Archive for Optimum Population

Fewer Kids, More Abortions, Better Environment

Posted in Abortion, birth control, Black Genocide, Constitution, Darwin, Environment, Eugenics, Evolution, Holdren, Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood, Population Control, Racism, Sterilization with tags , , , , , , , , , on September 10, 2009 by saynsumthn

London School of Economics: Fewer Kids, More Abortions, Better Environment

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
September 9, 2009

London, England (LifeNews.com) — A new analysis from the London School of Economics is targeting people who have children as being responsible for destroying the environment. With a population control agenda in mind, its analysis draws the conclusion that fewer children and more abortions means a better environment.

Although the report, entitled Fewer Emitter, Lower Emissions, Less Cost, focuses on “family planning” and contraception, the idea is that fewer children born means the environment will be better off.

Roger Martin, chairman of the Optimum Population Trust at the LSE, is one of the school officials behind the report.

His research indicates contraception is five times cheaper than conventional green technologies in reducing global CO2 emissions. LSE estimates that, for every $4 (UK) spent on contraception and family planning resulting in a reduction of emissions by one ton equals the same reduction as $19 (UK) spent on green technologies.

Martin says 34 gigatons (billion tons) of CO2 would be saved if nations did more to push population control by promoting contraception and abortion.

“It’s always been obviously that total emissions depend on the number of emitters as well as their individual emissions – the carbon tonnage can’t shoot down as we want, while the population keeps shooting up,” Martin complained in comments to the London Telegraph.

He points to UN data suggesting that aggressive population control could reduce unintended births by 72 percent.

However, other research shows nations are experiencing a birth dearth that is causing a host of social and economic problems.

“Worldwide, birthrates have declined by 50% in the past half-century,” the film Demographic Winter notes. “There are now 59 nations, with 44% of the world’s population, with below replacement birthrates.”

A birthrate of 2.1 is needed to replace current population, but the European Union has a birthrate of just 1.3. By 2030, Europe is expected to have a shortfall of 20 million workers.

Barry McLerran, the producer of the film, previously told LifeNews.com that it “shows what happens when countries comprising 80% of the world’s economy have plummeting numbers of workers, consumers and innovators – leading to falling consumer spending, and too few workers to support the elderly.”

Meanwhile, in Russia, where abortion has been used for decades as a method of birth control, the nation is expected to lose one- third of its current population by 2050.

Related web sites:
Demographic Winter – http://www.demographicwinter.org

HERE ARE THE OPT RECOMMENDATIONS:
OPT recommends that climate change negotiators:
a) Recognize that population restraint is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition for the solution of the problems caused by climate change;
b) Accept the need for all countries to adopt non-coercive population policies;
c) Accept programs to implement such policies in poorer countries as legitimate candidates for climate change funding;
d) Give immediate priority to meeting the existing unmet demand for family reproductive health care in the poorest countries;
e) recognize that programs educating and empowering women to control their own fertility are also essential for the success of population restraint programmes;
f) Take account of the major humanitarian benefit of lower fertility in relieving the suffering of many of the poorest women and children in the world.
And also:
That the principle of “contraction and convergence” (rich and poor converging towards a common per person emissions target) be accepted as an equitable starting point for distributing total tolerable carbon emissions, provided that this is allocated to states on the basis of their population size at a specific date. This would encourage the adoption of population restraint policies; whereas allocation on a simple per person criterion would encourage continued population growth, thus continuously reducing every person’s carbon entitlement.

Population Control = abortion !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Also read this blog for information on Obama’s Science CZar and his population control agenda.

Controlling Black Population: Conspiracy Theory or Fact?

Posted in Abortion, birth control, Black Genocide, Constitution, Darwin, Elaine Riddick, Eugenics, Health Care, Hitler, Holdren, Maafa21, Margaret Sanger, Nazi, New World Order, Pastor Stephen Broden, Planned Parenthood, Racism, Sterilization with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 2, 2009 by saynsumthn

Below is a list of quotes from the past – YOU DECIDE !

The number of contraceptive clinics rose from 34 in 1930 to 803 in 1942. In three states North Carolina, South Carolina, and Alabama- public health authorities have taken the most lead in bringing birth control clinics to rural areas, where they are the most needed. ( SOURCE: An American Dilemma; the Negro problem and Modern Democracy by: Gunnar Myrdal, 1944; Harper and Brothers Publishers; New York P. 178)

In 1942 the name of the Margaret Sanger’s American Birth Control League, was changed to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Planned Parenthood is the nation’s largest abortion provider and has most of it’s clinics in minority neighborhoods.

In 1958, State Representative of Mississippi David H Glass sponsored a sterilization bill.
He was angered by black women who made it a business to give birth to illegitimate children and collected welfare assistance for them. Glass wanted to “ stop, or slow down, such traffic at its source.” According to Mississippi’s The Delta Democrat-Times, Glass said it was designed to limit the number if illegitimate Negro children. Four times more Black children than Whites were receiving Aid to Families with Dependent Children in Mississippi in the early 60’s. ( SOURCE: Genocide? Birth Control and the Black American by Robert G. Weisbord: Greenwoord Press, 1975; PP. 141-142 and The Delta Democrat-Times, Bill would have unwed mothers sterilized: 2/7/1958; P2)

In 1960, Nelson A Howard, JR. , Pasadena Planned Parenthood Committee, Drive Chairman, said,
For every 1000 unwanted pregnancies Planned Parenthood helps avoid in indigent families, tax payers save more than a million dollars a year.” ( In 1965, He was named area co-chairman of the second nationwide campaign of Planned Parenthood- World Population)
( SOURCE: Pasadena Independent: Tax Saving cited by Birth Club: 2/4/1960, P. 19)

As [ Margaret] Sanger , ( Founder of Planned Parenthood), allied herself with the burgeoning eugenics movement, the call for birth control veered away from its radical, feminist origins to include programs to regulate the poor, immigrants and blacks, based on theories of genetic inferiority and social degeneracy. Some blacks of the period, including the nationalist leader Marcus Garvey, opposed birth control as a form of “race suicide.” ( SOURCE: Alan Guttmacher, Family Planning Perspectives, Volume 32, Number 2, March/April 2000 :Forum: Black Women and the Pill, By Dorothy Roberts )

In 1965, Langston Hughes wrote in his column, “ White folks are not thinking about being sterilized, neither in war nor peace. It is India, China, Africa and Harlem they is considering- 300 million dollars worth of birth control for us! You know I really do believe white folks has got something up their sleeve for colored folks. Yes, they has.” ( SOURCE: Population Explosion, by Langston Hughes, NY Post : 12/10/1965)

In 1965, At the White House Conference on Civil Rights sponsored by Lyndon Johnson, Cecil Moore of the NAACP, made this attack on population control, “ And I have noticed that every time that we talk about population and planned parenthood, the only country I find that wants to limit poverty by limiting the poor- they always want to do it in Africa and South America and Asia , but I never heard them talk about doing it in Paris or England. Then I hope I am not belaboring the point, but don’t take that away from Negroes because we don’t have much else.” ( SOURCE: The Historical Journal, Vol. 41, No. 1 ( Mar., 1998) pp. 259-282, The 1966 White House Conference on Civil Rights, by Kevin L. Yuill, quoting transcript records of the WHCCR)

In 1968, this was reported in the Press-Courier: Many black militants also see the government’s participation in birth control programs as “black genocide.” As one militant put it to this column: “Whitey is trying to get us before we’re born.”
In some U. S. cities, the government finances clinics where disadvantaged persons get instruction in family planning and are given contraceptives free of charge. In other places,
Government finances programs to promote birth control.
( SOURCE: THE PRESS-COURIER, PAGE FOUR Thursday, Sept, 12, 1968)

In a March 1968 article in Ebony Magazine, Douglas Stewart, Director of the National Office of Community Relations of Planned Parenthood spoke of the fear of genocide against blacks, “Many Negro women have told our workers, There are two kinds of pills – one for white women and one for us…and the one for us causes sterilization. This is a very real fear for some women’” (SOURCE: Ebony Magazine, Birth Control and the Negro Woman, By Mary Smith: March 1968; PP. 29-37 )

In December of 1969, President Richard Nixon’s White House Conference on Food and Nutrition, was a farce. Not only did it dash the hopes of the hungry in a way unprecedented, it also succeeded in advancing- against strong sentiments of the poor at the conference- the administration’s own program of imposing birth control on the Blackpoor . ..His [ Nixon’s] primary concern was obviously toward reducing the number of hungry-not hunger itself.
There appeared inadvertently in the press room during the first morning of the conference a working paper of the panel on the “Pregnant and Nursing Women and Infants”, which was the first panel under a section titled “Establishing Guidelines for the Nutrition of Vulnerable Groups ( With Special Reference to the Poor).” …First and foremost , that panel was following the same wish devoutly expressed by the President, himself: Birth Control. What this panel concocted for tacit approval and adoption by the conference of poor and hungry people was a cleverly phrased recommendation that Congress pass a law providing for:
Making birth control information and devices available to any and all girls over the age of 13 who requested them , with or without the permission of parents.
Mandatory abortion for any such unmarried girl found to be pregnant and within the first three months of that pregnancy
Mandatory sterilization of any such girl giving birth out of wedlock for a second time.
A look at the panel itself showed only one black person present</strong
Mrs. Fannie Lou Hamer asked whether she would favor such birth control measures proposed by Dr. Lowe’s panel, she responded with shock and disappointment, “ What? What are you talking about? Birth Control? I didn’t come here to talk about birth control. I came here to get some food to feed poor, hungry people. Where are they carrying on that kind of talk?

( SOURCE: The Choice: The Issue of Black Survival in America, by Samuel F. Yette, Cottage Book, 1971; PP.109-115)

In a 1970, in a commencement speech at Syracuse University, Julian Bond, said this as the director of the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee, which he helped found. At the time of the speech, he was a member of the Board of Trustees of the Southern Conference Education Fund, of the Advisory Board of the proposed Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Library, and of the Executive Committee of the Atlanta NAACP. Bond suggested that the intense interest in the ‘population bomb” could lead to genocide of black Americans and other poor people.( SOURCE: Transcript, Commencement address delivered at Syracuse University by Julian Bond on June 6,1970)

In 1970, Paul Ehrlich , author of The Population Bomb, made this statement after the The Black Caucus withdrew from the First National Congress on Optimum Population and Environment,
When you run a white racist society, the minority is bound to express nervousness. If you’re a black man and white are talking about birth control, it’s natural for you to conclude that they mean to control black population.” (SOURCE: The Register: Blacks couldn’t cope with COPE: 6/15/1970)

In a recent survey of 500 black Americans, only half believed that the government tells the truth about the safety and side effects of new birth control methods.
Birth control conspiracy theories still affect the use of birth control by black men and women, according to a study reported in the latest issue of the journal Health Education and Behavior.
One-third of participants of the telephone survey said that medical institutions use poor and minority people as “guinea pigs”to try out new birth control methods, according to study authors Sheryl Thorburn of Oregon State University and Laura Bogart of the Rand Corporation. Substantial numbers of those surveyed also believed that the government uses birth control as a way to control the black population in America. Almost a quarter of those surveyed agreed that “poor and minority women are sometimes forced to be sterilized by the government”, while 22 percent agreed that “the government’s family planning policies are intended to control the number of Black people.
( SOURCE: Health Behavior News Service , Conspiracy Theories Affect Birth Control Use by Black Men and Women , By Becky Ham, Science Writer: 8/9/2005)
Study:Conspiracy beliefs about birth control: barriers to pregnancy prevention among African Americans of reproductive age. Health Education & Behavior

Check out this documentary for more shocking facts: Maafa21