Archive for the Planned Parenthood three percent myth Category

No, the sky won’t fall if Planned Parenthood is defunded. Here’s why.

Posted in Cecile Richards, FQHC, Planned Parenthood and FQHC, Planned Parenthood three percent myth with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on August 3, 2017 by saynsumthn

If you listen to the pundits who support Planned Parenthood, the sky will surely fall if the abortion chain is defunded.

If even one Planned Parenthood affiliate or center has to close as a result of defunding, they say, the patients Planned Parenthood serves will have no access to health services elsewhere. This is utter nonsense, of course.

The claim that removing federal dollars from Planned Parenthood will shutter their doors is ludicrous. As Live Action News has previously reported, the organization’s own annual reports reveal that Planned Parenthood has been netting a profit for many years. Almost every year since 2000, Planned Parenthood’s revenue has exceeded their expenses — not just by a few dollars, but by tens of millions of dollars (yearly surpluses of $12.2 million in 2001 to a high of $155.5 million in 2010). In addition, with the threat of defunding now more real under the newly elected Congress and president, Planned Parenthood has repeatedly claimed that private donations are suddenly flooding into their coffers.

For the sake of argument, let’s imagine what would happen if we applied this same logic — that a profitable organization should be taxpayer funded, merely because closing would disenfranchise its customers — to any other business. Let’s suppose it was thought that department store chains should receive taxpayer funding because online sales are hurting chain stores’ business. The argument could be made that these department stores have served many people, that they are located in many disadvantaged communities, and that poor people who do not have internet access will be disenfranchised if these stores close. Should we then give these stores half a billion taxpayer dollars every year (the amount Planned Parenthood receives) to keep them open?

The truth is that there are Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC) already in place, which could serve the patients Planned Parenthood serves — outnumbering Planned Parenthood centers by the thousands (a 20 to 1 margin)– so why do Planned Parenthood spokespersons (many who earn six-figure salaries) want you to believe that American women could not survive without them?

Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards has even made totally unsupported claims that millions would be without healthcare if Congress votes to defund Planned Parenthood. Richards recently told Rolling Stone:

This is literally whether a young man in Texas can come to us for an STI testing, or whether a woman who has a lump in her breast can come to us in Ohio to have a breast exam or be referred for screenings, or whether a college student or a young person anywhere in the country can come to us for family planning. We’re talking about more than a million-and-a-half people who rely on Planned Parenthood, and for most of them we’re their only medical provider. As all of the medical institutions have said: There’s no one to take our place providing low- and moderate-income people with preventive health care. There isn’t any other entity that is doing that work.

Interesting that she mentions the breast screenings, because Planned Parenthood, as Live Action has documented, does not do mammograms — but FQHCs do.

I am curious, however, as to how the defunding of Planned Parenthood would cause the apocalypse, but closures of other non-profits — specifically hospitals, which one could argue offer far more needed “services” — would not.

Let me explain.

According to a 2015 report published by the Journal for Health Affairs, patient health was not significantly compromised when hospitals closed. The Non-Profit Quarterly reports pointed out with regards to the study that “vulnerable hospitals that have not been financially sustainable, with operating margins of ‑20% on average, have been the first to close, causing public concern that displaced patients will experience declining health and even death when access to care goes away.”

Despite this concern, the 2015 study found “no significant difference between the change in annual mortality rates for patients living in hospital service areas (HSAs) that experienced one or more closures and the change in rates in matched HSAs without a closure…. Nor was there a significant difference in the change in all-cause mortality rates following hospitalization….”

The unknown in the study was how the closures affected low income patients. But according to Non-Profit Quarterly: 

Researchers reported that among Medicare patients there were no substantial changes in admissions, lengths of stay, or readmissions, but also cautioned that the study should not be interpreted to mean that every hospital loss is harmless….

While the study supports the argument that access to care has improved, the data does not, however, tell the whole story. One-third of institutions that were closed were “safety net” hospitals that treated large numbers of low-income and uninsured people. Since only easily-accessed Medicare patient information was reviewed, impact on those populations is still unknown.

Unknown? A study of three hospital closures from 2015, conducted by the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured and the Urban Institute, actually found that lower income and elderly patients were negatively affected and “were more likely to face transportation challenges and thus more likely to delay or forgo needed care.”

A photo of the clinics that outnumber Planned Parenthood 20 to 1.

But in Planned Parenthood’s case, there are already hundreds of FQHC alternatives available, open and ready to serve the public. A December 2015 Congressional Research Service report which compared the services of Planned Parenthood Federation of America-affiliated health centers (PPAHC) to those of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC) found…

  • FQHCs are required to provide primary, preventive, and emergency health services.
  • FQHCs focus on providing more comprehensive primary care, dental, and behavioral health services.
  • FQHCs provide far more services in a given year than do PPAHCs.
  • PPAHCs focus their services on individuals of reproductive age; FQHCs provide services to individuals throughout their lifetimes.
  • FQHCs served 22.9 million people in 2014; PPAHCs served 2.7 million.
  • 358 counties have both a PPAHC and a FQHC.
  • FQHCs also receive federal grants that require them to provide family planning (among other services) to Medicaid beneficiaries.

Planned Parenthood and its supporters want the public to believe that only Planned Parenthood is able to care for the needs of the 2.5 million patients they “serve.” And they will suggest that if they are defunded and close facilities, the hundreds of FQHC that replace them (already in existence and serving patients, mind you) will be overwhelmed with patient influx, thus unable to address the many needs. (This was the same fear that plagued Democrats when they passed the Affordable Care Act, yet they argued that the system would be more than able to handle that influx.)

A study on the effects of the Affordable Care Act, conducted by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and health care company Athenahealth, which gathered data from 15,700 of Athenahealth’s clients, found that new patient visits to primary care physicians only increased slightly. It was anticipated that uninsured patients now gaining insurance might have unmet medical needs, and their demand for services might overwhelm the capacity of primary care doctors. But according to the study, this idea proved false. Kathy Hempstead, director of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, told USA Today that the study “suggests that, even though there’s been a big increase in coverage, it’s a relatively small part of the market and the delivery system is able to handle the demand.”

For years, Planned Parenthood has been closing centers despite a steady increase in funding under the Obama administration. The Congressional Research Service found that the number of PPHAC affiliates and facilities has declined since 2009-2010, when PPFA reported having 88 affiliates (a 32 percent decline) and 840 health centers (a 21 percent decline). And, as of December 20, 2016, there are now only 650 Planned Parenthood centers, indicating a 22.67 percent decline.

In addition, Planned Parenthood patients have also decreased over the years. In 2014, Planned Parenthood saw 2.5 million patients — down a whopping 24.24 percent since 1996, when they saw 3.3 million and received far less government funding ($177.5 million in 1996 compared to $553.7 million in 2014). In contrast, FQHCs have increased the number of patients seen in each year since 2009. From 2009 to 2014, FQHC patients increased from 18.9 million to 22.9 million.

Planned Parenthood is the largest provider of abortion in the nation. Live Action has documented how Planned Parenthood manipulates its own data to cover up the fact that abortion – not women’s health care – accounts for the lion’s share of the corporation’s services for pregnant women.

Defunding the largest chain of abortion clinics will not send millions of patients to their demise — and Planned Parenthood knows this. The truth is that taxpayer dollars can be better spent on real health care organizations that will serve the American public and maintain the sanctity of life in the process.

  • This article is reprinted with permission. The original appeared here at Live Action News.

Is Planned Parenthood ashamed that they provide abortions?

Posted in Planned Parenthood runs from abortion, Planned Parenthood three percent myth with tags , , , , , , , , , , on October 28, 2014 by saynsumthn

A Planned Parenthood affiliate has uploaded a marketing tool which completely leaves out the fact that they provide abortions.

As the nation’s top abortion provider, Planned Parenthood seems to be running away from abortion. They are targeting the general public trying to convince them that they provide “services” that will save lives. The only problem is that no matter what else they do- they kill babies for a living.

PPMM voices of patients

In a video, recently released by Planned Parenthood Mar Monte they once again try and market themselves as a place that provides mammograms. However- if you listen closely to the patient in this video you will hear what pro-lifers have been exposing for years – that they only refer for mammograms:

In this “Voices of our patients” video produced by Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, teacher Doreen Silva explains her visit to the center and tragically how she discovered that she had cancer.

Doreen Silva Teacher PP

She states, “So, after I got the referral from the clinician at Planned Parenthood, I was referred over to the breast center, and they gave me a mammogram, and I was at the hair salon with both my aunt and my mom and we were leaving in the car when we got the phone call and the doctor told me that I had a malignant tumor.”

Stephanie Canales

In a huge over stretch, Stephanie Canales credits the abortion giant with being able to finish college, “If it weren’t for Planned Parenthood, I wouldn’t have been able to afford contraception the first years of college and I wouldn’t have been able to finish my bachelors successfully.”

I have to ask here- how did Planned Parenthood help an intelligent woman finish college? By giving her a discount on birth control? Really? Is this where the new Women’s Empowerment movement is going – to – credit free birth control for all their successes?

Rene Galvan-Macleod PPMM

The PPMM center manager, Rene Galvan-Macleod claims they are extremely diverse stating that their yougest patient is about 2 days old and their oldest is 92 years old.

Galvan-Macleod helps promote the image of Planned Parenthood as a “good place” when he goes on to state, “I was very ignorant to what services Planned Parenthood provided. I walked into a room where there were young babies, there were pregnant women, there were men in their forties and fifties, it was an extremely diverse group which made me feel almost immediately comfortable with.”

I wonder if Mr. Galvan-Macleod will also describe their abortion patients and what he sees in that “experience”- I doubt it!

The video continues with stories of Planned Parenthood rescuing an incarcerated gang-banger to helping a teen through a painful period, a man with an STD, and a woman with a troubled pregnancy. On the surface, these things look noble, but there is one fact Planned Parenthood conveniently leaves out and that is that they also provide abortions.

PPMM Screen

Despite the testimonies on the video, the truth is that Planned Parenthood Mar Monte kills unborn babies. No matter how many testimonies they release you cannot whitewash the blood that is on their hands.

According to their Annual Report, Planned Parenthood Mar Monte killed 18,169 babies with abortions in 2014.

PPMM 2014 Abortions

The stated mission of Planned Parenthood Mar Monte is to, “ensure that every individual has the knowledge, opportunity, and freedom to make every child a wanted child and every family a healthy family.”

PPMM Mission2607e75

On their website, Planned Parenthood Mar Monte describes what they “provide”, let’s review this list and compare it to their marketing video:
birth control
pregnancy testing and options counseling
STD testing and treatment
HIV testing
breast and cervical cancer screening
abortion
prenatal care
pediatrics and adult primary health care.”

Strange, how in this video Planned Parenthood left ABORTION out!

The above video is entitled “The 97% – Voices of our Patients – Planned Parenthood Mar Monte” – because the abortion giant wants you to believe that abortion is only 3% of their “services!”

But a new video from Students for Life dispels this 3% myth: