Archive for Suzanna M. de Baca

About the Bottom Line? Planned Parenthood Chief’s Background not HealthCare but Finances!

Posted in Planned Parenthood, Planned Parenthood 990, Planned Parenthood CEO, Planned Parenthood Employee, Planned Parenthood rich off taxpayers, Planned Parenthood six digit salary with tags , , , , , , , on October 3, 2014 by saynsumthn

Suzanna DeBaca des.m1002debaca4992

50 year old Suzanna M. de Baca , whose background is mainly in finance, has accepted the position of president and chief executive officer of Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, effective Sept. 2, 2014.

She is replacing Jill June who, according to the latest 990 from Planned Parenthood for 2012 eared $283,910 plus $12,282 in compensation

PP Heartland 2012 990

According to the Des Moines Register, de Baca’s resume includes a master’s degree from the Harvard School of Business.

Her most recent job was as a vice president of Ameriprise Financial in Minneapolis. She said her experience as an investment adviser is relevant to her new role.

This is not a surprise, since the largest chain of abortion clinics gets half a BILLION (billion with a B) dollars in revenue from the American tax payer while they pay a majority of CEO’s of their hundreds of centers in six-digit salaries.

Iowa Right to Life has pointed out that what Planned Parenthood is all about is the bottom line not women, “For all their bluster about ‘Care, no matter what,’ this selection re-affirms what the abortion giant, Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, truly cares about — money.”

Robert Shaw, a retired physician who is Planned Parenthood of the Heartland’s board chairman, told the Register that the the abortion giant needed a leader with sophisticated understanding of business.

Shaw said de Baca’s financial background was a key attribute.

PP Heartland Header

This was reinforced by de Baca herself who said this in Planned Parenthood’s press release announcing the position, “I hope to bring my corporate experience to this organization as it evolves to meet the ongoing needs of women and families in a changing health care landscape.”

Apparently – the priority here seems to be the Bottom Line $