to Hitler. It followed on with the Lysenko movement in Russia under Stalin. It went on with the great leap back under Chairman Mao which led again to tens of millions of deaths. The point you’re making is that this kills people if you get the science wrong.”


Sign the Instrument of Repudiation here

Population Police? As mentioned above – Check out Maafa21: