Archive for breast cancer

Experts address link between abortion and breast cancer in powerful documentary film

Posted in abortion breast cancer link, Breast Cancer with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 14, 2017 by saynsumthn

 

Dr. Angela Lafranchi, Breast Cancer Surgeon

Experts interviewed in the controversial film, “Hush: the Documentary,” which investigates the effects of abortion on women, claim that women aren’t being told the truth about the link between abortion and breast cancer, despite studies that show the claim to be true.

Pro-choice film director Punam Kumar Gill went out of her way to speak with experts on both sides of the debate. “Of all the contested health care risks around abortion, the abortion breast cancer link was especially troubling to me,” she states. According to Gill, at the time the film was produced, there were only five states that required women to be told that there is an increased risk of breast cancer from abortion.

Screenshot via “Hush: the Documentary”

In her team’s attempt to hear all sides, Gill spoke with former abortionist David Grimes, described by her as a “renowned expert” on abortion in the film. Grimes denied a higher risk of breast cancer for women who have had abortions, comparing claims to the contrary to “an old dog that they keep on flogging.” By “they” he means pro-life experts who have published their own studies.

Grimes then claimed that (in his words) the “small group” that “holds these views” tend to “not be physicians” and not “understand what a woman goes through.” He then disdainfully claimed that the “common theme” among these experts is “religiosity.”

Dr Joel Brind

But Grimes apparently didn’t do his homework before making those remarks; as the film also showed, there are several highly credentialed experts who believe that an abortion-breast cancer link is evident.

One of those experts is Dr. Joel Brind, a professor of human biology and endocrinology who has studied the topic extensively. Dr. Brind acknowledged that it is his belief that abortion is not good for women or children, and that although women legally have a choice to have an abortion, the choice should be an informed one.

In his research, Brind reviewed 23 studies (a meta-analysis) and, as the film points out, found a “30 percent increased risk of breast cancer for women with abortion histories.” Dr. Brind, along with three other researchers, published these findings in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health in 1996.

Although the group of authors called for additional research on the link, the study concluded in part, “The results support the inclusion of induced abortion among significant independent risk factors for breast cancer, regardless of parity or timing of abortion relative to the first term pregnancy.”

But because Dr. Brind holds a pro-life view on abortion, his work has been largely discounted. “The major criticism against him was because he’s pro-life, his science is questionable, and his findings are part of an anti-abortion agenda to scare women,” the Hush film states.

Dr Joel Brind (Image credit: Hush the Documentary)

But, what isn’t mentioned by critics of Brind’s conclusions on the abortion-breast cancer link is that one of Brind’s co-researchers is pro-choice. Brind says he was unaware of this fact until after the research was published because when they did the research, “their personal views on the subject of abortion never came up,” he explained.

Brind told Gill that author Vernon M. Chinchilli only disclosed his pro-choice views on abortion after the study was complete. Brind explained, “We did all this work together. Hours and hours of working together in studying the data and comparing notes and talking about it, and you know what? Whether he or I or anyone else in the group was pro-life or pro-choice – it never came up.”

“This is about science. This is about the effect on women and whether or not abortion increases the risk of breast cancer. Period,” he added.

Dr. Angela Lanfranchi and Punam Kumar Gill in Hush the Documentary

Another expert interviewed in the film is Dr. Angela Lanfranchi, a breast surgeon. She pointed to alarming data that shows a drastic increase in breast cancer among young women, something she said was evident in her practice as a breast surgeon. “There was one month where I saw three young women in their thirties with breast cancer and it was very depressing. And I was trying to figure out why that was happening.”

“The textbooks had information… about one of the risk factors being abortion. And I started asking a complete reproductive history.”

Dr. Lanfranchi recounted discovering that patients with “very aggressive forms of breast cancers” had abortions in their history. She then found out about Dr. Brind’s meta-analysis study, recounting, “I said, okay, it’s just not my random clinical experience.” But Lanfranchi pointed out that over the years, she has discovered that this information “was not going to get out.”

Dr. Ian Gentles in Hush the Documentary

Filmmaker Gill also spoke to Dr. Ian Gentles, a professor at Tyndale University College and a co-author of the book “Complications,” described in the film as the “world’s most comprehensive investigation of abortion and women’s health.”

According to a review of the book published by LifeSiteNews, it “[…] includes over 100 interviews with women who have had abortions… using data gathered from over 650 papers, mostly in medical and psychological journals.” It “concludes that abortion is detrimental in all areas of women’s health, and includes substantive evidence demonstrating the link between abortion and a variety of health problems including breast cancer, infertility, autoimmune disease and mental health problems along with a multitude of other complications.”

“The big physical hazard is breast cancer,” Dr. Gentles told Gill. Gentles stated that there have been many studies that show a “real statistically significant link between abortion and breast cancer.”

Studies show link between abortion breast cancer (via Hush: the Documentary)

“In other words,” Gentles said, “if you have an abortion  – you have a 30 or 40 percent increased chance of coming down with breast cancer later. And this has been established in studies all over the world, not just in the United States, but also France, China, Japan, India, which have documented that indeed there is a higher rate of breast cancer among women who have abortions.”

Gill made it clear at the end of her documentary that she remains in favor of abortion, but believes women should be informed about potential risks such as breast cancer. The “Hush” production team claims to have made every effort to speak with experts across the political and ideological spectrum as well as medical organizations which study breast cancer risks. But Gill found that these groups were silent and refused requests to go on film to defend their findings.

“Those who completely deny any long-term risks have artfully shut down the conversation,” Gill concluded in the film. “Because they fear if they conceded the procedure has adverse effects, abortion will be banned. Meanwhile, nonpartisan researchers run for cover from cross fire.”

Gill added, “It’s true the long-term health risks associated with abortion are generally promoted by those who want abortion gone. But this did not make the information untrue.”

The pro-choice filmmaker expressed her desire for women to get all the information they need to make healthy decisions about their own lives. “Although I still believe in a woman’s right to abortion,” she said, “I don’t see abortion as liberating as I once assumed it was. At least not for the women who’ve experienced adverse physical and psychological effects.”

If abortion is going to be legal and women are to have the freedom to choose it, “they should also have the right to know,” Gill stated. “Women facing an unplanned pregnancy deserve health information that is not clouded by religion, fear, or politics.”

Be informed. Review the information for yourself.

Author’s Note: “Hush: the Documentary” is published by Mighty Truth Productions Inc. and is available for purchase here.

  • This article is reprinted with permission. The original appeared here at Live Action News.

Save

Save

$465K from Komen to Planned Parenthood which harvests baby parts

Posted in Komen, Planned Parenthood and Komen with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on July 29, 2015 by saynsumthn

Breast cancer non-profit Susan G. Komen said in a July 2015 press release that their Affiliates fund “breast cancer screening and outreach programs” at 11 Planned Parenthood centers in local communities, with grants totaling $465,000.

Komen 2015 Planned Parenthood

This mammogram page from Komen’s website updated the July of 2015 shows Komen referring to Planned Parenthood:

Komen Planned Parenthood

Yet, pro-lifers have documented that Planned Parenthood does NOT perform mammograms!

Komen came under fire in 2012 for funding the abortion clinic chain to the point that they removed the organization from their list of grantees. But, they soon reversed that position and apologized agreeing to fund Planned Parenthood once again.

A 2014 report by the LA Times revealed how much support Komen lost from the Planned Parenthood controversy:

    with its release of its latest financial statements, the cost of that decision can be measured: It’s more than $77 million, or fully 22% of the foundation’s income. That’s how much less the Dallas-based foundation collected in contributions, sponsorships and entry fees for its sponsored races in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, compared with the previous year. The raw figures are these: In the most recent fiscal year Komen booked $270 million; the year before that, Komen booked $348 million.

    Last year’s decline was a continuation of a slightly longer trend. In fiscal 2011 the organization collected $367 million. Komen officials are candid in attributing much of last year’s sharp decline to the Planned Parenthood controversy, though they also point to the general economic slump. Participation in the group’s signature Race for the Cure events is also down.

Planned-Parenthood-sells-aborted-baby-body-parts-CMP-2-209x198

Despite being founded in racist eugenics and covering for pedophiles, Planned Parenthood has recently come under fire after their top medical doctors were caught on camera admitting to gruesome practices of harvesting the organs from the babies they abort.

The undercover videos from the Center for Medical Progress have been going viral causing Americans to express outrage and demanding that Planned Parenthood be investigated and defunded.

The third video released shows the aborted babies inside Planned Parenthood’s path lab and have left American breathless to the evil this organization commits.

Now, blogger Jill Stanek has discovered that Planned Parenthood has hired crisis management firm SKDKnickerbocker “as it scrambles to deal with the ongoing scandal”

This after their original PR Firm sent out a statement calling the grisly operation of trafficking in human baby parts “humanitarian undertakings.”

Planned Parenthood by the ABORTION numbers

Posted in Planned Parenthood's numbers with tags , , , , , , on September 5, 2012 by saynsumthn

Planned Parenthood claims to provide 11 million “services” in America each year. From this overly inflated number, they calculate that the 329,445 abortions they committed in their last reported year amounts to only 3 percent of their services.

Planned Parenthood’s latest report states that it performed “11 million services during nearly five million clinical visits.” So, now their abortion number jumps to 6.6 percent of clinic visits were for abortions. That’s right 6.6 percent of all visits to Planned Parenthood result in an abortion.

But is that the full picture?

Abortions:

Planned Parenthood claims that all those “services” it provides only go to 3 million women. So by it’s own admission, 11 percent of the women that visit a Planned Parenthood clinic in any given year obtain an abortion there.

51 percent of Planned Parenthood’s yearly clinic income – comes from abortion. According to Planned Parenthood’s own apologist, Media Matters, its “total revenue from abortion services was approximately $164,154,000,” a year. Accordingly, over 51 percent of Planned Parenthood’s clinic income comes from abortion.In addition to its $320.1 million in clinic income and $223.8 million in private donations, Planned Parenthood receives $487.4 million dollars a year from taxpayers. And that number is drastically increasing. Taxpayer funding for the abortion giant has more than doubled in the last decade.

Over 46 percent of its $1 billion total annual revenue comes from the government – from our tax dollars.

40 percent of all reported abortions committed in the United States occur at a Planned Parenthood clinic, making it by far the largest abortion provider in America.

This is the most hidden statistic of the abortion industry. Abortions caused by abortion pills are not reported on any medical chart or to any government agency. If the abortion industry could have a “dirty little secret,” this would be it.

We do know, however, how many abortion pills Planned Parenthood dispenses. Planned Parenthood’s last report notes that it gave out 1,461,816 “emergency contraception kits,” i.e. abortion pills, in a year – much of which would have been paid for through Title X, taxpayer funds.

“Other Services”

    Prenatal services

: (those services provided to women who choose to keep their baby) account for a measly 0.28 percent of all services provided.
According to 2009 reports by Planned Parenthood the abortion giant offered only 5,000 prenatal clients versus well over 300,000 abortions.

    Adoptions

: 841 adoption referrals made by Planned Parenthood in their last reported year amount to a whopping 0.0076 percent of services rendered.

READ MORE HERE

Black Genocide in America, an interview with Rev. Clenard Childress

Posted in Abortion, Black Abortion Stats, Black Babies, Black Church, Black Conservative, Black Genocide, Black Pastor, Clenard Childress, Maafa21, Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood, Population Control, pro-choice with tags , , , , , , , , , on March 7, 2011 by saynsumthn

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Black Genocide in America, an interview with Re…, posted with vodpod

Learn about Black Genocide – watch the documentary Maafa21

FDA’s eugenics rationing ideology: deny life saving cancer drugs while approving abortion pills

Posted in Abortion, Abortion death, Abortion pill, Death Panels, Ella One, Eugenics, FDA, RU-486 with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on December 17, 2010 by saynsumthn

The FDA seems to be picking and choosing it’s approvals of drugs in an interesting way. The FDA will begin denying Avastin to breast cancer patients but will graciously offer the creator of the drug a final show trial of a hearing in 60 days. Cancer patients claim it saves their lives- but- is this about safety or about rationing?

But controversy is the name of the game for the FDA, they seem to be cutting out drugs that could save or prolong lives, while approving drugs that take lives.

Case in point: Ella One- a new abortion drug approved just weeks ago:

A controversial new form of abortion pills known as “ella” is now available to American women for the first time, the company selling the drug announced Wednesday.

Ella, which can prevent a pregnancy as many as five days after sex, can be obtained by U.S. women who get a prescription from a doctor, according to an announcement by Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. of Morristown, N.J. The medication can even be obtained through an online pharmacy, the company said. The wholesale price will be $35.75.

The Food and Drug Administration approved Ella in August.

According to the largest woman’s group: Concerned Women for America: Ella or the (ulipristal) abortion drug

• The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is deliberately misleading women by mislabeling Ella as a contraceptive and not an abortion drug. While women may be comfortable using contraception, many would object to taking an abortion drug.

• Mislabeling Ella deceptively skirts federal laws on abortion. Because it is not defined as an abortion drug, it is likely that federal tax dollars will pay for it.

• Ella is chemically similar to the abortion drug RU-486 (mifepristone) and operates the same way. Ella blocks progesterone receptors, interfering with the uterine lining. Embryos cannot implant or, if already implanted, die from lack of nutrition.

• Advocates for Ella claim it only delays ovulation, but they refuse to acknowledge that the drug is — and acts — like RU-486.

• The FDA information for doctors admits Ella caused abortions in animals. It states, “Embryofetal loss was noted in all pregnant rats and in half of the pregnant rabbits …[Ella] caused pregnancy termination in 2/5 [of pregnant monkeys].”

• Human trials indicate that Ella may cause miscarriages or birth defects in babies that survive. Incredibly, FDA Advisory Committee members recommended that long-term studies not be undertaken to investigate the outcome of existing pregnancies (i.e. if the drug causes birth defects) because negative reports would likely outweigh positive. Instead, the FDA leaves it up to women to find out by experience. It admits on the drug label, “There is little information on whether ella would harm a developing baby.” The FDA put the drug company’s interests above the interest of patients.

And another abortion drug approved by the FDA is RU-486 and was approved without adequate trials and resulted in several women dying from a bacterial infection. Over 1,000 adverse events have been reported, including seven deaths. The FDA is treating Ella in the same careless manner, putting women at risk. CWA reports that, abortion providers flagrantly violate the FDA restrictions on RU-486. It is fully expected that abortionists will give Ella to women beyond the five-day approved usage period, taking advantage of its deadly capabilities to cause an abortion.

Back to Ella One:

• Trials indicate that frequent use of Ella may lead to high levels of toxicity. Yet, proper trials to discover what kind of complications could occur were not performed.

• Ella was tested on women above 16 years old. Yet it will be given to younger girls.

• Women will become victims to Ella being slipped to them without their knowledge or consent by boyfriends who do not want the woman to have a baby. This abuse has already occurred numerous times with other abortion-inducing drugs.

Women need a prescription for ella, but they can “keep a supply at home” — which means administration of the drug won’t necessarily be monitored to prevent someone from, say, taking an elevated dose after the recommended five days, which could result in the abortion of an implanted embryo. Reassurances along the lines that “it probably wouldn’t, if used correctly” are…not all that reassuring.

And then there is the question of who will be paying for Ella:
Critics are already concerned that ella’s approval as a contraceptive will make it eligible to receive federal tax subsidies, which are banned for the abortion pill RU-486. They also are concerned that ella will be included in the services that health plans will have to pay for under the new health-care overhaul law.

“By misclassifying ella as emergency contraception, this administration has paved the way to covertly allow federal funding for abortion,” said Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.), who called on Obama to issue an executive order prohibiting federal funds from paying for ella.

The Family Research Council has compiled an article titled “Myth and Fact: The Truth about ella and How It Works” with more information. The gray area in the “it’s contraception, not an abortifacient” argument gets grayer all the time.

So now the FDA has approved a series of “Emergency Contraception” – pills that can be taken “after conception” which are in fact abortive, and they are marketing them as “contraception”.

In other words, they are redefining when life begins from “conception” to “implantation”, and our young people especially are being fooled.

Another such abortion pill approved by the FDA is called: PlanB.

Plan B prevents a pregnancy by administering high doses of a hormone that mimics progesterone. It works primarily by inhibiting the ovaries from producing eggs. Critics argue that it can also prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in the womb, which some consider equivalent to abortion.

And this does not take into account the many risks associated with the various birth control pills the FDA has approved without proper testing- read this: Dying for birth control?

So..we have to ask: Why is the FDA approving all these abortion drugs while pulling cancer drugs?

Can you say – Death Panels and Eugenic?

Just Say’n !

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Historical Information on RU-486: Abortion pill RU-486 created as an inexpensive drug for eugenic “population control” has connection to Nazi gas Zyklon B

September 28, 2010, marked the ten-year anniversary of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) approval of Mifepristone (popularly known as RU-486).

These following quotes/facts are from the powerful documentary : Maafa21 which shows how the US government and other Elites are using abortion to limit black births:

When three pro-choice researchers investigated the original motive behind the creation of the abortion pill, RU486, what they discovered was that the scientific basis for it was actually developed in United States during the 1960s by the National Institutes of Health at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. In their 1991 book, these researchers claimed to have found data showing that this agency was looking for an inexpensive and effective drug to control the populations of foreign countries that the government had classified as “under-developed.” The abortion pill was to be tested in these environments and, if successful, the plan called for it to then be introduced into Black, Hispanic and Native-American communities in the United States.

After the abortion pill, RU486, was approved for sale in the U.S., the controversy surrounding it kept the abortion lobby from being able to find an American company to produce it. That forced them to look for a foreign manufacturer and, after an eight-year search, a company owned by the Chinese government agreed to manufacture the drug for the U.S. market. The company’s management made this decision after the Rockefeller Foundation agreed to provide financial backing for the project.

Minute 3 and 8 Minutes

Connection between Rockefeller and RU486. At the end of World War II, the German chemical manufacturer, I.G. Farben, was identified as the company that supplied the gas used in the Nazi concentration camps. The gas was called Zyklon-B and evidence later showed that Farben’s executives knew how it was being used. In fact, evidence was uncovered to indicate that Farben engineers had actually designed the gas chambers. This led to some of them being tried at Nuremberg for crimes against humanity including genocide and slavery.

After the war, I.G. Farben would change its name and become known as Hoechst AG. One of Hoechst’s subsidiaries, Roussel Uclaf, is the French company that developed RU486. The same company that produced the gas used in the Nazi death camps also produced the abortion pill RU-486

In June of 2006, shortly after a FOIA Act granted Judicial Watch uncovered government documents on RU-486, called “The Clinton RU-486 Files,” the Interim reported that, In his first official act as president, Clinton ordered the Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration to co-ordinate the marketing of abortion drug RU-486 on American soil.

Clinton had previously received advice from Ron Weddington, whose wife argued the pro-abortion side in the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case. In a January 1992 letter supporting the legalization of RU-486, Weddington made a Brave New World-style pitch on socio-economic grounds, arguing: “Something’s got to be done very quickly. Twenty-six million food stamp recipients is more than the economy can stand.”

Weddington went on to write that the next president should “start immediately to eliminate the barely educated, unhealthy and poor segment of the country,” as “our survival depends upon our developing a population where everyone contributes. We don’t need more cannon fodder. We don’t need more parishioners. We don’t need more cheap labour. We don’t need more babies.”

The report brings to light a number of disturbing revelations, including the use of official U.S. political, economic and diplomatic pressure that was used to persuade the RU-486 manufacturer, Roussel Uclaf, to make the drug available to American consumers. In one confidential memo, then-HHS Secretary Donna Shalala mentioned that she and then-FDA Commissioner David Kessler personally changed Roussel Uclaf’s position.

Interestingly, the documents also show that Roussel Uclaf offered to give the RU-486 patent to the U.S. government at no cost, in order to protect itself from legal liability in case anything went wrong.

Clinton obtained the patent by writing an official letter to Roussel Uclaf, saying the U.S. required “safe and effective medical treatment,” and thanking the company on behalf of “the women of America.”

According to Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton, the drug has claimed the lives of 560,000 children and at least six women in the United States, in part because the Clinton administration pressured the FDA to circumvent the usual requirements for certifying a drug as “safe and effective” in order to bring RU-486 to market. “This dangerous abortion pill needs to be pulled off the market immediately,” he said.

From Maafa21, Exerts from the Letter Ron Weddington sent to President Bill Clinton (Clip below) “ … 26 Million food stamp recipients is more than the economy can stand.” • “… you can start immediately to eliminate the barely educated, unhealthy and poor segment of our country. No, I’m not advocating some sort of mass extinction of these unfortunate people. Crime, drugs and disease are already doing that.” • “I am not proposing that you send federal agents armed with Depo-Provera dart guns to the ghetto. You should use persuasion rather than coercion.” • “Our survival depends upon our developing a population where everyone contributes. We don’t need more cannon fodder. We don’t need more parishioners. We don’t need more cheap labor. We don’t need more poor babies.

Pregnant with breast cancer, mother refuses abortion

Posted in Abortion, Breast Cancer with tags , , , on October 6, 2010 by saynsumthn

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Pregnant with breast cancer, mother refuses abo…, posted with vodpod

Ignoring Black Abortions

Posted in Abortion, birth control, Black Genocide, Black History Month, Black Victims, Civil Rights, Clenard Childress, Eugenics, Guttmacher, Life Dynamics, Maafa21, Margaret Sanger, Mark Crutcher, Planned Parenthood, Population Control, pro-choice, Pro-Life, Rockefeller, Roosevelt, RU-486, Slavery, Sterilizing agents in Drinking Water, Uncategorized, United Nations, Violence against women with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on December 3, 2009 by saynsumthn

Ignoring Black Abortions

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about "Ignoring Black Abortions", posted with vodpod

Ignoring issue of black abortions

Sunday, January 11, 2009 By Julia Duin

It arrived in my e-mail last Friday; a press release about a journalism conference on mortality rates for black Americans.

I looked at the conference description, but there was nothing there about black abortions.

Or why blacks, who make up about one-eighth of the U.S. population, have more than one-third (37 percent) of America’s 1.2 million annual abortions. Or how, if you take 37 percent of America’s 45 million abortions between 1973 and 2005, you come up with 17 million people.

    The National Association of Black Journalists’ Conference on Health Disparities

has all the trappings of a well-run effort. Speakers at the Jan. 30-31 meeting in Atlanta include Dr. Kevin Fenton of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Marian Wright Edelman of the Children’s Defense Fund, Phill Wilson of the Black AIDS Institute and Linda Blount of the American Cancer Society.

The focus is on enlightening journalists on health issues that plague blacks, such as mental health issues from incarceration, heart disease, breast cancer, strokes, HIV/AIDS and childhood obesity.

No mention of a procedure that ends one out of every three black pregnancies?

According to the Guttmacher Institute, which compiles reproductive health statistics, black women abort their children at five times the white rate and twice the Hispanic rate. The rate is 11 abortions per 1,000 white women, 28 for every 1,000 Hispanic women and 50 for every 1,000 black women.

I contacted the NABJ and asked why there was not at least one workshop on this topic. Everyone knows abortion is connected to health care. Ask Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The conference organizer said she had never seen the figures I was quoting — sort of like a Jewish reporter professing ignorance of the Holocaust.

Please. The Guttmacher Institute should be on the Rolodex of every health reporter. Abortion is the country’s most common surgical procedure. One of every four pregnancies is terminated this way. Women who get abortions are mostly young, poor, single, and black or Hispanic.

I was told the NABJ’s schedule was too full for yet another workshop. At best, unplanned pregnancy might be dealt with during a session on women’s health, but not, she said, as a morals or values issue.

So, religion is simply irrelevant here?

Day Gardner, director of the National Black Pro-Life Union, says abortion clinics are purposely located in minority neighborhoods.

“A lot of people don’t report abortions in the African-American community,” she said. “African-American people are culturally pro-life. Generally, we have larger numbers of children than white people do. I was one of seven children. My mother was one of nine.

“But this is a silent killer among African Americans. We don’t talk about it. Millions of African Americans – including the black media – don’t know the statistics on this. We think, abortion must be a thing for white people because they are the only ones talking about it.”

For her, abortion is all about health. “Abortion is the Number One Killer of African Americans!” her Web site proclaims.

“Women who’ve had abortions have emotional issues and their breast cancer rates are higher,” she assured me. “Abortion is decimating us as a community.”

• Julia Duin’s “Stairway to Heaven” column runs Thursdays and Sundays. Contact her at jduin@ washingtontimes.com.

For more on Black Genocide from Abortion check the film: Maafa21 ( Clip Below)