Archive for CBR

Disemboweling unborn babies in abortion described by fetal procurement company exposed in new Planned Parenthood

Posted in Aborted Baby Body Parts, Planned Parenthood sells aborted baby parts with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on September 2, 2015 by saynsumthn

The ninth video in the Planned Parenthood baby parts scandal focuses on Advanced Bioscience Resources, Inc. (ABR), described by CBR as, “the small and secretive company that has harvested and sold fetal body parts at Planned Parenthood clinics longer than any other entity.”

CMP Larton ABR fetus intact

During a long conversation CBR had with Perrin Larton, the Procurement Manager for ABR at what appears to be a trade show with the acronym ISSCR, Larton describes details about the abortion procedure.

Larton is listed in a 2011 ISSCR program flyer:
ABR Perrin Larton ICCR abortion CBR


In the video, the CBR representative Tells Larton that he is interested in whole specimens for mice research, “I would like to lean more on the side of whole organ transplants for the mice…” he says.

To which she responds, “The problem with that is they don’t come out intact. There’s not closed abdomen. It’s always torn apart,” she says.

CMP Larton ABR fetus intact

“The whole point is not to have a live birth…” the ABR rep adds.

Disemboweling :


Later in the conversation Larton explains how the unborn child is disembowled, The abdomen is always ripped open…Everything will just get ripped up,” she says of the child’s organs.

Explaining, ““Whenever we have a smooth portion of liver, we think that’s good…”

Adding, “Just the instruments they go in to pull…it’s just whatever presents first unfortunately and I don’t know why, a lot of times the abdomen presents first and they just go in and start pulling…They’re just there to end a pregnancy. And we cannot ask them to change a process.”

However, the ABR procurement expert does explain that the babies can be delivered “intact” after an abortion:

    “I literally have had women come in and they’ll go in the O.R. and they’re back out in 3 minutes, and I’m going, ‘What’s going on?’ Oh yeah, the fetus was already in the vaginal canal whenever we put her in the stirrups, it just fell out,” she explains of situations where there has been a great enough degree of cervical dilation to procure an intact fetus.

According to the Federal Procurement Data System website, Advanced Bioscience Resources received a $9900 contract with the Food and Drug Administration for in vitro diagnostic substances.

ABR Perrin Lartin CBR Linda abortion fetal tissue

According to CBR, Advanced Bioscience Resources was founded in 1989 by CEO Linda Tracy and charges $340 per second-trimester fetal tissue specimen.

A quick look at ABR’s 2013 990 Tracey, Larton and ABR’s associates earn a good salary from “procuring” fetuses.

Advanced Bio Science 2013 990 Linda Tracy Perrin Larton CBR abortion fetal

In 2013, public records show the organization had net income of just over a million dollars.

Tracey told NPR that ABR procures fetal tissue from hospitals and clinics that perform abortions, paying $30 to $100 a specimen. And adding that her researchers typically pay between $340 and $550 for the fetal organs.

In another portion of the video CMP speaks to Dr. Katharine Sheehan, the long-time medical director of Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest until 2013 that her abortion clinic has been using ABR for a number of years.

Katharine Sheehan Planned Parenthood CNR

Sheehan tells actors posing as a new human biologics company that at Planned Parenthood Pacific Southwest, “We have already a relationship with ABR.” Sheehan explains, “We’ve been using them for over 10 years, really a long time, just kind of renegotiated the contract. They’re doing the big collections for government-level collections and things like that.”

When one of the actors negotiates, “We return a portion of our fees to the clinics.”

Sheehan responds eagerly, “Right, get a toe in and make it, make a pro–alright.”

More here.

Provocative display links shootings of Blacks by police with abortion victims

Posted in Black Conservative, Black Genocide, Black Lives Matter, Black Pastor, CBR, Clenard Childress, Fetal Development, Fetal Pain, Police Abuse with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on February 18, 2015 by saynsumthn

A National pro-life group is teaming up with African American leaders to introduced a provocative new pro-life sign display entitled, “All Black Lives Matter.”

All Lives Matter

The signs, created by The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform (CBR), display images of abortion victims with various messages directed to the African American community and ask, where is the African-American community’s outrage over the hundreds of thousands of preborn black children butchered this year by the brutality of abortion?! Why isn’t the civil rights slogan “Don’t shoot” accompanied by the exhortation “Don’t abort”?

According to the group’s press release, the exhibit was inspired by the tragic series of encounters between black suspects and white police officers in which the suspects lost their lives while being taken into custody.

CBR said that they believes the rule of law requires that police officers who employ excessive force should be prosecuted, convicted and punished appropriately, “A young black man who raises his hands, shouting “Don’t shoot!” has a right to be apprehended unharmed,” they said.

CBR Dont Shoot Dont Abort

CBR also stated that a young black man restrained in a police choke-hold should never die of asphyxiation after declaring, “I can’t breathe.”

“The evidence is often in dispute, but where proven beyond a reasonable doubt, police brutality is an intolerable outrage — especially if racially motivated. But where is the African-American community’s outrage over the hundreds of thousands of preborn black children butchered this year by the brutality of abortion?! Why isn’t the civil rights slogan “Don’t shoot” accompanied by the exhortation “Don’t abort”? When will African-American religious and political leaders acknowledge that aborted babies can’t breathe either? A police choke-hold can be a form of torture, and abortion also tortures babies to death. As Lila Rose recently established in another of her brilliant Live Action videos, the abortion industry lies to mothers about fetal pain,” their release says.

CBR icant breathe abortionn prolife Al Lives Matter

More from the Press Release:

    The British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology reports in a review titled, “Fetal Pain: Implications for Research and Practice” (September 1999), that “… It is possible that the fetus can feel pain from 20 weeks and is caused distress from interventions as early as 15 or 16 weeks” (p 885). Brain structures activated by 16 weeks “… could be associated with unpleasant conscious experience” (p 885). Between 13 and 16 weeks is when “… it is likely that the fetus is aware of anything that is going on in its body …” (p 882). At eight weeks, “The fetus starts to make movements in response to being touched …” (p 882). More than 100,000 babies each year are aborted after 13 weeks (about 10% of the 1.1 million annual total). Approximately 17,000 are killed after 21 weeks (about 1.4% of the total).

    A large percentage of these babies are African-American and many are dying slow, agonizing deaths. Those who aren’t torn to pieces suffer excruciating heart attacks after being injected with lethal doses of digoxin or potassium chloride, the same poisons being used to stop the hearts of death row inmates (See, “Shots Assist in Aborting Fetuses,” August 10, 2007.)

    The Orange County Register, January 24, 2015, published a story headlined “Justices to Review Drug for Execution,” which reported that the U.S. Supreme Court is examining the possibility that these drugs are causing inmates “intense” pain. The Los Angeles Times, on the same day, notes that an African-American inmate named Charles Warner recently exclaimed, “My body is on fire,” after receiving this lethal injection.

    The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is rightly dismayed to report (NAACP LDF Report “Death Row U.S.A.,” Summer 2013) that black inmates comprise 42% of death row prisoners. Why, then, do they strongly support the slaughter of the far greater numbers of African-American preborn children being executed with the same lethal injections?

    NAACP leader Julian Bond recently equated abortion rights with racially-related civil rights (“NAACP Leader: Right to Abort is Same as Right to Eat at Lunch Counter,”, August 6, 2014). The NAACP is so intellectually dishonest concerning black genocide that its board refuses to permit any debate on any proposed resolution related to abortion and won’t even allow the public reading of such proposals.


CBR said they are teaming up with the Rev. Clenard Childress a black minister who is a member of their board and will be holding a press conference in Washington D.C to unveil the new display. Rev. Childress is founder of BlackGenocide.Org. Several other African-American pastors and pro-life activists will also present brief remarks.


As these abortion photos prove incontestably, abortion is an act of violence which kills a baby, and abortion is teaching an entire generation of young African-Americans to solve its problems by resorting to violence,” they said.


In addition, the group points out that the targeting of the African American community by Planned Parenthood’s “abortion care” has suppressed the black vote more effectively than poll taxes, literacy tests, voter I.D. requirements and Ku Klux Klan lynchings combined.

Abortion suppresses the Black Vote.”

CBR Abortion Surpresses Black Vote

These new signs are intended to stop this fratricidal atrocity,” says CBR, “CBR will collaborate with African-American anti-abortion leaders across the country to display them at middle schools, high schools, universities and churches with substantial black enrollment. Our African-American president has betrayed us. It is long past time for us to take matters into our own hands with an unavoidable witness against this great evil,” they said.

Read more here.

How Abolish Human Abortion uses the very Pro-life Movement They Condemn

Posted in AHA with tags , , , , , , , , , , on January 17, 2014 by saynsumthn

CLARIFICATION: The title of this blog post is How Abolish Human Abortion uses the very Pro-life Movement They Condemn. This blog post is NOT saying that AHA failed to get permission for materials or images they produce. When I point to a copyright, it is to document that the image does, in fact, belong to a pro-life group. If, I state that AHA shows no copyright on their reproduction to a pro-life org. that is also a statement of fact and nothing else. I am simply reinforcing that AHA uses the very movement they seek to condemn.

The group, Abolish Human Abortion (A/H/A) says they want to PUT AN END TO THE PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT which their members promote with their hashtag #PAETTPLM

AHA Kepp Calm - PAETTPLM_595

Below are images of the hashtag in use:

aha is wrong

CHicago AHA OR


AHA members believe that the Pro-life Movement is the “Lesser of Two Evils.” In other words there are baby killers and there are pro-lifers and the pro-lifers are the lesser of the evils. SAD! AHA members say they believe that the Pro-life Movement is the enemy of God and is not saving babies. (listen here) AHA Spokesperson, Todd Bullis, says that the pro-life movement can say we are saving some babies but,”They killed 1.2 million babies.” He says that their stance is evil. AHA lumps pro-lifers into one category although many AHA leaders and members have only recently personally activated to stand up for unborn children slaughtered by abortion – abandoning, in a sense the unborn for years, they feel it is now their “duty” to call Pro-lifers to “Repentance” for “incremental legislation” and in the end to do everything they can to “PUT AN END TO THE PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT.”

AHA Lesser of two evils

The reason for this blog is NOT to attack Abolish Human Abortion, although some within A/H/A may interpret it that way. As a long-standing pro-life activist, I welcome anyone who speaks for unborn children.

The purpose of this blog is educational. I am simply showing you how Abolish Human Abortion uses pro-life imagery to promote their ideology and the agenda of “PUTTING AN END TO THE PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT.”


AHA is well-known for their posters which are regularly shared on social media. Using that approach gives AHA plenty of FB “likes” where they can then begin to promote their ultimate goal which is to “PUT AN END TO THE PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT.”

But – where does some of the imagery come from which AHA uses on their posters? You guessed it, from the ever so wicked PLM.

Case in point- the PRO-LIFE group Life Issues Institute which was founded in 1991 by J C Willke, MD, one of the most well known “Pro-life” advocates in the movement, has produced some beautiful images of unborn children, called Windows to the Womb.

This image with a clear COPYRITE to Life Issues Institute is duplicated on an AHA poster giving no copyrite credit to the pro-life organization.

Dont Be Fooled no Copywrite AHAOn the LH is the Life Issues Image from their website and on the RH is AHA’s use of this pro-life image.

But this is not the only time:

Aha uses Life Issues ImageOn the LH – Life Issues Copyrite Image. On the RH – AHA Poster

This poster uses artwork that was developed to pass “incremental partial birth abortion ban”

The artwork was developed by Tanja Butler but is being used by AHA below:


Pro-life Journalist Image used by AHA

The picture below was taken by pro-life photo journalist Michael Clancy on August 19, 1999, at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville Tn., during an incredible procedure to correct spina bifida on an unborn child. Julie Armas was twenty one weeks pregnant with little Samuel at the time of the procedure. You will notice that there is no reference to the Pro-life Journalist or credit given by Abolish Human Abortion in their poster.

AHA Michael Clancy Image abortion On the LH is an AHA Poster using the pro-life image. On the RH is the image fmrm Michael Clancy showing his copyrite.


Abortion Victim Images found by Pro-lifers used by A/H/A

What is also of interest – is that I have yet to hear of any Abolitionist actually getting an aborted baby from an abortion clinic trash dumpster or any other means. Given that, it is very plausible that every image they use on their posters of aborted children may have come from some brave Pro-life man or woman in the very Pro-life movement they want to “Destroy.”

Case in point- the image on the Left came from Life Dynamics’ website – the poster on the right from AHA.
AHA uses that very image even though Life Dynamics is a National Pro-Life organization.
AHA Life Dynamics Aborted baby picOn the LH is the Life Dynamics image. On the RH is the AHA Poster using that image.


I found this image (below) on the AHA Facebook page and it appears to shows an image of an abortion victim on their poster which looks like it came from the Pro-life Group – Center for Bio-ethical Reform (CBR) (see here)

AHA Cover uses CBR abortion image

And this image below is also a Center for Bioethical Reform Image – used by Pro-life Groups who give credit to CBR.

AHA Card does not credit the Pro-lifer group, why?

CBR Life Dynamics AHA Graphic abortion


CBR Header


This AHA Poster also uses an image from the pro-life organization CBR :

AHA CBR IMAGE_630426217023396_1841801464_n

This AHA image comes from a Citizens for a Pro-life Society taken by Pro-lifer Monica Miller who found the children. See the image on her website here.


Citizens for Prolife Society


This image also comes from Monica Miller’s Citizen for a Pro-life Society: (see here)



This image also comes from pro-lifer Monica Miller’s Citizen for a Pro-life Society but holds the AHA Logo on the poster:


See the aborted baby pics on Miller’s website here


Also this poster uses a CBR image ( See it at CBR here)


And the poster below uses CBR’s Image from here:



Here is another pro-life CBR Image on this poster:

MOney AHA CBR Image31951686870849_774301376_n


And this AHA poster uses CBR’s 10 week aborted baby pic (see on CBR website here)

AHA uses CBR 10 week pic76139515_n

This AHA Poster also uses a CBR Image (Found Here)

RibsKeep Abortion Safe Legal and Rare


Abolish Human Abortion Profits from Pro-Life Work

Here we find Abolish Human Abortion actually profiting off the work of Pro-life groups by using images they produced to sell in their AHAGEAR:

AHA uses CBR image to make moneyThis image appears to use the CBR image referenced above only with gloved fingers.


This image was originally published by the pro-life group Operation Rescue after they were in contact with former abortion workers of abortionist Douglas Karpen.

AhA Karpen abortion pis from Operation Rescue

Operation Rescue leader, Troy Newman and AHA leader T. Russell Hunter have debated on numerous occasions which is why the use of their image is so interesting. None-the-less, despite the accusations from Abolish Human Abortion that pro-life groups “fundraise” AHA has no difficulty asking for money using pro-life work.

But wait – you can buy that image here as well:

AHA uses Operation Rescue Karpen Image 2

It has also been turned into an AHA Sign:



From FB

AHA GEAR   201410257149_673857299346954_4105049554622516497_n


Abolish Human Abortion claims they are about opposing regulations and abortion exceptions. Yet they have posters that ask for their members to investigate abortionists in their city, the same tactics used by pro-lifers to close abortion clinics and put abortionists out of business.




A/H/A has done a good job of self-promotion. However, they also will use the Pro-life media to spread their message. The reason, as I see it, is that they have no developed outlets other than social media outlets to do this. So, despite their distaste for all things pro-life they will contact them with stories. Pro-life Bloggers, such as Jill Stanek, who have been contacted by AHA have initially been generous to AHA members.

Here Stanek promotes AHA Drop Cards.

Here Stanek asks if regulating abortion clinics is okay – and the response by AHA was to get their members to vote NO in her poll.

And Here Stanek compliments an AHA Poster.

Here Stanek praises Abolish Human Abortion leader Todd Bullis.

See here

Saynsumthn has also posted stories about AHA. Recently I was one of a few pro-life blogs to post about a few incidents of violence toward their members.

My most recent story is here and when another pro-life news outlet heard about it, AHA member Toby Harmon, who was assaulted by a pro-choicer, was invited on his show. That was AFR’s Bryan Fischer, and even though he is avidly pro-life AHA had no trouble promoting the interview to get the word out about their assault.


Then AFA’s One News Now picked up the story and made the mistake of referring to AHA as “Pro-Life” in this title: Pro-lifers in Oklahoma record assault, claim no help coming from police

AHA responded on their facebook page with these words,“Dear Christian Media and News Outlets, This may seem like a minor detail to those of you covering the recent mishandling of justice in Norman Oklahoma, but there is a great difference between pro-lifers and abolitionists, and the men who were attacked outside of this killing center in Norman, Ok, are not pro-lifers. They are abolitionists.

We understand that you are unaware of these difference, or that you are just trying to use the terms that will be most familiar to your readers, but the fact of the matter is this: leaders of the pro-life movement are at odds with abolitionists over clearly defined ideological differences (pro-lifers are pluralists, pragmatists, and regulationists, while abolitionists are bible believing evangelicals who trust providence and work on abolishing abortion because it is murder, not incrementally banning it because it isn’t safe, etc) and they actually appreciate your referring to abolitionists as pro-lifers because it keeps those differences from being discussed and debated in the wider public sphere. They foster this because they know that many of their followers and financial supporters, are much closer to the abolitionists in ideology and practice, than they are to leading pro-life figures and organizations.

For example, Abby Johnson (who opposes the preaching of the Gospel outside abortion “clinics”) has actually stated publicly that Toby Harmon deserved to be physically assaulted for doing what he did. This pro life leader and former abortion worker believes that all you should do outside the abortion clinic is gather quietly and pray, and that the people who work in abortion clinics are not evil, just in the wrong line of work (her ministry is focused on finding them new jobs, not calling them to repent).

Another interesting aspect of the division between pro-life leaders and abolitionists is the fact that pro-life organization and media sources have actually chosen not to cover any of the exploits of abolitionists. When they have, such as when LifeSiteNews covered this incident, they have been reprimanded and pressured by pro life leaders to take their stories down and not give any press to the abolitionist cause. Other leaders like Jill Stanek who are very aware of what is going on within the burgeoning abolitionist community have chosen not to cover this incident because they have their typing fingers on the pulse of pro-life movement and not the abolitionist movement.

This is because she knows and recognizes there is a great difference between pro-lifers and abolitionists and she wants to make sure that difference remains as muddled as possible. This is all good and certainly their prerogative, but the point of this long status is important to put out there.

Abolitionists are not pro lifers. We do not refer to ourselves or our work using that label. We associate the label “pro life” with things like voting for John McCain and Mitt Romney, supporting laws which protect the right to murder babies so long as they don’t feel any pain, regulating and temporarily shutting down abortion clinics because they are not safe enough or clean enough, going on big walks with other people who think these things out to be the focus, focusing more on saving the babies and leaving the culture the way it is rather than changing the culture in order to save the babies, leaving the Gospel out of the public debate about abortion, etc.

Sorry to be nit-picky with your news reporting (we do appreciate it), but words and labels have meanings and you are making false connections that serve to keep the country lukewarm about abortion as though there really ought to be a pro-choose-life movement and pro-choose-death movement endlessly battling over increments in America.

We are abolitionists. We are not interested in preserving the way things have been going on in the abortion and prolife industries over the past 41 years.

A//∀ “

Following that major correction about the difference between pro-life and abolition, A/H/A members Tobey Harmo and Jeremy Brown appeared on the media Blog Talk Radio show, Pro-life Fridays.


Here AHA promotes the show:

Prolife fridays


In conclusion, this post is not about opposing Abolish Human Abortion generally. It is also not about whether they asked for permission to published imagery that belonged to people in the pro-life movement or not. What this blog is intended to do is to call AHA to the same Biblical Standards they claim to live by. AHA must realize that they are using the work of those they seek to destroy. They are profiting off years of pro-life work as well. This is not about using pro-life materials as they are offered, this is about labeling what has been produced by the PLM as AHA (i.e. the poster examples above.) If AHA wants to be as purist as they claim, perhaps they need to do the difficult work of locating aborted children and photographing babies that they dig out of trash dumpsters, perhaps they need to develop their own media outlets rather than trying to get attention by the well established Pro-life media and in the event that AHA ever risks anything the way pro-life people have in the way of arrests, I would certainly hope that Abolish Human Abortion would not use the same pro-life attorneys paid for by the very fundraising efforts they despise.

I invite you to leave your comments. I welcome corrections, please post them below. I have tried to be as accurate as I could.

Pro-choicers yell at BLACKS during MLK March for exposing abortion as racist and “Dreaming” that the babies should be protected in the womb

Posted in Black Conservative, Black Genocide with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on August 30, 2013 by saynsumthn

On Saturday, August 24th, volunteers from CBR Maryland and Life Education and Resource Network (LEARN), a pro-life organization that ministers primarily to the black community, spent nearly seven hours speaking out against the black genocide of abortion. Their target was the 50th Anniversary of the March on Washington for Jobs and Justice in Washington, DC.

Childress Holding SIgn

The original March on Washington, which took place August 28th, 1963, was the scene of Martin Luther King, Jr’s famous “I have a dream” speech, and was instrumental in righting the long standing injustice of segregation then so prevalent in American society.

The groups posted a Press Release which explained why they were protesting, “today, the spirit and legacy of this pivotal event are exploited to promote pro-abortion policies and politicians. The rally prior to Saturday’s march was orchestrated by the pro-choice National Action Network, led by Al Sharpton. Among those addressing the audience was former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Attorney General Eric Holder, whose wife owns an abortion clinic and who has persecuted pro-life activists. Every “civil rights issue” imaginable was highlighted and championed except the right of Unborn children to live. As usual, the most victimized group in America was disenfranchised and denied even the status of ‘victim’.

To counteract this, anti-abortionists carried out a Black Genocide Awareness Project along the route of the march and on the National Mall. Large CBR Maryland banners decrying black genocide and comparing abortion to lynching attracted the attention of the crowds. The distribution of nearly 5,000 pieces of literature and hundreds of copies of the film Maafa21: Black Genocide in 21st Century America gave those who wanted to learn more a chance to do so, while amplified street preaching ensured that even those who did not want to learn left more knowledgeable than when they came. Conversations between pro-life volunteers and marchers ensued all day long.”

As they held a number of signs showing the clear connection from the Jewish Holocaust, the days of American slavery, and the slaughter of human persons in the womb, a mean and angry crowd gathered around to chant hate at them:

A spokesman from the pro-life Black group. LEARN responded, ” Altogether, the Black Genocide Awareness Project was a fantastic event,” said Pastor Bobby Fulmore, a LEARN member from North Carolina, “We got this message out to at least 50 percent of the people who came through here today. When they saw these signs, when they saw the message, they were touched in their hearts. We got a chance to preach the Gospel, we got a chance to pass out about 1,000 DVDs of Maafa21 . . . and most of them saw it and they understood what was happening . . . today we prevailed against the gates of hell and we just want to give God the glory!”

According to the group’s press release, “Only a few people opposed the pro-life message with any sort of disrespect. A small contingent of pro-abortion supporters (mostly Caucasian) chanted slogans as they passed beneath the shadow of our 12 foot and 8 foot long banners, which graphically depict the very practice they were so vocally defending. Needless to say, the contrast was startling.”


The black protesters made references to the documentary film: Maafa21 which shows a CLEAR connection of Racism, Eugenics to the nation’s tops abortion provider Planned Parenthood.

Leaders of the group LEARN, Rev. Johnny Hunter and Rev. Clenard Childress, who runs the website were present at the event. Also present were members of the Maryland Center for Bioethical Reform, an anti-abortion organization.

Johnny and Clenard2

We have a Dream2

Johnny and Clenard3


The group concluded, “African Americans, who constituted the majority of attendees at the March on Washington, are perhaps the most key demographic in the pro-life battle, seeing as 37 percent of children aborted in America are black and yet most blacks are nominally opposed to abortion. A large percentage of black America would likely support pro-life legislation if they realized what was truly at stake. Anti-abortion advocates should invest much more time in spreading their message among African Americans, truly the most receptive population segment in the nation.

A day will come when people look back at our era and wonder how we could wave the banner of “civil rights” so brazenly while tolerating, and even celebrating, the vicious killing of our offspring. Then, we will all wish we had been one of the few that stood for justice when justice had lost its meaning. ”

MLK ‘March for Jobs’ ignores Black Genocide from abortion

Posted in Black Eugenics Victim, Black Genocide, MLK with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on August 26, 2013 by saynsumthn

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

MLK March 1147593_617588721624798_1700102717_oTens of thousands of people flooded the Lincoln Memorial and the National Mall on Saturday, the first stop in a week of events commemorating the 50th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s watershed “I Have A Dream” address and the March on Washington.

A chorus of speakers rallied the massive crowd with prayers for peace and calls for justice that were at once testaments to King’s historical legacy and nods to contemporary issues, from hotly debated policing tactics to voting rights.

Sharpton called on activists to march for jobs and economic opportunity, criticizing the federal government for “bailing out the banks” and corporations while many African-Americans grapple with poverty.

He later turned his attention to gun violence, saying, “We gotta fight against this recklessness that makes us so insensitive that we shoot each other for no reason.”

MLLK Marchbilde


Off to the side, was another group of people, reminding the crowds that injustice had not ended. These people were shouting that abortion is RACIST and has been used as Black Genocide against the black race.

1149Terrince Jessie035_10200621661529566_1139837468_n (Photo Credit- Terrince Jessie)

They also advocated for the lives of the unborn killed from abortion: An entire class of humans are being targeted for death and the MLK March leaders refused to address the issue at all. That is why these people gathered, they wanted to get their message out to March goers.

543897_10200621656409438_340795035_n(Photo Credit- Terrince Jessie)

Jonathan Darnel CBR

Years ago – the niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, Alveda King spoke out about her convictions on abortion:

Alveda King worries that tying specific social causes to her uncle diminishes his overarching significance. She said he was “an imperfect human who served a perfect God” and wants the celebrations to focus on a unifying message of love.

“There are so many definitions of, ‘What does civil rights mean?’ … It’s a natural thing that people would say, ‘Surely this is what Martin Luther King was marching for,’” said Alveda King, who has her own ministry and is active in a group called Priests for Life. “Fifty years have showed us that fighting for causes will not unite us.”

DrAlvedaKingMLK’s niece remembers her uncle’s dream: “It doesn’t matter to me what their skin color is. We’ve not arrived when so many of our children are dying either by gun fire, beating each other up, #abortion. We’re not there while our young people are dying. We’re just not there.” Alveda King was featured in the documentary film on Black Genocide: Maafa21, watch here

clenard-childressAccording to the Rev. Clenard Childress, “The hijacking of the Civil Rights Movement by homosexual activists took a quantum leap with the barring of Donnie McClurkin from the Martin Luther King Concert celebration. Such a strategic strike by the LBGT could not have happened without the compliance of the normal House Negroes of the Democrat Party, who also profit from the plight of African-Americans. This has become typical of Democrat administrations. African-Americans must take complete notice of the fact that the voice of the Black Community was completely disregarded for a few disgruntled homosexual activists. Mayor Vincent Gray, of Washington, DC due to pressure from the Lesbian Bisexual Gay Transgender lobby requested internationally known gospel singer, and Senior Pastor of Perfecting Faith Church, of Freeport, New York, be banned from performing. Mayor Vincent Grey, and undoubtedly the White House, all agreed…..I might also add, we should not think for a second that Barack Obama, who will be speaking at the Lincoln Memorial next Wednesday, could not have intervened on the behalf of Donnie McClurkin, but refused. The president could have mirrored Martin Luther king’s response to the insistence of the gay agenda being in the platform, by Bayard Rustin in 1963, which resulted in Rustin leaving the movement. When Martin L. King spoke at the Lincoln Memorial, he stood strong to his moral convictions; the President doesn’t have the same moral convictions as Martin, and in comparison, they are miles apart, and thus you have the expulsion of Donnie McClurkin from the performance. It is clear to one and all, the homosexual agenda trumps the Black Church in urban communities.

Ryan_Scott_Bomberger_2According to Ryan Bomberger: “Sharpton is no Martin Luther King. MLK’s dream didn’t envision freedom through governmental dependency, redefining marriage, generational poverty, epidemic fatherlessness, transgendered bathrooms, racial division, less religious liberty, and over 55 million aborted. Preaching victimhood and intolerance, this “anniversary” event sadly will not reflect the greatness that occurred 50 years ago. Even Dr. Alveda King, niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, expressed that she can’t have anything to do with Sharpton’s event because it has little to do with the principles that her uncle stood and died for.”


MLK On the day after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, a memorial service was held at Howard University in Washington, DC. As mourners left the auditorium, they encountered about 600 people attending a rally outside. Several speakers were heard warning the crowd that population control was being used as a weapon of black genocide. Among the speakers who gave this warning was noted civil-rights activist Stokely Carmichael.

Bernice King, the daughter of the late Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., said on Thursday that “life begins in a woman’s womb.


“Many people do not yet recognize and accept the fact that the movement, which my father led, would not have happened – as you have heard many stories today – without women.
The idea of the Montgomery bus protest began with women. And it was women who made it possible to mobilize and organize and bring the community together.And so, in many respects, it all begins – as does life – begins in a woman’s womb. And so we incubate, we nurture and we birth out things and we can never, ever forget that.
And we must always ensure that the story is told and the record is accurate,
” King said.

“Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “The Negro cannot win as long as he is willing to sacrifice the lives of his children for comfort and safety.” How can the “Dream” survive if we murder the children? Every aborted baby is like a slave in the womb of his or her mother. . . . If the Dream of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is to live, our babies must live. Our mothers must choose life. If we refuse to answer the cry of mercy from the unborn, and ignore the suffering of the mothers, then we are signing our own death warrants.

I too, like Martin Luther King, Jr., have a dream. I have a dream that the men and women, the boys and girls of America will come to our senses, and humble ourselves before God Almighty and pray for mercy, and receive His healing grace. I pray that this is the day, the hour of our deliverance. May God have mercy on us all.” ~ Alveda King.

Greeting Pres Obama at Ohio State U with the truth of abortion

Posted in Abortion, Obama with tags , , , , , , , on October 21, 2010 by saynsumthn

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Greeting Pres Obama at Ohio State U with the tr…, posted with vodpod

Time uses graphic image of Afghan woman whose nose and ear has been cut off- for cover

Posted in Abortion, Graphic Images, Islam with tags , , , , , , on August 2, 2010 by saynsumthn

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Time uses graphic image of Afghan woman whose n…, posted with vodpod

The Plight of Afghan Women: A Disturbing Picture

TIME Magazine Defends Use of Graphic Images

Columbus, OH – August 2, 2010 – The August 9, 2010 issue of TIME Magazine defends the use of graphic images in showing the brutality of the Taliban in their treatment of women.

Interestingly, TIME makes a case for children seeing these images as well.

This is part of the magazine’s rationale:

“I’m acutely aware that this image will be seen by children, who will undoubtedly find it distressing. We have consulted with a number of child psychologists about its potential impact. Some think children are so used to seeing violence in the media that the image will have little effect, but others believe that children will find it very scary and distressing – that they will see it, as Dr. Michael Rich, director of the Center on Media and Child Health at Children’s Hospital Boston, said, as “a symbol of bad things that can happen to people.” I showed it to my 2 young sons, 9 and 12, who both immediately felt sorry for Aisha and asked why anyone would have done such harm to her. I apologize to readers who find the image too strong, and I invite you to comment on the image’s impact.”
–Richard Stengel, Managing Editor, TIME Magazine

Could this same case be made for using graphic images to show the abuse of unborn children from abortion?

The pro-life group – Center for Bio-ethical Reform (CBR) argues “Yes” :

TIME, interestingly enough, makes the same case CBR has made for years. Photos of abortion need to be seen to understand the brutality of abortion.
Question: Why does TIME or any other mainstream magazine have a double standard when it comes to showing abortion in their publications?
Answer: Americans are not complicit in, or complacent towards the mangling of women, but they are responsible for millions of abortion deaths. Few Americans will defend the type of injustice visited on Afghan women by the Taliban, but millions of Americans are killing their children and TIME doesn’t want to offend that portion of their readership who support abortion.
Sadly, it is a simple as that.