Archive for Hate Speech

Abortion rights protester uses racial slur when referring to MLK’s niece

Posted in Alveda King, Pro-choice mocking, Pro-choice People, Pro-choice racism, Racism, Racism against black pro-lifers, Stop Patriarchy with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 12, 2015 by saynsumthn

You’ve seen them before, that revolutionary self-proclaimed Communist pro-abortion group, Stop Patriarchy laying on the ground in blood soaked clothes to draw attention to women they claim died from illegal abortion.

Stop Patriarchy

The abortion rights group pretends to care for women despite the fact that they never mention the women maimed and killed from legal abortion or those whose rapes are covered-up by the abortion industry.

But, despite all of that, the group seems to have a lot of anger against Blacks who oppose abortion, because Black pro-lifers know the eugenic and racist history of child killing, to the point of even using racial slurs against them.

In January, the group was in Oakland, California calling for a Ferguson style revolution after disrupting Black pro-life leaders at a rally there. (read story here)

Clenard Childress Stop Patriarchy 2

Now, a report from Black leader, Dr. Alveda King has revealed that the radical reproductive rights hate group went after her with a racial slur.

Alveda King

According to reports, at the March for Life in Washington, D.C., members of this anarchist group cursed at Dr. Alveda King, the niece of Martin Luther King Jr., director of African-American Outreach for Priests for Life and a spokeswoman for the Silent No More Awareness Campaign, as she led a one-woman, non-violent protest against their antics.

Stop Patriarchy Alveda King2

Dr. King said that a few dozen members of Stop Patriarchy gathered in front of the Supreme Court wearing white pants splattered with fake blood and harassing marchers and trying to tear down the signs that were set up for the Silent No More gathering that was about to begin.

Stop Patriarchy Alveda King3
This gathering honors women and men who regret their involvement with abortion, and listens to their voices.

Stop Patriarchy Alveda King

As I was sitting in front of the Supreme Court that day, my 64th birthday no less,” said Dr. Alveda King, “the back and forth challenges between the pro-abortion protesters on one side and the pro-life marchers on the other side began to heat up. I began thinking of my uncle’s words, ‘We must learn to live together as brothers [and sisters] or perish as fools’ and I began to pray. As I prayed, I became grieved in my heart, and seemed to be led by the Spirit of God to walk between the two groups and then lie down in the street with sanctity of life sign and pray.”

Alveda King responds to Stop Patriarchy 4

Alveda said that as she lay there, she began to pray for the radical group as well as pro-lifers at the march.

The pro-abortion protesters were shouting for ‘reproductive rights’ not seeming to understand that they were promoting death as a solution. Somehow, I just wanted to take them in my arms and lovingly explain to them, “Don’t you understand that every human person has the same right as you and me, the right to life? And that choice that you are fighting for is the choice to kill a tiny human person? And mothers and dads and everybody suffers from such choices?” she said.

Stop Patriarchy Alveda King4

“There was no room for my voice, there was so much shouting. So, I lay down on the ground and I quietly prayed for God to help us love each other and stop the killing.”

Someone shouted, ‘Get off of our property!’ I thought about sitting up and explaining that we all had the constitutional right to be there, but I just kept on praying.”

Alveda King responds to Stop Patriarchy

Then, a young man looked down at me and shouted something like “who is that old nigger bitch on the ground?”

“When someone from our Priests for Life team told him I am the niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr, he ran away into the crowd.”

Was that young man preaching respect for women?” Dr. King asked, “No, he was sharing a message of hatred, bordering on violence.”

He didn’t stay to hear Dr. King’s testimony of abortion regret. He didn’t hear the words of former abortionist Dr. Anthony Levatino, who described in detail how he used to perform dismemberment abortions, or of former Planned Parenthood worker Catherine Adair, who told of the cold and callous attitudes of people who kill babies for a living.

As Dr. King and the Priests for Life team watched some of the protesters led away, in wrist restraints, by the police, she made a silent vow:

“I will keep praying, whether standing, sitting, kneeling or from the ground, every year that the Lord permits me to and I will continue to pray for all humanity, not just until the day that we abolish abortion in America and around the world; but until God’s love breaks through the stony hearts and His glory is revealed.”

Priests for Life national director, Father Frank Pavone said people who are shouting in the streets about women’s enslavement are cowards who hide behind slogans and signs to avoid having to tell the truth about what they’re fighting for: Slaughter of the most innocent human beings.

But pro-lifers with the courage of Martin Luther King and his niece Alveda are not afraid of the truth.

When we fight this battle, we’re not afraid to talk about what we’re fighting for,” Father Pavone said. “We don’t content ourselves with cursing at our opponents and disappearing into the crowd. We’re not afraid to name the evil and describe it to the public, because the more we talk about what abortion really is, the more hearts and minds we win for life.”

Later, Dr. Alveda King talked about her experience:

“You guys are intolerant” says arrested American activist who opposes Abortion and Homosexuality

Posted in homosexuality, Intolerance with tags , , , , , , , , , , on April 15, 2014 by saynsumthn

American activist Peter LaBarbera was arrested Monday and charged with mischief . He was at the University of Regina. (CBC)

Peter LaBarbera was arrested on the University of Regina campus Monday, for displaying pro-life and anti-homosexual materials the university described as “graphic” and against the institution’s policy.

Peter Labarare abortion 2

LaBarbera was invited to Weyburn to speak at a Saskatchewan Pro-life Association convention Saturday. He then decided to hold demonstrations at the province’s two universities. LaBarbera opposes same-sex marriage, gay adoption and abortion, but said he is just fighting for his right to free speech.

whatcottlabarbera_zpsbb0ea13d

I’m a Christian. I can’t hate people. We all struggle with sin – that just doesn’t happen to be my sin, but the idea that you can’t have an open debate on homosexuality on a college campus and that some speech code is brought in to kick people off because they have a viewpoint that most students probably haven’t heard, seems to me to be pretty undemocratic,” he said.

LaBarbera, who is with a group called Americans for Truth about Homosexuality, and Bill Whatcott were distributing what officials call “anti-gay literature” on the campus.

Before their arrival, the university issued a news release saying the pair would be monitored to ensure they did not engage in any activity that would promote hatred.

At one point, with news cameras rolling, an unidentified university official approached Whatcott, 46, and LaBarbera, 51, and asked them to leave. During that encounter, Whatcott said he had attempted to get permission to set up an information table and, since he was denied, proceeded to set up a table anyway.

“I’m not leaving,” Whatcott told the official, “You guys are intolerant and should be ashamed of yourselves for shutting down our message without even considering it.”

We have a charter right to speak; the Court of Queen’s Bench ruled in our favor and I’m not leaving,” countered Whatcott.

A short while later, several Regina police officers arrived and Whatcott and LaBarbera were handcuffed and taken off campus.

University officials defended their decision to call police.

Peter Labarare abortion

According to the Global News, the university said anyone is welcome on campus, as long as they uphold a respectful workplace policy and said graphic abortion posters Whatcott and LaBarbera displayed contravened this policy. So after two hours – and being asked to leave multiple times, the men were removed in handcuffs.

Prior to arriving in Canada, Labarbare was detained by the Government. He explains on Bryan Fischer’s Focal Point radio show:

UN to consider anti-blasphemy laws proposed by the Organization of Islamic Conference, would make criticism of Islam illegal in America

Posted in Christian, Church, Civil Rights, Constitution, free speech, Islam, Religion, United Nations with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 13, 2010 by saynsumthn

Press Release Christian Freedom International Condemns Proposed Defamation of Religions Resolution
Contact: Craig McDonald, Christian Freedom International, 800-323-2273

SAULT STE. MARIE, Mich., Oct. 13 /Christian Newswire/ — Christian Freedom International (CFI), a Michigan-based organization that assists persecuted Christians around the world, is condemning the Defamation of Religions Resolution that will be proposed at the UN General Assembly in New York City late this fall.

The resolution, which will criminalize any words or actions determined to be adverse to a particular religion, is being proposed by the Organization of Islamic Conference, an inter-governmental body comprised of 57 states with significantly Muslim populations. The resolution has taken various forms that have been proposed since 1999, but if passed this year, it will provide international legality for any national law punishing blasphemy or any other criticism of a religion.

Although “defamation of religion” is a concept that would ideally protect religious freedom on the broadest level, the resolution has appeared to focus mainly on the protection of Islam. CFI believes that if the resolution is passed, it would give repressive governments and extremist groups the liberty to punish anything deemed offensive to their particular religion, and will only advance the persecution of religious minorities, especially Christians.

Under existing “blasphemy” laws in Muslim-majority nations, many people are routinely arrested and imprisoned for the crimes of insulting or denigrating Islam. This past January, a Christian shopkeeper in Pakistan was sentenced to life in prison and fined $1,000 for allegedly desecrating the Quran, and a college professor in India had his hand severed as a result of insulting the prophet Mohammed on an exam questionnaire last May.

CFI, a ministry that works actively on behalf of persecuted Christians in repressive countries like Burma, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and Indonesia, urges all citizens to contact members of Congress and encourage them to vote against the Defamation of Religions Resolution at the UN General Assembly this year.

To learn more information about CFI’s work and persecution around the world, visit http://www.christianfreedom.org.

CBN is reporting that, The Organization of Islamic Conference claims the threatened Koran burning and the protests over a proposed mosque near Ground Zero make it imperative to protect against growing Islamaphobia.

The resolution is supposed to protect all religions. But Jay Sekulow, with the American Center for Law and Justice told CBN News that it’s real purpose is to protect Islam, that it could be used to persecute people of other faiths.

“The fact of the matter is that this definition of religion has nothing to do with protecting religious freedom, in fact to the contrary,” Sekulow said.

“What it does is isolate and protect Islam from criticism, which means those that are engaged in the (propagation) of gospel to members of Muslim faith would be guilty of violating a UN resolution,” he explained.

“I mean who’s in favor of defaming religion? Nobody is the answer,” he added. “But that’s not what the resolution deals with. The resolution says if you speak out against Islam you’re guilty of violating a UN resolution.”

Newspaper editorials in Muslim nations around the world are also calling for the resolution’s passage.

Last Year Lou Dobbs reported this:

I found this on YouTube….from the PEN American Center

1:23 a representative of the United States speaks:

From the PEN American Center, United Nations Side-session Panel Discussion with Dr. Agnes Callamard, director, ARTICLE 19 (UK), Professor Tariq Ramadan (Switzerland), Mr. Budhy M. Rahman, program officer, The Asia Foundation (Indonesia); Moderated by Mr. John Ralston Saul, writer, president of International PEN (Canada).

International PEN and its national centers are extremely concerned about ongoing processes in the United Nations aimed at combating defamation of religions. We are also concerned about an initiative by the UN Ad Hoc Committee on Complementary Standards, established in 2007 by the Islamic Conference (OIC) and a group of African countries, to draft a treaty that would ban religious defamation. Human Rights protect individual human beings, not institutions or religions. Criticism of religions and religious practices must be allowed, in particular when religions are viewed from a political point of view. As organizations representing writers, artists, and journalists of all faiths and none, we warn against any regulations prohibiting criticism of any religion or any set of ideas.

Against this background we have asked a group of high profile scholars, writers, and human rights defenders to join us for a side event in Geneva on the afternoon of September 16 in Room XXI of the UN Building.

Did NAACP’s Hilary Shelton describe Planned Parenthood and their targeting of blacks and unborn children in his definition of racism and hate speech?

Posted in Abortion, Black Babies, Black Genocide, Black Victims, Hate Crimes, Maafa21, Margaret Sanger, NAACP, Personhood, Planned Parenthood, pro-choice, Pro-Life, Quotes, Racism, Tea Party with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 10, 2010 by saynsumthn

In the 9-9-2010 segment on the O’Reilly factor, Bill and NAACP’s Hilary Shelton discuss the NAACP’s “tea Party tracker” and later in the interview Mr. Shelton gives a great definition racism and hate speech. Shelton and the NAACP do not apply this standard across the board, because if they did , they would describe Planned Parenthood as racist because they view unborn babies as “unfit” and “Less than human” and their founder was a noted Klan speaker.

Here is how NAACP Hilary Shelton defines racism, ( When asked why Rev. Jeremiah Wright, having been invited to speak to the NAACP, would not be using hate speech), Shelton described Racism as the following:
““If he said that in deed that somebody was less than normal someone was inferior that someone else was superior that somehow or another someone was less than human that would be hate speech. If they said about you because of your race or your gender that something about you was less than human that would be hate speech !”

Begin at 3:50

Shelton tells Bill to look u the definition of Racism, “Rac[ism] requires power plus prejudice”, and then lists the examples of Tuskegee experiments, when the NAACP supports Planned Parenthood and their eugenics history?

Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger, was a member in good standing with the racist American Eugenics Society. Sanger had board members who were known for their racist writings and Sanger published many of those in her publications. She also associated with people who praised the German Nazi Party leader- Adolf Hitler. Sanger called for parents to have a QUOTE: LICENSE TO BREED controlled by people who believed in her eugenic philosophy. She wanted all would be parents to go before her eugenic boards to request a “PERMIT TO BREED“.

Margaret Sanger said, “More children from the fit, less from the unfit — that is the chief aim of birth control.” Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12 ( ***OPPS there is that RACIST and Hateful Code Word !)

In Margaret Sanger’s, “Birth Control and Racial Betterment,” Feb 1919. Birth Control Review , Library of Congress Microfilm 131:0099B .

Sanger states, “Before eugenists and others who are laboring for racial betterment can succeed, they must first clear the way for Birth Control. Like the advocates of Birth Control, the eugenists, for instance, are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit. Both are seeking a single end but they lay emphasis upon different methods.

Eugenists emphasize the mating of healthy couples for the conscious purpose of producing healthy children, the sterilization of the unfit to prevent their populating the world with their kind and they may, perhaps, agree with us that contraception is a necessary measure among the masses of the workers, where wages do not keep pace with the growth of the family and its necessities in the way of food, clothing, housing, medical attention, education and the like.

We who advocate Birth Control, on the other hand, lay all our emphasis upon stopping not only the reproduction of the unfit but upon stopping all reproduction when there is not economic means of providing proper care for those who are born in health.While I personally believe in the sterilization of the feeble-minded, the insane and syphilitic, I have not been able to discover that these measures are more than superficial deterrents when applied to the constantly growing stream of the unfitEugenics without Birth Control seems to us a house builded upon the sands. It is at the mercy of the rising stream of the unfit…

Sanger also called for those who were poor and what she considered to be “morons and immoral‘ , to be shipped to colonies where they would live in “Farms and Open Spaces” dedicated to brainwashing these so-called “inferior types” into having what Sanger called, “Better moral conduct”.

I consider that the world and almost our civilization for the next twenty-five years, is going to depend upon a simple, cheap, safe contraceptive to be used in poverty stricken slums, jungles, and among the most ignorant people. Even this will not be sufficient, because I believe that now, immediately, there should be national sterilization for certain dysgenic types of our population who are being encouraged to breed and would die out were the government not feeding them.
Planned Parenthood Founder, Margaret Sanger, 1950

In addition, Planned Parenthood’s top award is called the Margaret Sanger Award, despite the fact that Sanger was an admitted Klan speaker. This is what Sanger wrote in her autobiography, “I accepted an invitation to talk to the women’s branch of the Ku Klux Klan…I saw through the door dim figures parading with banners and illuminated crosses…I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak…In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered.” (Margaret Sanger: An Autobiography, P.366)

Who are the UNFIT which Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger was talking about? Does the NAACP and Hilary Shelton care to know? Find out in the powerful documentary Maafa21 in exposing the 21st Century Black Genocide (Clip below)

Less than Human

Let’s not forget that Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry in general consider unborn human babies- Less than Human. They are considered as having less rights than their mothers.


Jesse Jackson once phrased the issue this way, “In the abortion debate one of the crucial questions is when does life begin. Anything growing is living. Therefore human life begins when the sperm and egg join and drop into the fallopian tube and the pulsation of life take place. From that point, life may be described differently (as an egg, embryo, fetus, baby, child, teenager, adult), but the essence is the same. The name has changed but the game remains the same…Another area that concerns me greatly, namely because I know how it has been used with regard to race, is the psycholinguistics involved in this whole issue of abortion. If something can be dehumanized through the rhetoric used to describe it, then the major battle has been won. So when American soldiers can drop bombs on Vietnam and melt the faces and hands of children into a hunk of rolling protoplasm and in their minds say they have not maimed or killed a fellow human being something terribly wrong and sick has gone on in that mind. That is why the Constitution called us three-fifths human and then whites further dehumanized us by calling us “niggers.” It was part of the dehumanizing process. The first step was to distort the image of us as human beings in. order to justify that which they wanted to do and not even feel like they had done anything wrong. Those advocates of taking. life prior to birth do not call it killing or murder; they call it abortion. They further never talk about aborting a baby because that would imply something human. Rather they talk about aborting the fetus. Fetus sounds less than human and therefore can be justified.

FCC Petition: ReEducation for “Conservative Talk Radio”

Posted in Czar, Fairness Doctrine, free speech, Glenn Beck, Obama with tags , , , , , , , , , on December 10, 2009 by saynsumthn

This is from National Religious Broadcasters

http://www.nrb.org

Last Friday I attended a meeting in Washington co-sponsored by the Federal Communications Bar Association. The subject was a petition that had been filed with the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) back in January, just as the new Obama Administration was taking over the reins of power. The petition is asking the FCC to launch a formal investigation into “hate” over the airwaves. The targets in the petition are conspicuous radio conservatives, but it is clear that Christian broadcasters would all be in the cross hairs if the FCC were to take this petition seriously. The petitioners are a coalition spearheaded by the National Hispanic Media Coalition (NHMC), and also includes the United Church of Christ. One of the speakers at last Friday’s meeting was Jessica Gonzalez, an attorney for the petitioners. When asked by the attendees about the end-game of their petition to the FCC, Ms. Gonzalez declined to say that they want to see new anti-hate regulations t o control broadcast content. Yet the petition itself would certainly lend itself to that result, citing as it did the FCC’s supposed “public interest” power to eradicate slanted and unfair broadcast characterizations of people or groups. Instead, Ms. Gonzalez cited the need for a national dialogue on what her group perceives as the problem with some conservative commentary, particularly as it deals with the immigration issue.

Aside from the obvious point that the FCC has no business firing-up investigations merely to create a useful public dialogue on an issue, and the even more obvious First Amendment objections to this hate speech petition, what is most revealing is the specific remedy the petitioners’ attorney says they really want: namely, that the federal government should launch a public “education” and “awareness” campaign focusing on the problem with some of the rhetoric contained in conservative broadcasts. I can just envision public school curricula being devised on this subject as an example. Or PSA’s required to be carried on every radio or TV station identifying those opinion-makers who are deemed to be purveyors of “hate”; a whole generation being schooled that certain opinions should be shuffled outside the city gates and treated with universal condemnation. When I wrote recently that this kind of public indoctrination could well be one of the most dangerous consequences of recently passed “hate crimes” legislation, the gay-rights blogs considered me an extremist. But in our constitutional Republic, when the federal government is being asked to create an official orthodoxy of opinion on matters of politics, religion, and social morality in the form of “hate” inquisitions, and then to enforce it upon the citizenry through massive public “education,” who, I might ask, are the real extremists?

READ: Obama’s Diversity Offensive Against Talk Radio

Congressman Jeff Fortenberry on Eugenics , Genocide, and Justice Ginsburg

Posted in Abortion, Black Genocide, Constitution, Eugenics, Evolution, Racism, Religion, Sterilization with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on July 17, 2009 by saynsumthn

The best way to hate a nigger is to hate him before he is born“, this is a quote by those who agree with the recent comment by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. It is time to be educated and see the truth: Maafa21 will expose this racist agenda once and for all.

Congressman Jeff Fortenberry on Eugenics and Margaret Sanger

Now Listen to the racist quotes just released on a new film, Maafa21, that explains just the “populations” that Ginsburg and her eugenic friends do not want too many of:

Truth about Black Genocide and Abortion

Posted in Abortion, Black Genocide, Evolution, Religion, Violence against women with tags , , , , , , , , , on June 18, 2009 by saynsumthn

Please spread the word about this new documentary about abortion and black genocide: Maafa21

Below are some YouTube clips and a link to where it can be ordered.

They were stolen from their homes, locked in chains and taken across an ocean. And for more than 200 years, their blood and sweat would help to build the richest and most powerful nation the world has ever known.

But when slavery ended, their welcome was over. America’s wealthy elite had decided it was time for them to disappear and they were not particular about how it might be done.

What you are about to see is that the plan these people set in motion 150 years ago is still being carried out today. So don’t think that this is history. It is not. It is happening right here, and it’s happening right now.

Maafa 21 Clip # 1

Maafa 21 Clip # 2

Maafa 21 Clip # 3

Here is where you can order it: Maafa21

http://www.maafa21.com/

A MUST SEE FOR EVERYONE, especially African AmericansMaafa 21 Black Genocide and abortion DVD
Continue reading