Archive for Socialism

KGB’s communist tactic “Ideological Subversion” and De-moralization” live and learn America !

Posted in KGB with tags , , , , , , , , , , on January 3, 2011 by saynsumthn

Vodpod videos no longer available.

KGB’s communist tactic “Ideological Subversion”…, posted with vodpod

Full Interview here:
Socialism explained by former KGB agent- vintage interview warns America

More here.

School Requires Permission Slips for Pledge to Flag

Posted in Censorship, Civil Rights, Outrage with tags , , , , , , on December 22, 2010 by saynsumthn

Vodpod videos no longer available.

School Requires Permission Slips for Pledge to …, posted with vodpod

Read more and see letter here

Eugenics is in the news today !

Posted in Abortion, Black Genocide, egg donations, Eugenics with tags , , , , , , , , , on December 21, 2010 by saynsumthn

Today I came across 2 articles on Eugenics – I found them both of interest and I will share a portion with you:

The first published in The New Statesman:
The eugenics movement Britain wants to forget,
By: Victoria Brignell
Published 09 December 2010

here is an exert:

This story begins 150 years ago. In 1859 Charles Darwin published his groundbreaking book Origin of Species which expounded his theory of evolution by natural selection. It wasn’t long before scientists and political theorists began to apply Darwin’s theory to human beings. With the spread of ideas about “the survival of the fittest”, social Darwinists started to question the wisdom of providing care to the “weak” on the grounds this would enable people to live and reproduce who were not meant to survive. They feared that offering medical treatment and social services to disabled people would undermine the natural struggle for existence and lead to the degeneration of the human race.

Such views took hold not only in Germany but also particularly strongly in America and Britain. The existence of disabled people was increasingly seen in the UK and USA as a threat to social progress. Darwin himself wrote in his 1871 treatise, The Descent of Man, “We civilised men…. do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed and the sick.. .Thus the weak members of society propagate their kind.”

It was a British man, not a German, who first came up with the term eugenics in 1883. Francis Galton was a cousin of Charles Darwin and he became obsessed with Origin of Species, especially its chapter on the breeding of domestic animals. This inspired him to spend much of his life studying the variations in human ability. He wrote: “The question was then forced upon me. Could not the race of men be similarly improved? Could not the undesirables be got rid of and the desirables multiplied?”.

Galton was convinced a person’s mental and physical abilities, like the plant and animal traits described by Darwin, were essentially inherited from one’s parents. He grew concerned that eminent British people were marrying late and having too few children. Galton wrote in his 1869 book Hereditary Genius: “Let us do what we can to encourage the multiplication of the races best fitted to invent, and conform to, a high and generous civilisation, and not, out of mistaken instinct of giving support to the weak, prevent the incoming of strong and hearty individuals.”

Galton argued that early marriage between healthy, mentally strong families should be encouraged by financial incentives, and reproduction by the “feeble-minded” should be curtailed. In his mind, superior mental and physical capabilities were advantageous not only to an individual but essential for the well-being of society as a whole. To try to spread his ideas, he even wrote a novel Kantsaywhere, about a society ruled by a Eugenic College that followed a eugenic religion designed to breed fitter, more intelligent humans. Galton’s views were not regarded as eccentric or offensive at the time. Far from it. In fact, he received many awards during his career. He was made a fellow of the Royal Society in 1860 and was knighted shortly before he died.

Galton’s writings played a key role in launching the eugenics movement in the UK and America. Supporters of eugenics called for government policies to improve the biological quality of the human race through selective parenthood. They linked physical and learning disabilities to a range of social problems including crime, vagrancy, alcoholism, prostitution and unemployment. Eugenics quickly gained many backers on both sides of the Atlantic, including leading politicians and opinion formers.

It wasn’t just figures on the extreme right of politics who backed the eugenics philosophy. Some of British socialism’s most celebrated names were among the champions of eugenics – Sidney and Beatrice Webb (the founders of the Fabian Society), Harold Laski, John Maynard Keynes, even the New Statesman and the Manchester Guardian. They hoped that a eugenic approach could build up the strong section of the population and gradually remove the weak. In July 1931, the New Statesman asserted: “The legitimate claims of eugenics are not inherently incompatible with the outlook of the collectivist movement. On the contrary, they would be expected to find their most intransigent opponents amongst those who cling to the individualistic views of parenthood and family economics.”

Many early left-wing thinkers wanted government to direct social policy towards “improving” the human race by discouraging reproduction among those sections of society deemed to have undesirable genes. Supporters of state planning often found the idea of a planned genetic future attractive. As Adrian Wooldridge, author of Measuring the Mind: Education and Psychology in England 1860-1990, comments: “The Webbs supported eugenic planning just as fervently as town planning.” Beatrice Webb declared eugenics to be “the most important question of all” while her husband remarked that “no eugenicist can be a laissez-faire individualist”.

Similarly, George Bernard Shaw wrote: “The only fundamental and possible socialism is the socialisation of the selective breeding of man.” Bertrand Russell proposed that the state should issue colour-coded “procreation tickets” to prevent the gene pool of the elite being diluted by inferior human beings. Those who decided to have children with holders of a different-coloured ticket would be punished with a heavy fine. HG Wells praised eugenics as the first step towards the elimination of “detrimental types and characteristics” and the “fostering of desirable types” instead.

Read rest here

The brave new world is here, written by a Hamilton, NJ Lawyer: Gregory J. Sullivan .

Sullivan writes, In a recent edition of The Wall Street Journal, there were two thoroughly chilling articles that reflect a grave moral transformation that is taking place with virtually no legal regulation or even public concern. The Journal reports on the aggressive use of reproductive technologies that are commodifying children and relegitimizing eugenics. The brave new world is now, in many concrete ways and without exaggeration, our world.

In “Assembling the Global Baby,” the Journal reports on the developing international network of egg and sperm donors and surrogate mothers who provide babies to order. The article concentrates on one particular California company, LLC, which brokers this service. The Journal notes that, because of its international reach “” that is, its willingness to exploit poor women in Third-World countries — PlanetHospital is a comparatively inexpensive option for infertile and homosexual couples: Its “services run from $32,000 to around $68,000, versus up to $200,000 for a U.S. surrogate.”

Indeed, the Journal writes that “PlanetHospital’s most affordable package, the “India bundle,’ buys an egg donor, four embryo transfers into four separate surrogate mothers, room and board for the surrogate, and a car and driver for the parents-to-be when they travel to India to pick up the baby.”

The “parents-to-be” can be anyone who has the money to buy the service. The standards are not, to say the least, exacting. PlanetHospital’s chief executive is a cretin named Rudy Rupak. “‘Our ethics are agnostic,’ Mr. Rupak says in an example of his moral rigor. “How do you prevent a pedophile from having a baby? If they’re a pedophile, then I will leave that to the U.S. government to decide, not me.'” Still, even Rupak found a point beyond which he would not go: “In one case, he suspected a woman wanted to use her own eggs and her son’s sperm. “Whatever the case was, these people weren’t honest. It worried us, so we said no.'”

The potential for abuse on many levels is big,” according to Arthur Caplan, the tiresomely omnipresent director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania, in an obtuse and almost comical understatement. “You’re straddling all these [international] boundaries to buy the ingredients and the equipment.” Caplan refers to this area as the “wild, wild West of medicine.”

It certainly is. More important, our enslavement to reproductive technologies has thrust us into the wild, wild West of moral understanding. And the radicality of our predicament is clear in the Journal’s second article, “Donors With Dossiers (and Star Looks).”

When a child is transformed from gift to commodity and the “parents” treated as consumers, then consumer choice becomes paramount. When it comes to children, that means eugenics “” in other words, genetically selective breeding to create the best possible baby. American elites enthusiastically pursued eugenics in the early 20th century. Once the Nazi regime revealed where this enthusiasm led, the popularity of eugenics receded in this country. With the explosion in reproductive technologies in recent decades, it has come roaring back.

In its companion article, the Journal looks at California Cryobank, which is a sperm bank. The eugenic aspect is paramount: “Last month, California Cryobank began selling donor information packages, on top of free information like medical histories and personal information. For $145, customers can buy three months of access to detailed profiles, childhood photos and a feature called “Express Yourself,’ which allows the donor to write anything from a letter to poetry.”

The Journal continues: “On California Cryobank’s website, a “Celebrity Look-A-Like’ section lets women choose from a long list, including approximations of Adam Sandler, Bill Gates, Andy Gibb, Ben Affleck, Garth Brooks, Colin Firth and Conan O’Brien.”

Silly, to be sure, but this selection process is anything but silly. It will become increasingly ruthless as more genetic traits “” height, eye and hair color, health potential, intelligence “” become more precisely identifiable. Couples who reproduce by copulation will be seen increasingly as ignorant consumers who deserve what they get.

Children as consumer products; parents as consumers of these products. We are not headed in this direction; we have reached this destination. The issue is whether we have the moral wherewithal to resist a complete envelopment in this consumerist and Darwinian universe and maintain at least a residual commitment to the intrinsic worth of children and the integrity of reproduction.

And I again remind you of the powerful Eugenics documentary: Maafa21, which shows how Darwin, Galton, and the Elites are trying to control reproduction of the so-called ” Unfit”

Health Care author Says ObamaCare Will Eventually ‘Control the People’

Posted in Death Panels, Eugenics, Health Care, Politics with tags , , , , , , , , , on October 12, 2010 by saynsumthn

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Health Care Says ObamaCare Will Eventually ‘C…, posted with vodpod

SHOCK: Pro-Abort Health Care Author John Dingell Trails in Democrat Stronghold

By Peter J. Smith

DEARBORN, Michigan, October 12, 2010 ( – Democrat Congressman John Dingell is the longest current serving member in the U.S. Congress, but a shocking poll shows that the author of the House version of health care reform is trailing a pro-life GOP opponent for the first time in his almost 55-year-long legislative career.

Dingell represents the 15th Michigan District, a Democrat stronghold based in Dearborn and Detroit suburbs, where working class Democrats have always returned Dingell to office since 1955 – when he won a special election to fill his deceased father’s seat – with hefty margins.

Only once, during the 1994 GOP takeover of Congress, did Dingell poll beneath 60 percent – at 59 percent.

Now an independent poll shows pro-life Ann Arbor cardiologist Rob Steele beating the 84-year-old incumbent by a small margin in the district. This is raising alarm bells for national Democrats that 2010 could be a far worse electoral year for them than the 1994 “Republican Revolution.”

The Detroit Free Press reports that the GOP’s Steele leads Dingell in this race by four points, 43.8 percent to 39.5 percent. Just 11 percent remain undecided in this poll, which has a +/- 5.6 percent margin of error. Steele is running on the GOP ticket against Dingell and is endorsed by Michigan Right to Life.

Dingell’s campaign has denounced the poll as GOP-motivated number crunching, but the Free Press reports that the poll was a joint effort of two firms with very different political leanings: the CEO of Team TelCom has Republican ties, while the CEO of the Rossman Group has Democratic ones.

“The Dean of the House will be tough to beat, but these numbers show that at this point, even The Dean is not immune to the anger that is brewing with the electorate,” said Kelly Rossman-McKinney, CEO of the Rossman Group.

The Congressman himself indicated a month ago that he knew he was in trouble, even as the latest polls showed him leading Steele by almost 20 points.

A fundraising letter leaked by Politico showed Dingell was requesting his backers to make “your maximum financial contribution to my campaign” this year. He cited an internal GOP poll circulated by Steele’s camp, showing the pro-life challenger was within just a few points of Dingell.

Politico reported at the time that the latest available campaign finance records showed Dingell had about seven times the cash in his war chest as his opponent. Dingell had $904,000 raised by mid-July, while Steele was only surpassing the $116,000 mark.

According to the Cook Political Report, Democrats have only 141 solid seats, and are stretched thin trying to defend about 115 seats that are in play this year against the surging Republicans.

Dingell, the Dean of the U.S. House of Representatives, was the primary author of HR 3200, the first House draft of its version of health care reform. He also voted to approve the final Senate version, which has remained very unpopular nationally.

The octogenarian famously told a local radio program soon after the final March 21, 2010 health care vote in the House that the newly enacted Affordable Care Act, called ObamaCare by its critics, aims to “control the people.”

During a contentious summer season of town hall meetings, Dingell had an explosive confrontation with Michigander Mike Sola, who wheeled his 36-year-old son, Scott, who suffers with cerebral palsy, demanding why his son would not be covered under the health-insurance plan.

Sola could be heard making references to statements by Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, Obama’s health policy advisor, that real cost-cutting would be made only by rationing health-care treatment away from the elderly and disabled to the more physically fit, and that anything else was “‘lipstick’ cost control, more for show and public relations than for true change.”

Glenn Beck on FDR’s New Deal Agencies ane Obama’s new agencies

Posted in Obama, Socialism with tags , , , , , , , on October 11, 2010 by saynsumthn

Vodpod videos no longer available.

MUST WATCH….Sorry!!!!!!! But You Must!, posted with vodpod

Ronald Reagan and Those “other” Voices

Posted in Socialism with tags , , on September 20, 2010 by saynsumthn

Vodpod videos no longer available.

“Those Voices Don’t Speak for the Rest of Us”, posted with vodpod

Top 20 Pro-Socialism Sound Bites of Obama, Advisors & Allies | The Blaze

Posted in Obama, Socialism with tags , , , , on September 20, 2010 by saynsumthn

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Obama & The Echo Chamber – Remix, posted with vodpod

Socialism explained by former KGB agent- vintage interview warns America

Former KGB agent Explains Ideological Subversion and brain washing warns America “No place for future dissenters in America”.
Yuri Bezmenov is a former KGB agent and an expert on ideological subversion. He discusses the slow process of demoralization that transformed America from a conservative and mostly homogeneous country into a socially-marxist and egalitarian one.

Interview conducted by Edward Griffin in 1985.

” You cannot change their mind – even if you expose them to authentic information”

“No place for future dissenters in America…In Future these people will be simply squashed – like roaches.”

“Exposure to true information does not matter anymore…Even if I take him by force and show him a concentration camp- he will refuse to believe it, until he is going to receive a kick in his fat bottom.”

The first phase is demoralization. It takes between 15 and 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why so long? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate a generation of students in the target country, and to expose the opposing ideology. In other words, the Marxist-Leninist ideology is being injected into the malleable minds of at least 3 generations of young Americans, without resistance, without being cons-balanced by the basic values of America or American patriotism.

The main activity of the department was to compile huge amounts of information on individuals who were then being used to influence public opinion. Publishers, writers, journalists, actors, educators, professors of political science, MPs, businessmen … Most of these people were divided into two groups: those who supported the policy of the Soviet regime were promoted to positions of power. through the manipulation of public opinion and media. Those who refused the influence of communism in their country, their reputation was ruined. Or they were executed. Physically. Revolution forces.


Yuri Bezmenov: the useful idiots of socialism

Presented for the first subtitled in French, this interview, although dating from 1985, is a rare news. Yuri Bezmenov, ex-KGB agent spent in the West in the 1970 recounts in detail the techniques of destabilization and manipulation of public opinion.

This interview can understand why, in 2007, we still contend with a left lunar why so many teachers continue to undermine formatted generations of schoolchildren and students and why the fight against Marxist socialism, despite all the evidence its harmfulness, is always on the agenda.

Yuri Bezmenov shows how the socialist-communist bloc:
• knowingly implemented a comprehensive manipulation of public opinion and elites worldwide.
• conditioned schoolchildren and students to Western socialist ideals on at least three generations. This task was in his 85% of the activity of the KGB.
• systematically recruited all opinion leaders in the West for influence and destabilize the non-Communist world.
• conditioned and “de-moralized” (loss of value) of entire sections of society, become “useful idiots” of socialism.

In a lecture he remains traces on the Internet, Yuri Bezmenov – aka Thomas Schuman – gave further guidance on techniques designed to destabilize the western nations. Among these strategies of destabilization, he cites include:

• sabotage units of national, ethnic, racial, religious, linguistic
• ridicule of patriotism by degrading the level of a mental illness (psychotic)
• encouragement of the political turmoil in the world of work by politicizing the trade unions.

We have thus far both feet in and we have not changed the world: we’re still the heirs of the Cold War. It is now inside the tent of disease spread. And the “useful idiots” are also still active.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Soviet Subversion of the Free World Press – 1984, posted with vodpod

Video Translation here

Full Interview Below

Demoralization of America

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about "Demoralization of America", posted with vodpod

Judd Gregg tells CNBC’s Larry Kudlow leaders are ‘trying to run the government into the ditch’ to institute European social welfare model.

Begin @ 5:00minutes

Senator: Obama, Congress ‘Intentionally’ Spending to Force Value-Added Tax Implementation
N.H. Sen.

Judd Gregg tells CNBC’s Larry Kudlow leaders are ‘trying to run the government into the ditch’ to institute European social welfare model.

By Jeff Poor
Business & Media Institute
9/10/2010 5:09:44 PM

We’ve heard from various elements that President Barack Obama was a socialist trying to “fundamentally change” the United States of America in a covert manner, but maybe it isn’t as covert as it seems.

A recent CNS News analysis of government data shows that in the first 19 months of the Obama administration, the federal debt held by the public increased by $2.5260 trillion – more than the cumulative total of the national debt held by the public that was amassed by all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Ronald Reagan. So why is the government doing this? Larry Kudlow asked Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., that question on his Sept. 9 program, suggesting it was a “giant massive tax trap.”

“Senator, instead of going bankrupt, you know what will happen?” Kudlow said. “It’s a massive tax trap. That’s what’s going to happen. It’s going to be a gigantic humongous, massive tax trap that will doom us to subpar, stagnant, slow economic growth and high unemployment. Isn’t that really the issue?”

“Larry, you’re absolutely right,” Gregg said. “This is a very important point for your viewers to understand. This spending is being done intentionally. The reason the GDP –the spending-to-GDP ratio has gone from 20 percent to 24 percent, it’s heading to 27 percent of GDP is because the present government, the present presidency and the present Congress genuinely believe that you create prosperity by radically growing the size of government and they genuinely believe that our society is fundamentally under-taxed and they want to fill the gap between what has historically been our tax revenues, which have been about 18 to 19 percent of GDP and the spending, which they put in place at 24 percent.”

“They want to fill it with a value added tax,” Gregg continued. “That is the plan. They’re trying to run the government into the ditch so that the options will be so few and so Draconian and so inappropriate that the only choice that would be left would be to go down the European social welfare mode. Remember, every European country has an income tax, a sales tax, which is their VAT tax, and what they see is the United States only has an income tax. So they say, ‘Well, we can obviously take the European model. If we go down the European road of expanding our government dramatically,’ which is what they’re planning to do and what they’ve actually done with the health care bill specifically, ‘Then we can fill that gap without going down the European model of a VAT tax.’”