Archive for the National Organization for (Some) Women Category

Media narrative on feminism is pro-abortion and disregards pro-life opposition

Posted in Betty Friedan, Feminism, Lader, National Organization for (Some) Women, National Organization for Women, NOW, Planned Parenthood abortion plank, Subverted with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on March 26, 2018 by saynsumthn

Sorry, pro-abortion media: Pro-life feminism isn’t going away


On the heels of the #MeToo and #TimesUP movements came International Women’s Day, a date set to celebrate the accomplishments of women and look upon ways to improve their lives. However, the media predictably seems to have chosen to seek out the voices of abortion supporters with regard to feminism, again largely neglecting the thoughts of pro-life feminists.

Yahoo! asked simply, “What is feminism in 2018?” but failed to publish the remarks of a “conservative [female] campus leader” alongside the remarks of other feminists; Yahoo! reserved her thoughts for a completely separate article, essentially segregating her comments from the overall discussion of feminism.

And while USA Today quoted some conservative and pro-life women in a piece they published, asking, “Can you be a Conservative feminist?” the publication failed to point out that pro-life feminism used to be the standard. Early feminist leaders like Susan B. Anthony referred to abortion as “child murder” and viewed it as a means of exploiting both women and children. They demonstrated that true feminism was pro-motherhood, pro-woman, and pro-child.

The fact that conservative feminism was questioned to begin with reveals a deeper problem.


Some mainstream media articles on International Women’s Day included interviews with the head of an abortion rights organization, but failed to give equal time to pro-life leaders. The author of the Yahoo! article, for instance, managed to include the thoughts and statements of NARAL abortion lobby group president Ilyse Hogue but failed to publish remarks from female leaders of national pro-life organizations. Perhaps this was a simple error… or perhaps it wasn’t; after all, pro-life women do not fit into the modern day feminist image or the pro-abortion media narrative on feminism.

But Yahoo News cannot be totally faulted for this way of thinking, since history teaches us that the association of abortion and feminism was by design. National Organization for Women (NOW) founder Betty Friedan, the “mother of the women’s movement” in the 1960s, was herself complicit in silencing pro-life women and allowing them to be systematically pushed out of NOW for one single reason: they opposed abortion. Despite this, NOW was inaccurately dubbed the largest “women’s organization” in the nation, even though the group philosophically discriminated against pro-life members, and a major pro-life women’s group far outnumbered them. While many pro-life feminists in the 1960s and 70s were in agreement with fighting inequality and abuse of women on all fronts, they spoke against NOW’s insertion of abortion into their plank in the late 1960s.

The idea of inserting abortion into NOW’s plank came not from Friedan, but from two men: Larry Lader and Bernard Nathanson. These men were obsessed with decriminalizing abortion as was Planned Parenthood’s then-president, Alan Guttmacher, a former vice president of the American Eugenics Society. Lader, who had known Friedan for many years, authored a biography of Planned Parenthood’s eugenicist founder, Margaret Sanger, and called himself “her disciple.”

Image: Larry Lader and Bernard Nathanson. Nathanson became pro-life.

Larry Lader and Bernard Nathanson — two men behind the original abortion industry in the U.S.

Once these men were successful in convincing Friedan to make abortion a part of NOW’s plank, the group, along with the mostly male-dominated media at that time, deliberately chose to link feminism directly with one issue: abortion. They redefined being a “feminist” and made it so that such a term became synonymous with asserting a woman’s dominance over her preborn child instead of with fighting inequality or fighting abuse, for example. This caused a deep rift between pro-life and pro-abortion feminists — a rift that remains to this day.

Today, we see the effects of this way of thinking, as many women remain silent in the face of real abuses against other women, as in the case of Harvey Weinstein, in which notable female Hollywood actresses failed to speak out to warn vulnerable women in the industry. This was never the intention of true feminism. True feminism spoke up for women as well as those weaker than themselves: their children.

Many of the same Hollywood actors and media outlets that were silent on the Weinstein scandal are equally silent on the fact that Planned Parenthood covers up child sexual abuse, often returning underaged victims of rape and sexual assault into the arms of sexual abusers. This has been documented again and again, but thanks to modern day feminism’s allegiance to abortion, Planned Parenthood remains government-funded, protected, and unaccountable while child victims are left to fend for themselves.

When the media discusses feminism, any perceived threat to “reproductive rights” (another term for “abortion rights”) is always front and center, again making it seem as if all women and all feminists find this to the be the most pressing issue for women, and synonymous with feminism, which is untrue.

A large number of women in the U.S. oppose abortion, at least on some level, and many oppose it altogether. Many women who have experienced abortion come to regret it deeply. Not all women think alike on the issue of abortion.  Unfortunately, because of pro-life feminists’ view that the preborn child in the womb is deserving of equal protection as a human person, their voices are dismissed.

Yahoo! quotes NARAL’s president as stating, “To me, it just seems like a basic, fundamental understanding — it’s cliché at this point: Feminism is the radical notion that women are equal. Period. Full stop.”

Of course women are equal to men. The problem is that pro-abortion feminists don’t believe women are equal to men without abortion. And if this idea about feminism is so “basic,” then why the bias against pro-life feminists? Aren’t they also of the mindset that women are equal to men?

It’s time to end the deliberate sabotaging and outright silencing of pro-life female voices (and importantly, pro-life women of color) in the arena of public debate. It is time for the media to stop pandering to the radical abortion lobby and open the door to female voices from a wider range of thought.

  • This article is reprinted with permission. The original appeared here at Live Action News.

Hillary Clinton the CHAMPION of Abortion and eugenics founded Planned Parenthood

Posted in Hillary clinton, NARAL, National Organization for (Some) Women, NOW, Planned Parenthood Democrat Party, Planned Parenthood Hillary Clinton with tags , , , , , , , , , , on April 13, 2015 by saynsumthn

Sunday, Hillary Clinton announced that she is officially running for president in 2016.

Hillary CLinton 2016 champion abortion

No sooner did she post her tweet that the abortion industry turned inside out in their support of the pro-abortion Democrat presidential candidate.

Planned Parenthood prez, Cecile Richards reiterated Hillary’s commitment to keeping child killing through abortion legal:

Cecile Richards Hillary will keep abortion legal


    ✔️ Stands with PP
    ✔️ Has fought for women & girls
    ✔️ Will keep abortion safe & legal



Planned Parenthood followed Richards lead tweeting this:

PPAC Hillary

Planned Parenthood Ready for Hillary

The largest abortion lobby group in the US, NARAL issued this statement of support for the presidential run of Hillary Clinton:

    “Secretary Clinton is and has always been steadfast in her commitment to building a culture of equality for women starting with a woman’s right to choose her own destiny…She is exactly the kind of leader we need to continue to move our country forward, and we are excited to see her jump into this race. We know that the rights we fight to protect and expand everyday at NARAL Pro-Choice America are more than safe in Secretary Clinton’s hands.”

And tweeted this:

Hillary 2016 NARAL

Abortion Care Network tweeted:

Abortion Care Network Hillary

The radically pro-abortion National Organization for Women (NOW) was ecstatic about a Hillary 2016 campaign:

NOW Hillary CLinton 2

NOW Hillary CLinton

Pro-abortion Emily’s List endorsed Hillary for president:

Emilys list endorses proabortion hillary clinton

Emilys List Hillary 2016

Emilys List Hillary

Hillary Clinton’s support of abortion is no secret and dates back to when Bill Clinton was president.

Hillary will no doubt get more public support from advocates of abortion as the week unfolds.

Meanwhile, the hashtag #WhyImNiotVotingforHillary explodes with critics that say they won’t vote for Hillary because of her support of abortion and eugenics founded Planned Parenthood:


WhyImNotVotingforHillary abortion

WhyImNotVotingforHillary abortion 2

WhyImNotVotingforHillary abortion 3

WhyImNotVotingforHillary abortion 4

WhyImNotVotingforHillary abortion 5

WhyImNotVotingforHillary abortion 6

See also (Hillary Clinton gets Margaret Sanger Award from Planned Parenthood)

Left-Wing Tolerance or Hobby of Hate ?

Posted in Liberal, NARAL, National Organization for (Some) Women, Pro-choice Logic, Pro-choice mocking, Pro-choice People, pro-choice violence with tags , , , , , , , , , , on July 3, 2014 by saynsumthn

Keep Calm BC

The left-wing liberal community are always the first ones crying for tolerance- yet- when things do not go “their way” they are the most hate-filled intolerant people you can imagine.

As Megyn Kelly summed it up on the O’Reilly factor – “This is about the war on the religious right not the war on women.”

Following the ruling granting Hobby Lobby the religious freedom to refuse to fund 4 out of 20 “contraception” devises they deem abortive- left-wing haters began calling for people to burn Hobby Lobby to the ground, have sex in the store and all kinds of other suggestions:

Humanists” have called to Boycott the family chain store:

Hobby Lobby Boycott


The radically pro-abortion and left-wing blog the Daily Kos has also called for a boycott:

Daily Kos HL Boycott

Others are posting ridiculous blogs or memes:

Sharia Lobby

HL Crafts

Still others are entering Hobby Lobby and leaving their opinions loud and clear:

RH REality - Hobby Lobby

Freedom From Religion has paid for an ad in the NY Times:

The ad features Planned Parenthood founder and birth control pioneer Margaret Sanger, whose motto was “No Gods — No Masters,” the ad criticizes the “all-male, all-Roman Catholic majority” on the Supreme Court for putting “religious wrongs over women’s rights.” The ad fails to explain Sanger’s beliefs in eugenics and the way her organizations helped promote forced sterilization of women.

FFReligion Hobby Lobby

And Twitter is filling up with all kinds of mocking of the store, religious freedom:

Baptized at Hobby LobbyHL MOckStole Supplies from HLMocking HL 2

Just following the ruling – pro-choice and left-wing advocates called for Hobby Lobby to be burned to the ground:



Dare of Day

Threats to burn HL

Then came the threats to vandalize Hobby Lobby:

Visit HL to break shit

Jessica Valenti FB page

Just after the decision, Jessica Valenti, a Board Member for NARAL tweeted this hateful suggestion,Maybe women should organize a safe-sex fuck-in at every Hobby Lobby across the country. In the glitter aisle. JUST A THOUGHT.

Safe Sex Fuck In

Others also suggested this:

Sex in Isle

And here is another brilliant suggestion from the NARAL Board Member, “New teen prank suggestion: TP Hobby Lobby with condoms instead of toilet paper.”

TP Hobby Lobby
PRIOR to the Supreme Court Ruling- one pro-choice artist placed Aborted Baby Jesus Dolls inside Hobby Lobby:

Aborted Baby Jesus Hiobby Lobby Gd

As the lies and hate directed at Hobby Lobby continue- the Green family responds in love and says they are grateful for their supporters:

NOW leader: ROE did not give women RIGHT to make abortion decision

Posted in Abortion, National Organization for (Some) Women, National Organization for Women, Right to Privacy, Roe with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on May 7, 2014 by saynsumthn

National Organization for [Some] Women president, Terry O’Neill, agrees with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes that Roe did not give the woman a RIGHT to make a decision on abortion- it gave the “right” to the “doctor” !

NOW Prez Chris Hayes

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes tells his guests that Roe was “about the right of privacy – of the doctor.”

Hayes continues, “I mean the people don’t realize this The finding in Roe, I’m going to read this is – this is the controlling opinion in Roe, Harry Blackmun…

Roe Abortion is Docs DecisionRoe Abortion is Docs Decision 2

Prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and it’s effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman’s attending physician. The decision vindicates the right of the physician to administer medical treatment according to his professional judgment…

Hayes points out, “So even Roe was shot through with this perspective.”


Terry Oneil NOW Prez

National Organization for [Some] Women president, Terry O’Neill agrees and replies, “Even Roe and Chris, it gets worse. The case after Roe, Planned Parenthood V. Casey, Sandra Day O’Connor talking about how women aren’t necessarily the right people to make this decision, that the state should have the right to proselytize her, to pressure her to encourage her to make the decision that that the state wants her to make. Later on in Carhart, in the Carhart case, that upheld the criminalization of a safe abortion procedure, a late-term procedure, Justice Kennedy specifically said it’s okay to criminalize this safe procedure for women because women regret the choice they make. So the law is riddled with distrust of women’s ability to make their decisions.”

The rest of the segment is about placing a Birthing Center where unborn children are delivered alive inside an abortion clinic which murders unborn children. I have already blogged about that Oxymoron here !

Stepford-Aborts: NOW posts ridiculous abortion pledge

Posted in National Organization for (Some) Women, National Organization for Women with tags , , , , , on December 13, 2013 by saynsumthn

StepfordabortsThe National Organization for SOME women (NOW) has posted a ridiculous pledge they expect women to sign in support of abortion.

What a ridiculous concept. NOW has no interest in seeing women be independent.

How do I know- because I was ordered to sit down when I asked some simple questions at a NOW event on a major University.

I simply asked if they supported Late Term Abortion and for that, as a women, I was silenced by their speaker.

But… I see why. NOW wants women to be Stepford-Aborts and repeat their pro-abortion blather and nothing else – and this pledge proves my point:

Abortion Rights Pledge

Suzanne Logan long forgotten, another Maryland Woman dies from abortion and NAF again defends abortion clinics NOT women

Posted in Abortion, abortion clinic safety, Abortion coma, Abortion complication, Abortion death, Abortion injury, Abortion Regulation, Abortionist, National Organization for (Some) Women, pro-choice, Violence against women with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on June 4, 2010 by saynsumthn

The Washington Post Article date: August 13, 1990
Susanne Renee Logan was three months pregnant when she went to Hillview Women’s Medical Surgical Center in Maryland for an abortion. She was given Brevital, an anesthetic meant to lull her to sleep during the procedure.

Minutes after the drug entered Logan’s system, her throat tightened, restricting her breathing and cutting off oxygen to her brain, rescue records show. Eight minutes later, paramedics at the District Heights Volunteer Fire Department received a high priority call: A woman was unconscious; she had no pulse. Logan was left completely paralyzed, her brain so damaged she will never speak again, Logan later DIED.

The Abortionist name was Gideon M. Kioko

From The Washington Post April 11, 2005

Two years after OB-GYN Gideon M. Kioko was found by the Maryland medical board to have mishandled abortions in 1989, he surrendered his license, which allowed him to avoid punishment. In one case, the patient died three days after the abortion; in the second, the woman suffered brain damage and died three years later. He petitioned the board for reinstatement a year later but was turned down. Nearly six years passed before the board restored his license — with conditions.

In the District, however, where Kioko also was licensed, the city’s medical board did not take the same hard line. It allowed him to continue practicing after the Maryland incidents.

Here is an Excerpt from CBS News 60 Minutes Volume XXIII, #32, April 21, 1991, which reported on the case of Suzanne Logan:

VIEIRA: No matter where people stand on the abortion issue, pro-choice or pro-life, nobody wants back-alley abortions, certainly not Susanne Logan, who found what she believed to be a reputable clinic where she could get a legal, safe abortion. Meet Susanne Logan.

[interviewing] Do you remember going to the clinic specifically to get an abortion? [Ms. Logan nods] But you don’t — I’m sorry. You don’t remember what happened inside the clinic? [Ms. Logan shakes her head]

VIElRA: [voice-overl Today, Susanne Logan lives in a Baltimore nursing home. She is almost completely paralyzed, her brain so damaged she will never speak again. She’s now 33 and will spend the rest of her life never understanding what happened to her. Two years ago, Susanne was a waitress struggling to make ends meet when she found herself pregnant. She went to the Hillview abortion clinic in Suitland, Maryland, for what she thought would be a safe, simple, $400 abortion. Susanne was given general anesthesia. Minutes later, according to her attorney, Patrick Malone [sp?], she stopped breathing.

PATRICK MALONE, Susanne Logsn’s Attorney: Apparently, about half-way through the procedure the nurse looked at the patient’s face and noticed that the lips were turning blue, Susanne’s lips. Then all hell broke loose.

911 OPERATOR: [on the phone] Fire and Rescue.

WOMAN: Yes, this is Hillview Women’s Medical Surgical Center at 5408 Silver Hill Load. We have a patient in the exam room who has — you know, we can’t get any pulse or respiration.

VIEIRA: [voice-over] County paramedics who responded to the 911 call reported the clinic in chaos. Hillview workers lacked the right medicine to reverse the effect of the anesthesia. Their emergency equipment was broken, causing Susanne’s brain to go without oxygen for 12 minutes.

Mr. MALONE: The anesthesia was given without any monitoring whatsoever, without an anesthesiologist present, without a nurse-anesthetist present, without the normal safeguards that are part of standard, modern American medical care. I’ve seen a lot of cases and met a lot or doctors and reviewed a lot of records and I’ve never seen anything like this.

VIEIRA: [voice-over] Hillview’s owner is Barbara Lofton [sp?]. For years, Lofton posed as a psychologist and ran mental health clinics until the District of Columbia shut her down for submitting phony Medicaid bills and letting unqualified employees dispense medicine. Undeterred, Lofton went into the abortion business, but D.C. investigators again shut her down, this time for operating without a license. A few months later, she moved the clinic two miles across the state line to Maryland where there are no laws regulating abortion clinics. According to Tony Moore [sp?], a former worker at the clinic, Barbara Lofton, who is not a doctor, continued to flaunt phony professional credentials at Hillview.

TONY MOORE, former Employee, Hillview Clinic: When she first hired me, she introduced herself as “Dr Lofton” and she had a stethoscope which was quite expensive, like, about a $300 model and she wore scrubs and most of the time I saw her, she was answering the phone as “Dr. Lofton.”

VIEIRA: So all the time you were working there, you tbought she was a doctor?

Mr. MOORE: Right.

VIEIRA: [voice-over] But as we said, Lofton isn’t an M.D. and in this videotape deposition for Susanne Logan’s lawsuit, she admits she’s not qualified to practice medicine.

ATTORNEY: [deposition videotape] Have you ever been licensed as any kind of health care provider in any jurisdiction?

BARBARA LOFTON: Owner, Hillvlew Clinic: No.

VIEIRA: [voice-over] Lofton did hire licensed physicians who moonlighted at Hillview, performing up to 25 abortions a day. But when they were unavailable to handle other clinic duties, we’re told she simply took their place. Frequently, Brenda Davis [sp?], a former Hillview employee, assisted her.

[interviewing] Did she perform medical procedures?

BRENDA DAVIS, former Empployee, Hillview Clinic: Pelvic exams, cultures, prescribed medicine.

VIEIRA: [voice-over] Davis says at least one doctor at Hillview would leave blank prescription pads with his signature on them.

Ms. DAVIS: Well, on one night we ran out of signed prescriptions and Barbara was, like, “Oh, I have a pad here,” you know, that the doctor signed. And I said, “OK.” So I went with her and actually what she did, she took a blank pen [sic] and she wrote his name.

VIEIRA: So she forged —

Ms. DAVIS: Yeah. She wrote his name and she said, “Don’t ever tell anyone I did that.”

VIEIRA: [voice-over] Some patients at Hillview claim Lofton has gone even further than that. This patient, Elizabeth, who asked us to disguise her identity, says that when she went to Hillview for an abortion, Barbara Lofton told her she would personally take on her case.

ELIZABETH: former Hillview Patient: She told me that she was Dr. Lofton and she told me that she would do it herself, not to worry.

VIEIRA: So you thought she was a medical doctor?


VIEIRA: [voice-overl Elizabeth is suing Hillview for a badly-performed abortion. Herb Fulcher [sp?] says his girlfriend, Linda Brown [sp?], may soon do the same thing. When he came to pick Linda up at the clinic, Barbara Lofton was waiting for him.

HERB FULCHER: She said “We had problems, accidentally hit an artery.” So I went in the back and they had a sheet wrapped around her bottom, like a baby diaper. And she was just blood everywhere covered. She was just laying in her own blood.

VIEIRA: [voice over] By the time pararmedics got Linda to a hospital, she had almost bled to death. To save her life, doctors performed an emergency hysterectomy. She was 19.

[interviewing] If they hadn’t gotten to you within 10 to 12 minutes you would have died?

LINDA BROWN, former Hillview Patient: Yes.

Mr. FULCHER: Now she’ll never have a child again. That’s what the doctor said. She’ll never be able to have children again.

Ms. LOFTON: [deposition videotape] No matter how good we are, accidents occur.

VIEIRA: [voice-overl Lofton’s idea of an accident is pretty loose, as Susanne’s lawyer, Patrick Malone, discovered.

Mr. MALONE: [deposition videotape] And isn’t that something that you realized before the incident with my client? There were accidents before that incident, weren’t there?

Ms. LOFTON: One.

Mr. MALONE: And that involved a death, did it not?

Ms. LOFTON: It did, in fact.

TAM GRAY [sp?]: It’s sad to think that people can go in and have a safe procedure, what they think is safe, and die.

VIEIRA: [voice-over] Tam Gray thought when her sister went to Hillview that she would have dinner with her that night, but Deborah [sp?] didn’t make it. She died at the clinic.

Ms. GRAY: The outcome was just like a back-alley abortion.

VIEIRA: Dld they say what had happened to her that —

Ms. GRAY: They said something about anesthesia and why that was even administered is still beyond me.

VIEIRA: [voice-over] Deborah paid $200 extra to be put to sleep. Even though abortions can almost always be done with the patient awake, Tony Moore said he knows why the clinic pushed the far riskier option of general anesthesia.

Mr. MOORE: It would be more money. That’s the bottom line. It would have — it would be more money to be put to sleep or twilighted.

VIEIRA: [voice-over] Soon after Hillview gave Deborah the anesthesia, her heart stopped.

[interviewing] I’m with 60 Minutes. Could I talk to you for a minute? I mean, I’m hearing reports of prescriptions being written without a license and botched abortions and —

[voice-over] I wanted to talk to Barbara Lofton about those reports, but Lofton didn’t think there was much to talk about. Initially, neither did any of the abortion rights activists we contacted. As a reporter, I found that many pro-choice leaders knew about problems at Hillview, but didn’t want them publicized. National Abortion Federation head Barbara Radford [sp?] admitted she was just hoping we would go away.

BARBARA RADFORD, Head, National Abortion Federation: Well, I think your first reaction from us was “This is the last thing we need.” We had hoped that it wouldn’t get national publicity because of the political nature of all of this.

VlEIRA: Pro-choice activists worry that clinics like Hillview will be used against them in the bitter political battle over abortion. They fear bad publicity will prompt state legislators to start regulating clinics and that pro-lifers will then use those regulations as a backdoor way to stop abortions. So even though those laws could make clinics sater, they usually fight them.

Mr. MALONE: You have to be licensed in the state of Maryland if you want to open a junkyard and deal in scrap metal, but in the state of Maryland you do not have to be licensed if you want to open an abortion clinic and deal in human lives.

VIEIRA: [voice-over] That’s something State Senator Mary Boergers would like to see changed. She’s pro-choice, but she favors laws to make clinics safer. It’s a position that has cost her support among her pro-choice colleagues.

MARY BOERGER, Maryland State Senator: There’s only so much of a willingness to try to push a group like the pro-choice movement to do what I think is the responsible thing to do because they then treat you as if you’re the enemy.

VIEIRA: [voice-over] But Radford says regulations aren’t necessary because the state already has enough power to go after doctors who work at clinics. True, the state can investigate individual physicians, but when one doctor gets into trouble at Hillview, Lofton simply hires another one. The state can’t touch Lofton or her clinic.

Sen. BOERGER: I think we have the responsibility of coming up with some legislation if we really care about all the women of the state.

Ms. RADFORD: We want to make sure that women have choices when it comes to abortion service and if you regulate it too strictly, you then deny women the access to service.

Sen. BOERGER: When we say what we’re trying to do is guarantee safe abortions and eliminate back-alley, unsafe abortons, and yet you can demonstrate that there’s a woman who’s died and another woman who’s paralyzed, then not only that argument but all arguments from the pro-choice community can become suspect.

VIEIRA: [voice-over] There is no argument on either side that will help Susanne Logan. She spends most of her days alone in the nursing home. She rarely has visitors. Her family lives in California and can’t afford the trip to Baltimore very often.

[interviewing] What do you want now, Susanne? What would you like? [Ms. Logan picks out letters on keypad] To go home.

[on camera] On Friday, a grand jury in the District of Columbia announced that Barbara Lofton was indicted on nine counts of Medicaid fraud in connection with the mental health homes she operated in the District of Columbia. But Hillview is still open. Barbara Lofton is still running it and she denies that she or the clinic have done anything wrong. Are all clinics that perform abortions run by Barbara Loftons? No. Both the National Abortion Federation and Planned Parenthood have strict standards for their member clinics and in 11 states, there are laws governing how abortion clinics are run.

According to Maryland Board of Physicians case # 2005-0499, in December of 2004 a 26-year-old woman came to abortionist Gideon M. Kioko for an abortion. .

There was a myriad of events that combined to make this the worst day of her life. First, there was no one other than Kioko was present for the procedure. Next, the electricity kept going on and off during the abortion.

At noon, the patient reported that she began to feel dizzy and hot and asked Kioko for her cell phone to call her emergency contact. Kioko refused to give it to her. The patient later began to bleed profusely and Kioko told her that he would have to “Cut the baby up” to get it out, but he was unable to get the baby’s head.

Sometime after 2:00 pm, The patient then told abortionist Kioko that she could not breathe and she kept passing out, she asked Kioko to call 911. Instead of calling 911, Kioko called his wife into the clinic.
At 3:50 pm when the bleeding continued, Kioko finally called 911. When emergency officials arrived on the scene, they heard a woman screaming from the back of the office.

They told the board that:

“The woman was bleeding heavily and the baby’s head was still inside her. They reported seeing her naked from the waist down rolling back and forth on the table screaming. She was covered in blood, her legs were bathed in blood, and there were heavy streams of blood spurting from her vagina.”

She was transported to a hospital and where she had to undergo numerous surgeries to correct the procedure.

Here is what a 2008 report from the State of Maryland says about this abortionist:

Gideon Kioko, M.D. v. Maryland State Board of Physicians, (Case No. CAL07-01912,Circuit Court for Prince George’s County). Dr. Kioko appealed the Board’s decision permanently revoking his medical license for his incompetent medical and surgical care of two female patients during abortion procedures. Both patients suffered extensive injuries during the procedures performed by Dr. Kioko, including a perforated uterus, and cervical and vaginal lacerations. One patient also suffered disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, hemorrhagic shock, retained fetal skull and vertebral column. The other patient suffered a perforated bladder, and extensive lacerations of her colon and rectum that required a colostomy. The Board had previously sanctioned Dr. Kioko in 1997 after the deaths of two other female patients who died as a result of anesthesia complications during abortion procedures that he performed. After briefing and oral argument in July, 2007, the circuit court affirmed the Board’s decision.

In 2005 the Washington Post reported on this abortionist here Despite Deaths, D.C. License Upheld City Board Chose Less Severe Penalties After Md. Abortion Complications
By Cheryl W. Thompson Washington Post Staff Writer Monday, April 11, 2005; Page A09

Two years after OB-GYN Gideon M. Kioko was found by the Maryland medical board to have mishandled abortions in 1989, he surrendered his license, which allowed him to avoid punishment. In one case, the patient died three days after the abortion; in the second, the woman suffered brain damage and died three years later. He petitioned the board for reinstatement a year later but was turned down. Nearly six years passed before the board restored his license — with conditions.

In the District, however, where Kioko also was licensed, the city’s medical board did not take the same hard line. It allowed him to continue practicing after the Maryland incidents.
When the board decided to act in 1996, it ignored an administrative law judge’s recommendation to revoke his license. Instead, it placed him on probation, fined him $5,000, ordered community service and banned him from performing abortions in the city for five years. Three months later, the board lifted the abortion ban after a request from Kioko.

“I think they did the right thing,” Kioko said in a recent interview. “They should have just left me alone.”

Kioko, 65, maintained at the time that he did nothing wrong and in neither case was responsible for the anesthesia that was blamed for the problems. “The old story about me was completely twisted,” he said in a recent interview.

In addition to the two deaths in Maryland, which prompted about a dozen people to write letters to city officials urging them to revoke his license, Kioko also had settled a $1 million malpractice lawsuit in 1995 filed by a female patient.

The D.C. medical board reinstated Kioko to unrestricted status in 1999 in an order signed by then-Chairman Robert T. Greenfield Jr., a physician who previously shared a practice with Kioko for 19 years, according to Kioko and board records.

Greenfield, who no longer has a medical practice with Kioko, said he recused himself from board deliberations. But because he was chairman, he said in an interview, “I had to sign it. He came before the board, we looked at his record and . . . deemed him fit to practice.”

Kioko said his working relationship with Greenfield did not play a role in his reinstatement.

“Did he give me a break? No,” Kioko said. “Should the vice chairman have signed it? Probably.”

In August, the medical board received a new complaint about Kioko from Northeast Washington resident Thakerya Drayton, 21, who was referred to Kioko’s clinic when she sought an abortion in 2001.

“I didn’t know anything about him,” she said in an interview.

After the procedure, she said, Kioko sent her to the recovery room for about an hour. “I knew something wasn’t right because of the pain,” she recalled.

When she got home, she was “bleeding out of control,” she said. After a few days, she told her mother, who called an ambulance that took her to Howard University Hospital.
Hospital records state that Drayton suffered an “incomplete abortion.”

Kioko said an incomplete abortion is considered a surgical complication and shouldn’t warrant a complaint to the medical board.

“I know the medical board will respond if they think there’s a serious deviation in standard of care,” he said.

The medical board sent Kioko a letter in September with a copy of Drayton’s complaint and added that he was not obligated to respond. He said he remembers her handwritten complaint.
“Her letter was so poorly written, I couldn’t understand what she was complaining about,” he said.

Kioko said he responded to Drayton’s complaint in December but heard nothing from the board until he contacted it March 17 after being questioned by The Washington Post about the complaint.

James R. Granger Jr., the board’s executive director, told him that the case was closed, Kioko said.

Drayton said that six days later, she received a letter from Granger stating that the case was closed with no action to be taken against Kioko. The board found no evidence of a violation of city law “that would warrant disciplinary action,” Granger said in an interview. It was the first time Drayton had heard from the board since filing the complaint six months ago.

“I thought we would have a meeting with the board and Dr. Kioko,” she said. But the board, she added, was “no help.”


Fast forward to Today – Story Below – Another woman DEAD from botched abortion

Board to discipline doctor in abortion death
Anti-abortion group seeks criminal probe of 2006 death at Severna Park clinic

Published 06/02/10

A group of anti-abortion organizations yesterday called for criminal prosecution of a Severna Park doctor facing disciplinary action today for a 2006 abortion that led to the death of a woman.

Members of the Living Hope for Life and Defend Life held a news conference in Baltimore to urge the Maryland Board of Physicians to severely discipline Dr. Romeo A. Ferrer.

The state board has previously found that Ferrer failed to meet the standard of quality care in the 2006 incident. It will decide how to punish him in a case resolution conference in Baltimore today. He faces various disciplinary sanctions that could include revocation of his license, suspension or reprimand, as well as a fine.

The anti-abortion groups will forward their complaint to the county State’s Attorney’s Office to see if the doctor’s conduct can be classified as criminal gross negligence. The office has yet to receive any information on the case, a spokeswoman said.

“Even if you don’t share our group’s view on life … you would want such malpractice out of the marketplace,” said attorney Matt Paavola, who is working with Defend Life. “Perhaps you share the same reason for having an abortion (as the patient), but you don’t want practitioners who are so careless that the woman dies.”

Calls to Ferrer’s office were referred to the communications office at the National Abortion Federation in Washington, D.C.

Spokeswoman Melissa Fowler said abortion is one of the “safest and most commonly provided medical procedures” and that credit for its safety record can be attributed to the “specialized quality care provided by clinics like Gynecare Center,” where Ferrer had an office.

“We value our patients and strive to provide the highest quality care,” Fowler wrote in an e-mail. “To preserve our patients’ privacy and confidentiality, we do not release details about their care.”

On Feb. 3, 2006, a 21-year-old woman went to Ferrer’s office at the Gynecare Center in Severna Park seeking an abortion. The unidentified Baltimore woman was 16 weeks pregnant, had a 3-year-old son and previously had two abortions without suffering any complications, according to the Board of Physicians’ complaint.

She sought an abortion because she couldn’t afford another child and came with a female friend because her family did not know about her pregnancy.

The patient signed a form authorizing an abortion procedure that used anesthesia and medication as necessary, but Ferrer, according to the board complaint, advised the staff that general anesthesia is not used at the clinic. The facility uses “conscious sedation,” referred to as “twilight sleep.”

The abortion was completed by 1:45 p.m., but a surgical assistant later noticed that the patient’s fingernail beds appeared blue. The staff was unable to get the patient’s blood pressure or pulse and performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

They called 911 shortly before 2 p.m. The woman was taken to Anne Arundel Medical Center in Parole, where she was pronounced dead by 2:57 p.m.

In August 2007, the woman’s estate filed a complaint with the board claiming that Ferrer failed to properly administer pain medication and didn’t monitor her respiration and ventilation correctly.

The Board of Physicians referred it to a peer review organization to investigate, which resulted in a complaint issued on April 7.

The investigation found that Ferrer failed to meet standards of quality medical care by not properly administering anesthesia, failing to provide intra- and post-operative anesthesia monitoring, and failing to provide adequate resuscitative efforts.

Members of the anti-abortion group said this case shows the need for more scrutiny of facilities like the Gynecare Center.

“I hope one day these same (state) officials have to look this innocent young man in the eye and explain how they decided that veterinary clinics deserved more oversight and regulation than the facility that killed his mother,” Jack Ames, director of Defend Life, said in a statement.


After the botched abortion on Suzanne Logan, was left severely paralyzed following her abortion at the Hillview Women’s Medical Surgical abortion clinic in Suitland Maryland the clinic’s administrator Barbara Lofton told the Washington Post, in an article entitled, 2 Tragedies Raise Doubts About Suitland Clinic;Abortion Patient, Left Paralyzed, Files Suit:8-13-1990 , “If you provide a certain number [of abortions], no matter how good you are, no matter what the qualifications are, there are sometimes circumstances. There are probably no facilities without some complications.” And in response to accusations that the clinic did not know how to handle an emergency situation-she had this to say, “Obviously, the report from the paramedics was written by a pro-life person. There were many fabrications in the report.”

Did you hear the “CONCERN for women from the National Abortion Federation here? This pro-choice organization is about PROFIT – MONEY- and PROMOTING ABORTION – NOt Patient Safety !

Let’s recap – the 60 Minutes reporter on the case of Suzanne Logan said that, “I wanted to talk to Barbara Lofton about those reports, but Lofton didn’t think there was much to talk about. Initially, neither did any of the abortion rights activists we contacted. As a reporter, I found that many pro-choice leaders knew about problems at Hillview, but didn’t want them publicized. National Abortion Federation head Barbara Radford [sp?] admitted she was just hoping we would go away.

BARBARA RADFORD, Head, National Abortion Federation: Well, I think your first reaction from us was “This is the last thing we need.” We had hoped that it wouldn’t get national publicity because of the political nature of all of this.

The a Black Woman dies in 2006, and the abortionist refers reporters to the National Abortion Federation, of which he is a member, and NAF
Spokeswoman Melissa Fowler said abortion is one of the “safest and most commonly provided medical procedures” and that credit for its safety record can be attributed to the “specialized quality care provided by clinics like Gynecare Center,” where Ferrer had an office.

Fowler tries to persuade us that NAF “values our patients and strive to provide the highest quality care.”

I Maintain, botched abortions, 911 calls, abortion deaths, and abortion injuries ARE NAF’s Highest form of care given their record in Maryland alone !

It is time the legislature tightens regulations here – womens lives hang in the balance !

MORE READING HERE: D.C. Board Rarely Punishes Physicians

Pro-Abortion group NOW ‘incensed’ over anti-abortion executive order

Posted in Abortion, Health Care, National Organization for (Some) Women, Obama with tags , , , , , , , , , on March 21, 2010 by saynsumthn


CNN is reporting: National Organization for Women President Terry O’Neill issued a statement Sunday afternoon slamming President Obama, saying that he had broken his faith with [pro-abortion] women by agreeing to issue an executive order that prohibits federal funding for abortions.

“The National Organization for Women is incensed that President Barack Obama agreed today to issue an executive order designed to appease a handful of anti-choice Democrats who have held up health care reform in an effort to restrict women’s access to abortion. Through this order, the president has announced he will lend the weight of his office and the entire executive branch to the anti-abortion measures included in the Senate bill, which the House is now prepared to pass.

“President Obama campaigned as a pro-choice president, but his actions today suggest that his commitment to reproductive health care is shaky at best. Contrary to language in the draft of the executive order and repeated assertions in the news, the Hyde Amendment is not settled law – it is an illegitimate tack-on to an annual must-pass appropriations bill. NOW has a longstanding objection to Hyde and, in fact, was looking forward to working with this president and Congress to bring an end to these restrictions. We see now that we have our work cut out for us far beyond what we ever anticipated. The message we have received today is that it is acceptable to negotiate health care on the backs of women, and we couldn’t disagree more.”