Archive for WHO

Bill Gates Enters Ebola Fight

Posted in Bill Gates, Ebola with tags , , , , , , , , , , on October 22, 2014 by saynsumthn

I recently blogged about how population control group, International Planned Parenthood Federation or IPPF is getting involved in the fight against Ebola.

Bill Gates Ebola Spet 2014

Now…another population control organization, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has stepped into the Ebola fight. The Gates are huge doors of eugenic abortion which leaves many suspicious of their supposed charitable efforts worldwide and especially in African nations.

According to news from the University of Washington, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is working to avert future emergencies and decrease the spread of the current outbreak. The foundation is working with various organizations to provide funding for Ebola interventions, increase support in the three affected countries, and increase emergency response systems in unaffected countries throughout West Africa.

“There are ways we can get ahead of future disasters by making these core investments,” said Amanda Lanzarone, part of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Emergency Response team. “We work on long term programming to improve capacity of local responders so they are not completely overwhelmed when response of this magnitude hit.”

In September, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced that it will commit $50 million to support the scale up of emergency efforts to contain the Ebola outbreak in West Africa and interrupt transmission of the virus.

The foundation stated that they would immediately release flexible funds to United Nations agencies and international organizations involved in the response to enable them and national governments to purchase badly needed supplies and scale up emergency operations in affected countries. In addition, the foundation will work with public and private sector partners to accelerate the development of therapies, vaccines, and diagnostics that could be effective in treating patients and preventing further transmission of the disease.

Gates Susan Desmond-Hellmann Ebola

According to their website, the Gates Foundation has committed more than $10 million of the $50 million to fight the Ebola outbreak, including $5 million to World Health Organization (WHO)for emergency operations and R&D assessments and $5 million to the U.S. Fund for UNICEF to support efforts in Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea to purchase essential medical supplies, coordinate response activities, and provide at-risk communities with life-saving health information. An additional $2 million will also be committed immediately to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to support incident management, treatment, and health care system strengthening.

Bill Gates Politico Ebola

The end of September 2014, Bill Gates told Politico that Ebola is a great example of where the world needs to come together. “I’m sure we will be able to get this under control,” he said.

After Ebola broke out in Dallas, Texas, Bill Gates spoke to Bloomberg about their efforts:

Perhaps this news is just indicative of a charitable and philanthropic agenda on behalf of Bill Gates and his Foundation.

Or…perhaps the organization, known for their population control and abortion agenda, has something more up their sleeve.

What that is- we may not know for years to come….but…stay tuned.

If you do not know about the Gates/ Abortion connection read: Gates says they don’t fund abortion so why do they fund abortion providers ?

World Health Org (WHO) library contains an abortion on video (Warning Graphic Images)

Posted in Abortion Training, Abortion Video, World Health Association with tags , , , on June 2, 2014 by saynsumthn

WHO Logo WHO stands for the World Health Organization. A recent glance on YouTube has uncovered a video provided by WHO giving step by step instructions for performing an abortion.

WHO is the directing and coordinating authority for health within the United Nations system. It is responsible for providing leadership on global health matters, shaping the health research agenda, setting norms and standards, articulating evidence-based policy options, providing technical support to countries and monitoring and assessing health trends.

The Reproductive Health Library is a division of the World Health Organization (WHO). This “library” contains an abortion vid.

RHL

________________________________________
In the RHL library you will find a teaching video titled: Termination of pregnancy with the manual vacuum aspirator. This video demonstrates the technique of termination of early pregnancy with the manual vacuum aspirator.

_____________________________________________-
The video is graphic and you must sign in to watch it. It begins with a demonstration and explanation of each instrument that will be uses in the abortion procedure.

Med InstrumentsSpeculemDisinfect Instruments
____________________________________________________

Then the video moves on to go through each step of the abortion including an ultrasound of the “fetus”:

Capture2Capture3
Ultrasound Fetus found
_____________________________________

As this early abortion comes to an end, what WHO fails to do in the film, is to show what was removed by the aspirator.

What is disturbing is that this UN organization refers to the unborn child as “contents” and “products.” I guess you have to dehumanize a child to be able to kill one.

Speculum into vaginaAspirator InsertedBarrel Emptied
____________________________________

You can watch the video your self here:


According to the GAO, The United States is a key participant in WHO’s governing bodies and the largest donor to WHO, contributing about $219 million, or 22 percent, to WHO’s regular, assessed budget for 2010 and 2011,
as well as more than $475 million, or about 16 percent, to WHO’s voluntary budge.

Who Video

Gonorrhea growing resistant to drugs, WHO warns

Posted in STD with tags , , , , on June 7, 2012 by saynsumthn

Gonorrhea growing resistant to drugs, WHO warns
Posted: Jun 06, 2012 2:14 AM CDTUpdated: Jun 06, 2012 11:05 AM CDT
By FRANK JORDANS
Associated Press

GENEVA (AP) – A sexually transmitted disease that infects millions of people each year is growing resistant to drugs and could soon become untreatable, the World Health Organization said Wednesday.

The U.N. health agency is urging governments and doctors to step up surveillance of antibiotic-resistant gonorrhea, a bacterial infection that can cause inflammation, infertility, pregnancy complications and, in extreme cases, lead to maternal death. Babies born to mothers with gonorrhea have a 50 percent chance of developing eye infections that can result in blindness.

“This organism has basically been developing resistance against every medication we’ve thrown at it,” said Dr. Manjula Lusti-Narasimhan, a scientist in the agency’s department of sexually transmitted diseases. This includes a group of antibiotics called cephalosporins currently considered the last line of treatment.

“In a couple of years it will have become resistant to every treatment option we have available now,” she told The Associated Press in an interview ahead of WHO’s public announcement on its ‘global action plan’ to combat the disease.

Lusti-Narasimhan said the new guidance is aimed at ending complacency about gonorrhea and encouraging researchers to speed up their hunt for a new cure.

Once considered a scourge of sailors and soldiers, gonorrhea – known colloquially as the clap – became easily treatable with the discovery of penicillin. Now, it is the second most common sexually transmitted infection after chlamydia. The global health body estimates that gonorrhea is responsible for some 106 million infections annually. It also increases the chances of infection with other diseases, such as HIV.

“It’s not a European problem or an African problem, it’s really a worldwide problem,” said Lusti-Narasimhan.

Scientists believe overuse or incorrect use of antibiotics, coupled with the gonorrhea bacteria’s astonishing ability to adapt, means the disease is now close to becoming a super bug.

Bacteria that survive antibiotic treatment due to a mutation that makes them resistant then quickly spread their genes in an accelerated process of natural selection. This is a general problem affecting all antibiotics, but gonorrhea is particularly quick to adapt because it is good at picking up snippets of DNA from other bacteria, said Lusti-Narasimhan.

“If it didn’t do so much damage it would actually be a fun organism to study,” she said.

Resistance to cephalosporins was first reported in Japan, but more recently has also been detected in Britain, Australia, France, Sweden and Norway. As these are all countries with well-developed health systems, it is likely that cephalosporin-resistant strains are also circulating undetected elsewhere.

“I think this is probably only the tip of the iceberg,” said Prof. Catherine Ison, who oversees the national surveillance program for treatment of resistant gonorrhea in England and Wales.

The over-the-counter availability of low potency antibiotics in some Asian countries is one of the reasons why resistance is increasing, she said.

Doctors in Britain are now switching to using a combination of antibiotics over a longer period of time to combat resistant gonorrhea, said Ison, who is based at the UK’s Health Protection Agency.

The Geneva-based WHO wants countries not just to tighten their rules for antibiotic use but also to improve their surveillance systems so that the full extent of the problem can be determined.

Better sex education is also needed, as proper condom use is an effective means of stopping transmission, said Lusti-Narasimhan.

“We’re not going to be able to get rid of it completely,” she said. “But we can limit the spread.”

H1N1 WHO exaggerated threat? Influenced by drug makers ?

Posted in Flu Chip, Flu Shot, H1N1, Vaccinations with tags , , , , , , , , on June 7, 2010 by saynsumthn

Reports accuse WHO of exaggerating H1N1 threat, possible ties to drug makers
By Rob Stein
Washington Post Staff Writer

Friday, June 4, 2010; 3:52 PM

European criticism of the World Health Organization‘s handling of the H1N1 pandemic intensified Friday with the release of two reports that accused the agency of exaggerating the threat posed by the virus and failing to disclose possible influence by the pharmaceutical industry on its recommendations for how countries should respond.

The WHO’s response caused widespread, unnecessary fear and prompted countries around the world to waste millions of dollars, according to one report. At the same time, the Geneva-based arm of the United Nations relied on advice from experts with ties to drug makers in developing the guidelines it used to encourage countries to stockpile millions of doses of antiviral medications, according to the second report.

The reports outlined the drumbeat of criticism that has arisen, primarily in Europe, of how the world’s leading health organization responded to the first influenza pandemic in more than four decades.

“For WHO, its credibility has been badly damaged,” wrote Fiona Godlee, the editor of the BMJ, a prominent British medical journal, that published one of the reports. “WHO must act now to restore its credibility.”

A spokesman for the WHO, along with several independent experts, however, strongly disputed the reports, saying they misrepresented the seriousness of the pandemic and the WHO’s response, which was carefully formulated and necessary given the potential threat.

“The idea that we declared a pandemic when there wasn’t a pandemic is both historically inaccurate and downright irresponsible,” said WHO spokesman Gregory Hartl in a telephone interview. “There is no doubt that this was a pandemic. To insinuate that this was not a pandemic is very disrespectful to the people who died from it.”

The first report, released in Paris, came from the Social, Health and Family Affairs Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, which launched an investigation in response to allegations that the WHO’s response to the pandemic was influenced by drug companies that make antiviral drugs and vaccines.

“The parliamentary assembly is alarmed about the way in which the H1N1 influenza pandemic has been handled, not only by the World Health Organization (WHO), but also by the competent health authorities at the level of the European Union and at national level,” the 18-page draft report states.

“It is particularly troubled by some of the consequences of decisions taken and advice given leading to distortion of priorities of public health services across Europe, waste of large sums of public money, and also unjustified scares and fears about health risks faced by the European public at large,” according to the report.

The second report, a joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, which is based in London, criticized 2004 guidelines the WHO developed based in part on the advice of three experts who received consulting fees from the two leading manufacturers of antiviral drugs used against the virus, Roche and GlaxoSmithKline.

“We are left wondering whether major public health organizations are able to effectively manage the conflicts of interest that are inherent in medical science,” the report states.

Hartl dismissed those charges.

“WHO would say categorically that it believes that it has not been subject to undue conflict-of-interest. We know that some experts that come to our committees have contact with industry. It would be surprising if they didn’t because the best experts are sought by all organizations,” Hartl said. “We feel that the guidelines produced were certainly not subject to undue influence.”

Several other experts also defended the agency.

“Twenty-twenty hindsight can always second guess the decisions of public health officials,” said Jeffrey Levi, executive director of the Trust for America’s Health, a private nonprofit group. “But this kind of condemnation of public health officials who made the most prudent decisions based on available knowledge could well backfire in future emergencies: I fear that public health officials will draw the lesson that they should wait for greater scientific certainty before responding in the future — and we could pay for that overcaution with many lives lost.”

In response to the criticism, the WHO has launched two investigations, including one by an independent panel of experts led by Harvey Fineberg, who heads the Institute of Medicine at the U.S. National Academy of Sciences.

These reports raise questions about potential, inappropriate influences on WHO decision-making in the assessment and response to the 2009 H1N1 pandemic and, more generally, question practices employed by WHO to guard against conflict of interest among its expert advisers,” Fineberg said in an e-mail. “These topics are among those that will be fully considered by our review committee.”

World Health Organization moves forward with Eugenic abortion goals

Posted in Abortion, United Nations, World Health Association with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on April 16, 2010 by saynsumthn

WHO chief sides with U.S. over abortion access and maternal health

By Steven Edwards, Canwest News Service April 15, 2010

World Health Organization (WHO) Director General Margaret Chan delivers her speech at the opening of a health experts meeting at the WHO headquarters on April 12, 2010 in Geneva.

UNITED NATIONS — The head of the World Health Organization signaled Wednesday that the United States — not Canada — was on the right track over the question of supporting access to abortion services amid an international bid to improve child and maternal health.

Dr. Margaret Chan tipped her hand just minutes after sitting next to International Co-operation Minister Bev Oda at a news conference at the United Nations, where the two women and other dignitaries joined UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon in announcing the launch of the world body’s new push to reduce maternal childbirth and pregnancy deaths.

Chan described abortion as a “very complex, difficult and sensitive” issue, but went on to praise U.S. President Barack Obama for his position that women have a legal right to the procedure.

Her comment contrasted the position of the Harper government, whose “signature” international initiative on maternal and children’s health initially aimed to exclude access to abortion.

“In the case of Canada, I think I respect the government and its people to decide what is their right investment — and I am sure that this is the discussion that is going on,” said Chan, director-general of WHO.

But she added: “I am very pleased to see the change in President Obama — this is really wonderful; sometimes . . . it is not easy for outside people to tell them what to do.”

Last year the Obama administration began to re-fund the UN Population Fund, which the previous Bush administration kept at arm’s length amid accusations the UN agency had ties to China’s one-child policy, which critics say involves forced abortions.

And last month, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in Ottawa that any international effort to boost maternal health must include family planning services — among them access to legal, safe abortions.
David Miliband, the British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, who was also in the Canadian capital, joined her in that stance.

Oda will run into Chan again Thursday, when the two are scheduled to be among a select group of 40 government, agency and foundation representatives meeting behind closed doors to launch work on a “joint action plan” on maternity and child care that UN member states will be asked to adopt at the UN’s September Summit.

UN officials say the plan seeks to find a way to meet universally agreed goals on such care among the development goals set at the 2000 Millennium Summit.

The push for the joint-action plan unfolds as Canada will this summer use its position as host of the G8 meeting to promote its maternal and children’s health care initiative. Canada is also set to host this summer the G20, which represents the leading developed and developing nations.

“Development work is a constant process, and so you don’t just set a target for one meeting,” Oda told reporters after saying in a statement that the parallel efforts by the bordering countries would be “complementary.”

She added that Canada would not insist that other G8 members agree with the Canadian government’s approach on the abortion issue, reflecting Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s comments in the House of Commons recently that countries were free to make their own decisions about how to best further the overall health care cause.

“I’ve just told my colleagues that every country has experience, and we’re asking them all to focus within a framework,” Oda said. “However, they will be free and flexible to choose the best way that they will contribute to the effort.”

The UN launched its initiative amid its own embarrassment after the British medical journal Lancet reported on a study that said maternity deaths were sharply down — in contrast to a UN report Tuesday that said there had been little change.

Amid suggestions by some international commentators that the UN had deliberately camouflaged progress in order to try to maintain the flow of international aid, Ban said he “welcomed” the Lancet report, which quoted from a study funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

“There should not be any misunderstandings,” Ban said.

Chan, meanwhile, called the findings of both studies “estimates.”

The paper published by the Lancet said the number of women dying each year from childbirth had fallen to about 342,900 in 2008, down from 526,300 in 1980.

The UN — which says rich countries need to hand over about $20 billion a year between now an 2015 in order to meet the Millennium goals — claimed the figure remains steady at about 500,000 deaths a year.

The UN faced a similar controversy over its past claims about the number of people afflicted with the AIDS virus. Officials finally admitted they had been overestimating the numbers and donors began to downsize their financial commitments.

Learn How abortion is used as a tool of Black Genocide – Watch 2.5 hour film: Maafa21

Skepticism on Swine Flu’s Danger Limits European Vaccine Demand

Posted in Flu Shot, H1N1, Swine Flu, Vaccinations with tags , , , , , , , on December 9, 2009 by saynsumthn

From Bloomberg

By Andrea Gerlin

Dec. 8 (Bloomberg) — Fewer Europeans are getting pandemic flu vaccine than typically get seasonal flu shots, as safety concerns and lower-than-expected death rates have damped demand.

The U.K., Ireland, Italy, Germany and France have vaccinated less than 10 percent of their populations, compared with 20 percent in Europe in a typical flu season. As a result, a fraction of the European Union’s 500 million people will be protected against the pandemic virus by early next year.

Public concerns that the vaccines made by GlaxoSmithKline Plc, Novartis AG and Baxter International Inc. may cause serious side effects have kept some Europeans on the sidelines since governments began vaccinating residents for free in October. That means Europe may donate more doses to poorer countries or experience a surge in hospital admissions if the virus mutates.

“If it’s not in the news anymore and if people don’t experience a lot of severe cases, to them it’s just a flu and not a pandemic flu in a way,” said Christian Ruef, professor of infectious disease and director of infection control at University Hospital Zurich. “The term pandemic to them is probably associated with more serious disease.”

The number of deaths is lower than what was predicted in worst-case scenarios after the virus first struck, Ruef said. Perceptions that the virus is mild may be hampering vaccination, he said.

The European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases said on Nov. 23 that it was concerned about “mixed levels of uptake” and opposition from anti-vaccine activists challenging the safety of and need for the shot. The vaccines made by London-based Glaxo, Basel, Switzerland-based Novartis and Deerfield, Illinois-based Baxter were approved for use by the European Medicines Agency.

Unpredictable Virus

“No one should reject a safe and effective vaccine when we are dealing with an unpredictable virus capable of killing children and young adults in their prime,” said Javier Garau, president of the Basel-based European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

More than 8,768 people worldwide have died from swine flu since it was first identified in Mexico and the U.S. in April, the Geneva-based World Health Organization said on Dec. 4. More than 850 deaths have been reported in Europe since April, according to the Stockholm-based European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. As many as 500,000 people globally die of seasonal flu each year, according to the WHO.

Officials expect the virus to be prevalent again in 2010. The WHO in September decided to include swine flu in the vaccine for seasonal influenza in the next Southern Hemisphere flu season, meaning the agency believes it’s the most likely H1N1 strain to be circulating.

Polish Negotiations

Poland hasn’t used any vaccine so far, the country’s health ministry said.

We’ve been negotiating with producers for at least a month now because we want them to guarantee the vaccine’s safe and take responsibility for any unwanted side effects, and that’s something they don’t want to do,” said Piotr Olechno, a Polish Health Ministry spokesman. The government is in talks with five companies, Olechno said. He declined to name them.

The U.K. has shipped 10 million doses of swine flu vaccine to family doctors, who have inoculated about 1.6 million of the 9.3 million people in risk groups, England’s Chief Medical Officer Liam Donaldson said Dec. 3. That’s less than 2 percent of the country’s entire population of about 60 million.

Washing Hands

To reduce the risk of catching swine flu, Emma Murphy is washing her and her toddler’s hands more often, avoiding people with colds and stocking up on honey and lemon. She and her 17- month-old son won’t get immunized.

They put the vaccine out so quickly that I wouldn’t feel secure in giving it to him,” said Murphy, 29, a human resources assistant and student in Manchester, England, in an interview. “We’re being scared into making the decision by people saying children are dying.”

Italy had immunized 494,915 people out of about 60 million who live there as of Nov. 22, according to a Dec. 2 Health Ministry press release. France, where two patients died from a mutated version of the H1N1 virus that causes swine flu, has given pandemic shots to about 1.3 million people since Oct. 20, Health Minister Roselyne Bachelot-Narquin said on Dec. 3. The French government has ordered 94 million doses of vaccine for the country’s 63 million people.

Hard Decision

Parisian Simone Cartier said she “agonized” over whether to have her daughters, ages 2 and 5, immunized against swine flu. She doesn’t know anyone who has had the illness. After reading about the vaccine, she became concerned that it was produced too quickly and contains an adjuvant, an ingredient that boosts the immune system’s response. She then spoke to her doctor and changed her mind. Two weeks ago, she waited three hours in a school gym to get Glaxo’s Pandemrix shot for herself and her daughters.

“The night before going I thought: Am I going to inject my children with this poison or in 20 years am I going to be in front of a judge with kids who are sick?” said Cartier, 35, who works in book production. “Five minutes before leaving, I wanted to turn around. I try not to think about it.”

In Ireland, more than 150,000 people in risk groups — pregnant women and people with underlying illnesses — had been vaccinated as of Nov. 25, Gerry Mulligan of the Health Service Executive said. The country has had lower-than-expected uptake among children under 5 since it began vaccinating them in mid- November, Mulligan said. Ireland started vaccinating schoolchildren on Nov. 30, he said.

In the German federal state of Thuringia, 150,000 of 2.3 million residents have been immunized since Nov. 9, according to Thuringia’s health department.

Bright Spot

Declining swine flu rates in some countries also may deter people from getting the vaccine. England reported the fourth consecutive weekly drop in new swine flu cases on Dec. 3. Visits to U.S. doctors for influenza-like illness fell to the lowest level in three months, the government said on Dec. 4.

One bright spot in Europe’s pandemic immunization effort is Scandinavia. A third of Sweden’s 9.2 million people are estimated to have gotten the swine flu shot as of Nov. 20, according to the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. About 3.3 million doses of vaccine had been delivered to Sweden as of Nov. 20 and demand has outpaced supply.

“Everybody in my family got the shot,” said Jenny Mattisson, 36, a mother of three who lives in a suburb of Stockholm and usually doesn’t get a seasonal flu shot. “Our daughter is in a risk group so we wanted to try to minimize the chance of her getting sick, but I would have taken it anyway. I think it’s a good idea to get the vaccine; it helps slow it from spreading.”

Norway, U.S. Demand

Norway, where mutations in the H1N1 virus have been detected among two patients who died of the flu and one who was severely ill, had vaccinated all 1.2 million people in its risk groups as of Nov. 24, almost 25 percent of its total population, said Bjoerne-Inge Larsen, director general of Norway’s Directorate of Health. Finland has immunized about 1 million people, or 19 percent of its population, the government said on Nov. 26.

In the U.S., demand for the vaccine has been strong, with quick uptake of doses as they become available and waiting times at many providers, said Joseph Quimby, a spokesman for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in an interview on Dec. 4. Doctors had administered about 20 million shots by mid- November. Health officials plan to release updated estimates of inoculations in the next few weeks, Quimby said.

There were 73 million vaccine doses available for distribution by the end of last week and an additional 10 million doses arriving this week, CDC director Thomas Frieden said in a press conference Dec. 4. Some states are beginning to offer the shots to a wider audience, after initial supplies were focused on protecting pregnant women, children and adults with chronic health conditions.

Did Glenn Beck discover the “Mark of the Beast”? Veri-Chip and Swine Flu Vaccination Scares !

Posted in Common Sense, Constitution, Czar, Eugenics, Evolution, Flu Chip, Glenn Beck, H1N1, Health Care, Hitler, Martial Law, New World Order, Obama, Population Control, Pro-Life, Religion, Sterilization, Swine Flu, Vaccinations, Veri-Chip with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 8, 2009 by saynsumthn

10-8-2009

Veri-Chip is a real company and they spoke with Beck.

beck-glenn8

TURN UP THE VOLUME FOR THIS VIDEO:

Glenn Beck said he will discuss Veri-Chip and Swine Flu on tonight’s show. Putting chips in people with the H1N1 Flu shot- he said is NOT true, but that Veri Chip has a Gov’t contract because they have a “Swab Test” to determine if you have H1N1. Veri Chip also has a chip which they told Beck has “no tracking device” but contains a 16 digit number which can be scanned and then it shows that you’ve had the flu, been vaccinated, etc and it can be injected into you !

Beck stressed that this is NOT Happening NOW and his investigation shows there is no proof that any chips are being injected at this point – but he stresses that the technology DOES exist and that in an event of a national emergency – could it happen?

You will have to watch the show this evening to get the information for yourself – he just did a teaser on the radio !

UPDATE PM – Show now available:

vcfront1

Will the Health Care Bill mandate all of us being chipped? From Veri-Chips website:

VeriMed Health Link
Health Link is the connection between you and your personal health record. Health Link utilizes a tiny, passive microchip (the first and only microchip cleared for patient identification by the FDA) and a secure online database that links you to your personal health record.

Listen to this:



FROM: Canadian Free Press:

The Far Left has always been fond of social engineering, population control
H1N1, Global Conspiracies, and Amerikan Gulags

“Out of these troubled times…a new world order—can emerge….”—George H. W. Bush 9/11/90

“In questions of power then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”—Thomas Jefferson
The Far Left has always been fond of social engineering, and one of their pet projects has historically been population control.

We see it in President Woodrow Wilson’s advisor Royal Meeker, who divided society into those who were “effective,” and those who were “ineffective”—effective and ineffective units of the collective. Ineffective, or redundant units are to be disposed of—for the good of the hive.

We see it in Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood’s agenda of racial genocide (which is not about parenthood, but is definitely planned). I suggest you view a short movie trailer at MAAFA 21 and/or check out the website BlackGenocide.com

We see it in Obama’s “science czar” Holdren, about whom Joseph Abrams notes, “John Holdren, once floated the idea of forced abortions, “compulsory sterilization,” and the creation of a ‘Planetary Regime’ that would oversee human population levels….”

Perhaps the most important instrument used in the effort to enforce population control are pharmaceuticals—better living, and dying, through chemistry. Unfortunately, the right-wing seems as enamored as the left, when it comes to using big PhRMA to make Big Money.

During the “avian flu” (H5N1) scare, the only vaccine available was Tamiflu, made by Gilead, and Gilead was Donald Rumsfeld’s baby.

According to an article on CNNMoney.com, dated 10/31/05, ex-President Bush’s Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, “served as Gilead (Research)‘s chairman from 1997 until he joined the Bush administration in 2001, and he still holds a Gilead stake valued at between $5 million and $25 million….”

(Between $5 million and $25 million—say, that’s what Nancy Pelosi’s vineyard is appraised at. Pelosi’s accountant must be the same one that Rumsfeld uses).
It’s worth your time to check into the connections between Rumsfeld, Gilead Sciences, former Secretary of State George Schultz, Bechtel, Vistide, and Tamiflu.
It is reprehensible and unconscionable, how the pharmaceutical companies, in collusion with Democratic and Republican politicians, have used America’s armed forces as guinea-pigs for new vaccines.

According to an article by David Kirby, up to one in every fifty people in the military (and their dependants) have had ““serious adverse vaccine reactions, including disability and death.”

When discussing population control and vaccines, it’s worth recalling that last spring a group of billionaires met in New York City to discuss—overpopulation. They were dubbed the “Good Club.” Attendees included David Rockefeller, and your buddy and mine, George Soros.

As soon as you can, you should go to HealthFreedomUSA.org, and read what it says about Congressman Ron Paul’s “No Compulsory Vaccine Bill.” It’s vitally important.

I thank Ron Paul for his foresight, and ask that he get his Vaccine Bill on the House floor ASAP—the sooner the better. Emergency action is called for.
It should be noted that Ron Paul was one of only two members in the House to vote against the government’s swine flu vaccination in 1976—the other Congressman who voted against it, McDonald, was also a physician.

Paul and McDonald were correct. The only one who died from the swine flu was the original patient, a soldier at Ft. Dix, NJ. The—only—one.
The swine flu vaccination, however, was responsible for over two dozen deaths, and many illnesses, including Guillain-Barre syndrome, a nerve disorder.
The whole “swine flu,” H1N1 hysteria has been somewhat quiescent of late, but that ended early Sunday with an article in Britain’s “The Observer,” by Rajeev Syal. Syal’s article is about a U.N. dossier released this past Thursday.

The dossier, which originated with WHO (the U.N.‘s World Health Organization), says that because of the swine flu, millions of people will die, and anarchy will run rampant across the globe.

The report says that this scenario can only be avoided, if the richer countries pay for the vaccinations of the poorer populations.
All stop.

Says who? Who says that millions will die? Who are the people that are making these “predictions?”

Early last spring, WHO started ramping up the same type of hysterical hyperbole. A timely YouTube video by Dr. Len Horowitz quashed the momentum of the manufactured “crisis.”

However, it didn’t take long for WHO to start cranking up the pressure again.

Last June, in Forbes.com, Vivian Wai-yin Kwok reported that “An emergency WHO meeting will be held on Thursday to discuss whether to raise the alert level for the new strain of H1N1 influenza to phase 6, the highest level on its pandemic alert scale.

The Forbes article continued, “WHO called for an urgent meeting…after its chief, Dr. Margaret Chan, quizzed eight countries with large swine flu outbreaks in a teleconference on Wednesday. Chan has indicated she believes that a pandemic is under way….”

WHO did indeed announce a Level Six pandemic this past June. This in spite of the fact that “the Swine Flu has infected less people world-wide, than the ordinary annual flu kills in the United States alone.”

That last quote is worth reading again.

Why would WHO announce its highest state of emergency, for a flu that has shown no significant causes for worry up to this point?

Obama’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology says that it “considers the H1N1 pandemic ‘a serious health threat; to the U.S. — not as serious as the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic but worse than the swine flu outbreak of 1976.”

“Worse than the swine flu outbreak of 1976?” What outbreak? One person died as a result of having the swine flu in 1976. One death—worldwide. It was the U.S. government’s vaccinations that killed people.

In order for the current flu pandemic to be “worse” than the 1976 “swine flu outbreak,” two people would have to die—one more than in 1976. Hardly a cause for global panic.

What’s going on here?
I’m reminded of a speech that President Kennedy gave before he was murdered. The following three paragraphs are excerpts from that speech.

The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.”

We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence—on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.”

It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.”

Was Kennedy referring to Global Communism, the Rothschild/Rockefellers, the Illuminati, the NWO (New World Order), OWG (One World Government)—or something else?

(In passing—lest we forget—last winter, Jay Rockefeller (D-W VA) introduced a bill that would give Obama control over the internet—so that Obama can shut down the internet just like Ahmadinejad recently did, when squashing the uprising by the Iranian people).

Worrying about the “who” at this point in the game, is really of secondary interest (pun noted). I’ve never been into “conspiracy theories,” but the more I researched the whole “swine flu” issue, the more convinced I became that America, and indeed the world, is being set up like a bowling pin.

Major pharmaceutical companies are part of an insidious plan. Two of the key players are the pharmaceutical giants Novavax (“Creating Tomorrow’s Vaccines Today”), and Baxter.

Watch Dr. Horowitz’s video, if you haven’t done so yet, in order to find out a bit about Novavax. By the way, Dr. Horowitz knows first hand about the serious problems connected with swine flu vaccines—his mother was one of those who died from a swine flu inoculation in 1976.

Note—it was not the swine flu, but the vaccine, that killed Dr. Horowitz’s mother.

Within the past few days, Dr. Horowitz and journalist Sherri Kane, released legal affidavits stating that a private global biotechnology “trust” are behind the pandemic flu hysteria—including its origin. David Rockefeller is named as one of the co-conspirators.

Don’t miss that phrase—“including its origin.”

(A brief aside: Dr. Horowitz, among others, suggests taking vitamin D supplements during the “flu season.” As fall turns into winter, the days get shorter, and we receive less sunlight—which means that our bodies produce less vitamin D. It’s the decrease in vitamin D which makes us more prone to get colds and flu’s—not the cold weather. Keep in mind that you can overdose on vitamin D, so be judicious with your dosage).

On another front—in June, journalist Barbara Minton reported that “As the anticipated July release date for Baxter’s A/H1N1 flu pandemic vaccine approaches, an Austrian investigative journalist is warning the world that the greatest crime in the history of humanity is underway.”

Baxter Healthcare is a mammoth pharmaceutical business headquartered in Illinois, near Chicago.

Minton continues, “Jane Burgermeister [journalist] has recently filed criminal charges with the FBI against the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations (UN), and several of the highest ranking government and corporate officials concerning bioterrorism and attempts to commit mass murder.”

Burgermeister believes that “There is no pandemic potential unless mass vaccinations are carried out to weaponize the flu under the guise of protecting the population.”
Last winter reports surfaced of the first case of “swine flu” near Reforma, Mexico. The flu was reportedly “a nasty mash-up of swine, avian, and human viruses” Reforma is conveniently located near a huge pig farm.

For this “nasty mishmash” to have occurred naturally, would be impossible. It didn’t occur naturally, because of conditions at some pig farm.

“H1N1” was manufactured in a lab. Technically, H1N1 is only one part of what is currently being called the “H1N1” flu.

Natural News put it this way, “For this to have been a natural [occurrence] it means an infected bird from North America would have had to infect pigs in Europe, then be re-infected by those same pigs, with an unlikely cross-species mutation that allowed the bird to carry it again, then that bird would have had to fly to Asia and infected pigs there, and those Asian pigs would then have had to mutate the virus once again (while preserving the European swine and bird elements) to become humanly transmittable, and then a human would have had to catch that virus from the Asian pigs — in Mexico!”

Sound likely to you? It not only doesn’t sound likely, it sounds impossible—because it is impossible.

So if the pig farm isn’t the source of the swine flu outbreak, what, and who, is?

Well, it’s certainly interesting that the pig farm in Reforma is located about twenty miles away from a Baxter facility in Villahermosa, Mexico. What a coincidence, huh?

Obama, at any rate, doesn’t seem fazed in the least by the flu pandemic. Last spring he traveled to the “eye of the storm” itself, Mexico.
Seems more than a little reckless to me, what with the “killer flu” lurking around and all. Maybe he knows something we don’t.

In 2005, President Bush gave a speech in which he announced a new plan—called the Pandemic Influenza Strategic Plan.

Bush began his speech by saying, “At this moment, there is no pandemic influenza in the United States, or the world. But if history is our guide, there is reason to be concerned.”

Indeed.
Let me discuss one more thing, and then I’ll close.

Included in national pandemic plans are quarantine camps, and RFID bracelets (Radio Frequency Identity Devices).

Several states have written quarantine laws this year.


This is from Florida’s law:

“You shall cooperate with the detention facility’s access to you… “
“If you do not answer your telephone or are not at home during two consecutive contact attempts, the CHD may order you to wear an electronic monitoring bracelet to ensure that you do not leave your residence. If you leave your residence while monitored, the CHD may forcibly detain you in a quarantine facility.”


This is from Massachusetts’ law:

“An officer authorized to serve criminal process may arrest without a warrant any person whom the officer has probable cause to believe has violated an order given to effectuate the purposes of this subsection and shall use reasonable diligence to enforce such order.” [Gunpoint]

This is from Pennsylvania’s law:

“To require that any corpse, prior to disposal, be clearly labeled with all available information to identify the decedent and the circumstances of death.”
Sounds ominous doesn’t it?

Perhaps each of the things that I’ve pointed to in this article is, by itself, not too worrisome. But if we step back, and look at the “big picture,” it’s very troubling indeed.

At the very least, nefarious manipulations are going on, and at the worst….

Some very forceful legal action is in order. Immediately.

Playtime is over ladies and gentlemen, this insanity must be stopped now.

As always, prayer is in order—laus Deo.

In an effort to show all sides – here is a report you may want to also consider

UPDATE FRIDAY – READ:

Lawsuit filed against FDA to halt swine flu vaccines; claims FDA violated federal law

Another interesting read ( UPDATED 10-13-2009) N1H1 Vaccine and Thalidomide Deformed Babies-CNN and Time Magazine

READ: New Flu Chip can determine the genetic make-up of types of flu virus in 11 hours

UPDATED – Also Read:

Don’t Blame Flu Shots for All Ills, Officials Say
By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.

As soon as swine flu vaccinations start next month, some people getting them will drop dead of heart attacks or strokes, some children will have seizures and some pregnant women will miscarry.

But those events will not necessarily have anything to do with the vaccine. That poses a public relations challenge for federal officials, who remember how sensational reports of deaths and illnesses derailed the large-scale flu vaccine drive of 1976.

This time they are making plans to respond rapidly to such events and to try to reassure a nervous public — and headline-hunting journalists — that the vaccine is not responsible.

Every year, there are 1.1 million heart attacks in the United States, 795,000 strokes and 876,000 miscarriages, and 200,000 Americans have their first seizure. Inevitably, officials say, some of these will happen within hours or days of a flu shot. Rest here

READ: Flu Shot Disables Washington Redskins cheerleader Desiree Jennings

*** The views expressed in the videos and article above are not necessarily the views of this blogger.