Archive for Illegal Abortion

Abortionist under investigation after police seize “human tissue” in car

Posted in Aborted Baby Trash, Abortion and Drugs, Abortion lawsuit, Abortionist, Abortionist arrested, Abortionist Investigated, Abortionist loses medical license, Abortionists and Dogs with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 19, 2015 by saynsumthn

A Metro Detroit abortionist is the subject of a Federal investigation on suspicion he performed illegal abortions.

Michael Roth

According to a local news station, police in West Bloomfield said that a search warrant was executed at the home and office of Dr. Michael Roth, a long time abortion provider in the state.

Reports indicate the case stemmed from an accident the abortionist had a few weeks prior where he allegedly hit a special needs child while driving his vehicle.

Michael Roth abortion fetus containers

Sources confirmed to WXYZ that police found 14 containers of human tissue, possibly fetuses, medical equipment and large amounts of Fentanyl, a drug used for pain and sedation, in his car. Police impounded the vehicle where they found unlabeled plastic containers and medical equipment in the trunk.

Michael ROth police search

In addition to the search warrants on the abortion doctor’s home and office, police also executed a search warrant to obtain the “black box” data recorder from the car, news sources state. The containers were taken to the Oakland County Medical Examiner’s Office for evaluation.

Lynn Mills 162752_000_GI89G63UR.1-0

According to Lynn Mills, a local pro-life activist, Roth is a circuit rider who has worked at several Michigan abortion clinics. Mills said that although Roth had an office for many years, he also performed abortions for notorious Michigan abortionists like Jacob Kalo and Abraham Hodari.

She told said that in May of 2014, Roth moved his offices of 25 years to another location on 12 Mile Road in Novi where she immediately began notifying the building owner and tenants about the abortionist’s history.

Michael Roth Novi

I knew it was time to push the subject and I decided I didn’t need many people to expose Roth, ” she said.

“All I used were legal documents showing Roth’s questionable activity and substandard care.”

Mills said that in 2004 Roth was placed on probation by the State’s Bureau of Health Professions for performing abortions out of the home of one of his patients.

In 2012, the Michigan Board of Medicine issued Roth a $2,000 fine for negligence, incompetence, and lack of good moral character, after violating public health codes in two abortion procedures, and perforating a woman’s uterus.

Roth is also listed as a defendant in several abortion related lawsuits. Mills said abortion is only part of Roth’s questionable practices. He was also cited for mishandling drugs and storing them in an insecure location at his alleged weight-loss business. In 2002, the state cited Roth for improperly labeling and possession of expired drugs and also noted that his controlled substance license had not been renewed since 1981.

Mills described Roth as the atypical sleazy abortionist who is extremely nasty to pro-lifers and the media. She said that Roth has been killing unborn babies since the Rescue days of the late 1980’s. Mills also told pointed out that by the end of last year, Roth had relocated his office a total of three times.

Mills also said that last year she and several pro-lifers picketed a local Catholic Hospital where Roth had privileges. But, Mills reports, that rather than addressing why a Catholic Hospital would allow an abortionist to practice there, Providence Hospital called security on the demonstrators.

At the time of this story, Roth had not been charged with any crime in the incident although reports indicate the attorney general is looking into the case.

Mills said she will continue to follow-up until Roth’s license is revoked and he is charged with any crimes he has committed. She has urged the public to contact the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) to ask for a summary suspension of Roth’s medical license until a complete investigation can be conducted.

Mills said you can politely contact Michigan LARA at 517-373-1820.

Responding to AHA’s claim pro-lifers focus on “abortion hurts women”

Posted in AHA, Pro-life History with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on April 30, 2015 by saynsumthn

This past weekend a debate between pro-life advocate Gregg Cunningham vs. Abolish Human Abortion advocate T. Russell Hunter took place in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

11164806_881842688548413_8953565359761892780_n

____________________________

The purpose was for each one to defend their view on abortion strategy: Incrementalism vs. Immediatism.

I am not going to address the entire debate in this blog post.

For those interested, pro-life blogger, Jill Stanek has analyzed the debate in a series of blog posts here which I recommend.

The purpose of this blog post is to address two statements made by Hunter.

Gregg Russell prolife vs AHA abortion Debate

During the debate, Hunter makes claims that pro-life strategy of working towards complete abolition of abortion and accepting gradual or incremental methods to save every baby possible along the way is sin.

Then Hunter implies that pro-life people do not call the sinner to repent for abortion. This is one of the statement’s I wish to address here.

Hunter says, “You notice the difference between an immediatist and an incrementalist, in that an immediatists says abortion is sin turn to God and goes out daily and to that work.” (Note: The last three words of Hunter’s statement are hard to make out from the audio, but I think I caught them correctly, please notify me if I am incorrect.)

TR Debate AHA

Hunter ran through his points so quickly that I believe that they are worth reviewing. Let’s pause there for a moment and analyze what Hunter is implying.

The comments begin at 58:29 of the debate video – here if you want to hear them.

First the statement, “an immediatists says abortion is sin turn to God” is intentionally designed to imply that anyone who claims the name “pro-life” and supports “incremental” strategies does not believe that abortion is sin or proclaim that society needs to turn to God.

This is an utterly ignorant and rather insulting statement.

The pro-life movement is made up of a large number of Bible believing Christian people. I would be in that group.

I understand the ignorance of a person who only recently joined the fight to end abortion while claiming to be a Christian for many years. But, just because Hunter and many of his followers have decided to responded to the Biblical mandate to “rescue those being led to the slaughter” does not mean history on this movement began with them.

As much as Hunter would like to re-write the history of the pro-life movement he did not live it as many many pro-lifers did and can now testify as first hand witnesses.

But to the point at hand, there is ample evidence past and present that the call to repentance was and is given within the pro-life community.

This 2001 letter to the editor is just one example:

US Repent 2001 abortion

_______________________________________________

The 1980’s rescues were also public calls for not only the church to repent from abortion apathy, but also for society to do the same. No AHA meme, statement, or fancy design can erase that history.

225488_174509399274400_7414355_n

___________________________________

Moving on…

The second part of Hunter’s statement which I’d like to address is as follows:

    Incrementalists say things like abortion hurts women. It does. But the focus is on, it hurts women not abortion kills babies, even though they recognize that abortion kills babies.”

Again- that is a preposterous statement.

Abortion Hurts Women Debate

The very images collected by the pro-life community, which Hunter now uses in all his effective social media memes, is proof that the focus is on the fact that abortion kills babies.

In addition, I have also documented that pure legislation to defend the preborn and outlaw all abortions was put forth via Human Life Amendments during the early days. That documentation can be found here.

Having said that, there is nothing wrong with saying that abortion hurts women. Hunter, for all his protesting, admits it in fact does. Is not truth- truth?

I will give Hunter the benefit of the doubt on this topic because again, the AHA leader chose to get into this fierce fight after abortion had been legal for a number of years, so he is rather ignorant of historical battles, ideas, and lies that the pro-life community has had to dismantle for the past 42 years.

Those who are new to the abortion battle may not realize that the abortion lobby made major inroads by painting illegal abortion as “unsafe” causing women to die.

It is simple logic to counter the lie that helped legalize abortion with the truth, which is that women still die from abortion and legalization does not necessarily make abortions safe.

Keep abortion safe and legal

The lies:

NARAL Pin

    Millions of women died from illegal abortions.

    If you make abortions illegal, women will die.

Case in point, during the debate to liberalize abortion in New York, the issue of unsafe abortions swayed one representative to change his vote on the floor, opening the door to abortion on demand in that state.

NY Constance Cook

Assemblywoman Constance E. Cook stood to the floor during that 1970 debate to push the lie of unsafe abortion, stating, “I submit that we have abortion on demand in the state of New York right now. Any woman that wants an abortion can get one–if she has $25, she has it done here, under the most abominable circumstances,” and that prohibition only drives abortion underground.”

This clip from the film “Choice at Risk” gives a historical glimpse :

Repealing Abortion Laws (4:18) from Dorothy Fadiman on Vimeo.

The deciding vote was cast by Democrat Assemblyman, George Michaels, who told the LA Times that for years he had been told by local party leaders not to vote for the repeal of the abortion ban, and he pledged not to. For two years he had followed the party line.

ASSY George Michaels cast vote to legalize abortion

    I would vote no, hoping the bill would pass,” he said. “I was not doing the right thing.”

    In April, 1970, the night before he left for Albany, Michaels spent an evening with his daughter-in-law, Sarah.

    Sarah asked him what would happen when the abortion bill came up for a vote again. There was a chance it would pass, he told her.

    What if it doesn’t?” she asked.

    Maybe next year,” he said.

    Michaels says he has never been able to forget what his son’s young wife told him next:

    In the meantime, thousands of women will be mutilated and die because of that stupid Legislature.

    Boy, that rocked me,” Michaels says. “That rocked me.”

The National Abortion Rights Action League, NARAL, also lied about women dying from illegal abortions. One of their early founders, Dr. Bernard Nathanson, who later repented of his pro-abortion actions and views, described what they did early on:

Bernard Nathanson

    “We persuaded the media that the cause of permissive abortion was a liberal, enlightened, sophisticated one,” recalls the movement’s co-founder. “Knowing that if a true poll were taken, we would be soundly defeated, we simply fabricated the results of fictional polls. We announced to the media that we had taken polls and that 60 percent of Americans were in favor of permissive abortion. This is the tactic of the self-fulfilling lie. Few people care to be in the minority. We aroused enough sympathy to sell our program of permissive abortion by fabricating the number of illegal abortions done annually in the U.S. The actual figure was approaching 100,000, but the figure we gave to the media repeatedly was 1,000,000.”

McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, Robert P. George breaks it down further when he writes this about the NARAL founder:

    Nathanson and his friends lied—relentlessly and spectacularly—about the number of women who died each year from illegal abortions. Their pitch to voters, lawmakers, and judges was that women are going to seek abortion in roughly equal numbers whether it is lawful or not. The only effect of outlawing it, they claimed, is to limit pregnant women to unqualified and often uncaring practitioners, “back alley butchers.” So, Nathanson and others insisted, laws against abortion are worse than futile: they do not save fetal lives; they only cost women’s lives.

abortion-rally-1970s

For clarification, stats show that, in the year prior to Roe, the CDC disputed the lie that thousands of women died from illegal abortion as shown in this table from their surveillance report on abortion.

cdc-illegal-abortion-deaths

So, to summarize, just because Hunter says that the pro-life movement does not focus on “abortion kills babies” does not make it so.

When the pro-life community documents that abortion is not safe for women it does not automatically mean they do not focus on the fact that abortion kills babies. For many of us, we are able to articulate multiple facts.

In addition, because AHA leaders claim that pro-lifers do not call abortion sin, does not make the claim true either as I stated above.

However, in my personal study of scripture, I do not see every effort to dialogue or convey truth being preceded by the command “repent.”

King Solomon, himself was conflicted when he was forced to determine who the mother of a baby brought before him was. He did not tell the two women squabbling to repent of their actions. Instead the wise King appealed to the heart of the true mother:

The NIV version of the events in I Kings is detailed below:

    The king said, “This one says, ‘My son is alive and your son is dead,’ while that one says, ‘No! Your son is dead and mine is alive.’”

    Then the king said, “Bring me a sword.” So they brought a sword for the king. 25 He then gave an order: “Cut the living child in two and give half to one and half to the other.”

    The woman whose son was alive was deeply moved out of love for her son and said to the king, “Please, my lord, give her the living baby! Don’t kill him!”

    But the other said, “Neither I nor you shall have him. Cut him in two!”

    Then the king gave his ruling: “Give the living baby to the first woman. Do not kill him; she is his mother.”

In the story above, the true mother, the one who cared for and loved the baby, was willing to compromise to save her child’s life.

Think about that for a while, as you ponder the debate !

86 the coat hanger suggests abortion advocate

Posted in Coat Hanger Abortion Spin, Illegal abortion, RH Reality Blog with tags , , , , , , on March 1, 2015 by saynsumthn

Cynthia R. Greenlee over at the RH Reality blog, a venue for radically pro-abortion ideology, thinks the abortion rights movement needs to move beyond the iconic coat hanger symbol.

The young activist for the legalization of child killing in the womb asks, “Beyond the Coat Hanger: What’s Next for Abortion Rights Iconography?”

CoatHangerButtonil_570xN.303036483

“Since the invention and consumerization of the ultrasound, the fetus has taken center stage…” Greenlee writes of pro-lifers.

Abortion rights activists may have a harder job in creating a symbolic language. How do you convey the state of abortion access—legal but increasingly restricted—visually?” she states.

Greenlee seems rather concerned that the only symbol the abortion rights crowd uses consistently is the coat hanger, noting that younger activists do not have the same emotion toward that symbol.

As much I hate to admit it, the coat hanger doesn’t resonate with me or many other people my age or younger,” she says.

Coat Hanger images

For many in the reproductive rights movement, the coat hanger is more than a commonplace closet item. Activists use it to memorialize those girls and women who turned to unsafe abortions out of desperation when abortion was illegal. It transforms into shorthand for “Never again.”

Coat Hanger march-life-abortion

“Although the symbol resurfaces throughout the year, it becomes a frequent sight around the January anniversary of Roe v. Wade. As I saw coat hanger references earlier this year, I felt an odd dissonance. I knew what I was supposed to feel: outrage, sadness, and a renewed commitment to reproductive justice. Instead, though, I only felt unmoved and then unnerved. For me, and many others born after Roe, the fixation on coat hangers as the prevailing iconography of the reproductive rights movement excludes the possibility of alternatives that are more relevant to current struggles.”

Greenlee correctly points out that not all illegal abortions were unsafe,”as durable as the images of the coat hanger or dangerous back-alley procedure may be, not all illegal abortions were unsafe; many were performed by trained clinicians working outside the law,” she states.

CDC Illegal ABortion Deaths

Although the abortion lobby wants people to believe that illegal abortion killed millions of women, they do not have the stats to back up their claims. In fact, in the year prior to Roe a very small number of women died from illegal abortion.

Despite all their rhetoric, it is becoming more and more difficult to convince the American public that abortion is safe, when women are dropping dead from legal abortions.

ct-ct-abortion-death1-jpg-20150216

The truth is that abortion pushers can’t 86 the coat hanger, because, as much as it was the tool they used to con the public into accepting abortion prior to Roe – it has remained a tool to keep abortion legal.

TN Death List

There is a growing list of women who are lying dead after believing the lie that legalizing abortion made it safe. The names of these pro-choice dead women haunt abortion supporters who refuse to acknowledge their tragic end.

Despite the fact that women are bleeding to death from legal abortion inside Planned Parenthood or are abused and butchered at the neighborhood abortion clinic with no emergency carts available Greenlee and her crowd are doomed to the coat hanger symbol as a diversion to the bloodshed that goes on today.

Radical abortion advocates arrested blocking March for Life

Posted in Stop Patriarchy with tags , , , , , , , , , , on January 22, 2015 by saynsumthn

Since I am not at the March for Life, this may be a sketchy report, however, members of the radical communist pro-abortion group, Stop Patriarchy, have been arrested trying to counter protest the March for Life.

Stop Patriarchy MFL abortion 2015

Capture2

Stop Patriarchy 4

Stop Patriarchy March for Life 3

Stop Patriarchy March for Life 4

Stop Patriarchy March for Life 5

Stop Patriarchy March for Life arrests

According to tweets, 10 Stop Patriarchy activists were arrested in D.C. after they blocked the march for about 40 minutes.

The group stood in front of hundreds of thousands of pro-lifers mourning the death of millions upon millions of unborn babies chanting, “Forced motherhood is female enslavement,” while pro-life marchers chanted “We are the pro-life generation.”

MFL 2015 Stop Patriarchy

MFL Stop Patriarchy blocks march

A tweet from the group Revolution Club, states, “Shoutout to Stop Patriarchy for puttin bodies on line – bringin March4life to halt in #DC on #Roe42 #7in10forRoe.”

Stop Patriarchy RevCon

Stop Patriarchy’s radical leader, Sunsara Taylor, tweeted this, “Anti abortion woman haters stopped in their tracks today! Several arrested standing up for women.”

arrested Stop Patriarchy

The group had planned on protests in several cities where pro-lifers were gathering today for the anniversary of the infamous Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion on demand.

Also on their radar today is Oakland, California, where Black pro-life preachers will have a rally to expose the racist agenda of abortion and Black genocide. (more here).

Interviews with the radicals emerged on YouTube:

The group likes to refer their supporters WAYYYYY back to the days of illegal abortion, when they “claim” with little proof, that thousands of women died prior to it’s legalization.

March For Life Sto Patriarchy Silent no More

To rev up their handful of supporters and their keep “Abortion on Demand” mantra going- they carry around posters of women they “claim” died from illegal abortions.

The only problem is- women still die from abortion.

Sunsara Taylor and her blind followers conveniently leave out these women (names of hundreds of them here) pictures of a few below:

Tonya Reaves _3399880429594703002_n

Marla Cardamone 6290391080156371872_n

Lakish Wilson 8846_450713531525543038_n

Karnamaya Mongar 54595105518_548576735226104803_n

1512662_683054625105515_6197721504249214436_n

When illegal abortion operators bribed the police

Posted in Illegal abortion with tags , , , , , on December 30, 2014 by saynsumthn

Prior to the legalization of abortion, some operators bribed the police in order to stay in business.

Under the sub title: The Abortion Racket, a 1966 Dade County Grand Jury final report reads:

The grand jury feels that officers of the law should not be permitted to enrich themselves from payoffs from either doctors of patients on abortion cases. The grand jury has not been able to adequately investigate the abortion racket in the county, but finds that there is evidence tending to prove that officers of the law have been forcing physicians to pay bribes in order to escape arrest and protection for having committed abortions and to permit them to continue to do so.

Abortion Racket

A 1967 Miami News story indicated that two Miami police officers were ordered to stand trial in an abortion bribe case. The charges alleged the two took $5500 in bribes from two abortionists.

Miami 1967 abortion police bribe

In 1970, a Detroit abortion clinic was caught giving bribes to police so they could continue operating. A Ludington, Michigan paper reports that even a newly appointed police chief was allegedly in on the scam.

The paper says the Detroit Free Press had reported that a former teamsters union attorney had admitted personally delivering Mafia bribes of $1000.00 a month to three top ranking police from one abortion clinic.

Detroit police bribe abortion

In 1966, a Miami abortionist was arrested an accused of attempting to bribe a police officer. Dr Luis Barquet Bulas offered the police officer $4000.00 to let him go the Miami News reported. The abortion doctor had a 36 state alert out for his arrest after bribing police officers in New York for $50,000.

1966 Miami abortionists bribe

In 1951, an illegal abortionist says his arrest was the result of his refusal to pay a bribe to a Portland police officer.

Portland abortion police bribe

In 1956, a bail bondsman and a lawyer were accused of attempting to bribe a Miami judge in an abortion ring case. They denied the charges.

1956 Miami abortion bribe

Pro-choicers pushing illegal abortions?

Posted in Abortion Film, Abortion Funding, Abortion pill, Illegal abortion, National Network of Abortion Funds, Pro-choice law breakers, Pro-choice support of abortionists with tags , , , , , , , , , on August 20, 2014 by saynsumthn

A pro-choice abortion group has filmed themselves crossing the border to buy Misoprostol, an ulcer drug that is used off-label to induce abortions.

Texas Side Abortion Pills

According to a blog post published by Jill Stanek, Dawn Porter and members of the National Network of Abortion Funds traveled to Texas where they filmed themselves crossing the Mexican border to buy Misoprostol, an ulcer drug that is used off-label to induce abortions.

Group that went for Ab ills May 30 2014

Misoprostol is available only by prescription in the U.S. and can only be dispensed by doctors for abortions. But it can be purchased over-the-counter in Mexico.

Mexico Abortion Pills

After the purchase, NNAF tweeted photos, along with instructions on how to use Misoprostol illegally to self-induce an abortion…

Aquired in mexico May 30 2014

Stanek points out that, now that legal abortion is becoming scarcer in places, proponents are reversing course and promoting the very same illegal abortions they protested against four decades ago.

NNAF actually hosts a web page explaining how to use Misoprostol illegally, with instructions to lie to medical staff at the hospital emergency room one drags herself to.

Abortion Pills

Stanek’s full blog post on this topic is worth reading- see it here.

You may be interested in knowing that the NNAF has confirmed that legal abortion is all about profit anyway- see more in my post here !

Make note that the promotion of unsafe “illegal” abortion has always come from the same crowd tat promotes “legal” abortion.

1966 tape discusses abortion in US before Roe says they are needed for “Negroes, Puerto Ricans”

Posted in Eugenics, Eugenics in Peru, Illegal abortion, Video with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on September 6, 2013 by saynsumthn

Abortion in 1966: Three Men Weigh in On Women’s Rights
Number 43
Thursday, July 12, 2012 – 04:30 PM

Abortion was the topic of this 1966 broadcast of Main Currents, hosted by Lee Graham. Three panelists (all men) used the recent introduction of a bill that would “liberalize” existing abortion restrictions as a springboard for a wide-ranging discussion of the practice both in the United States and abroad, and for exploring the historical basis for such restrictions and what the future may hold.

There were no abortion opponents present. Indeed, the only opposition mentioned was the Roman Catholic Church, and even that institution, one of the participants assures, is “approaching a state of fluidity greater than what we’ve seen in previous years.” This sober, for the most part reasoned, conversation is striking in its contrast to the fanatic rhetoric to come.

The three panelists were Alfred Julien, a trial lawyer conversant with the abortion law and how the proposed bill (introduced by State Senator Percy Sutton) would change access to abortions; Dr. Robert Hall, an obstetrician; and Lawrence Lader, a journalist who would become well known as a crusader for women’s reproductive rights. Currently, Hall explains, a legal abortion can only be performed to preserve the life, but not the health, of the mother. This crucial distinction, he argues, “prevents us from practicing good medicine.” Julien, the lawyer, calls the present law “harsh and restrictive.” Lader, instead of focusing narrowly on the legal or medical aspects of the debate, sees abortion as a civil rights issue. He quotes Margaret Sanger, who said, “No woman can call herself free who does not own and control her own body.”

Lader was a major voice in the abortion debate for four decades, becoming a lightning rod for its critics as well as a beacon for its proponents. He wrote influential books and articles on the subject, organized ministers to refer women wanting abortions to doctors as well as referring 2,000 himself, helped found what was long known as the National Abortion Rights Action League and helped win New York State’s repeal of abortion restrictions in 1970.

Listen to the interview here: http://www.wnyc.org/blogs/neh-preservation-project/2012/jul/12/abortion-legal-medical-and-historical-perspectives/

10:00– Keeping Birth Rate DOWN !

In Japan for ex, an easy abortion is their method of keeping the birthrate down…

The law is called the Eugenic Protection Act, the law was not passed as a birth control act.

10:48

the fact that in some places they have controlled populations is in fact inconsequential

ILLEGAL ABORTIONS: 11:40

Dr. Hall asked about 1 million illegal ab’s, moderator asks, how is that figure arrived at?

Kinsey Research Inst 11:40– which in surveying thousands of women found …explains illegal abortion reporting…we don’t know exactly how many illegal legal abortions are done of course we never will know for the reasons you say..8 or 10,000 a year…

“Difficult to know because the Kinsey Group is a little biased” – about 100 to one illegality

People who need abortions most Negroes, Puerto Ricans

15:00Huge disparity between … particularly in NY City,people who need abortions most, the percentage of Puerto Ricans , Negros other minority groups who secure hospital abortions very minor…. I abject to the word Illegal abortion, we do not know what illegal abortion is …