Archive for the Darwin Category

Darwinism , Eugenics , Racism and Black Genocide

Posted in Abortion, American Birth Control League, American Eugenics Society, Black Genocide, Black Victims, Black Women, Charles Davenport, Darwin, Elaine Riddick, Eugenics, Galton, Maafa21, Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood, Pro-Life, Racism with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 6, 2010 by saynsumthn

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Darwinism , Eugenics , Racism and Black Genocide, posted with vodpod

For a comprehensive look at eugenics and black genocide watch the film- Maafa21

Overpopulation and Darwinian eugenics motivated Discovery gunman who called human babies “Parasites”

Posted in Darwin, Environment, Eugenics, Harrison Brown, Holdren, Margaret Sanger, Peter Singer, Planned Parenthood, Sterilization, terrorism with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 2, 2010 by saynsumthn

Discovery Channel hostage crisis ends with gunman’s death
September 2, 2010

James J. Lee, who was protesting what he said was the network’s promotion of overpopulation, was fatally shot by police after taking three people captive at the company headquarters in Maryland.

Silver Spring, Md.: Police shot and killed a gunman after he took three people hostage Wednesday afternoon at the Discovery Channel’s headquarters here, officials said.

A law enforcement official speaking on condition of anonymity because the investigation was ongoing said authorities had identified James J. Lee as the likely suspect.

Lee, 43, who was upset with the channel over its programming, entered the building about 1 p.m., wielding a gun and wearing “explosive devices,” and took a security guard and two other employees hostage, police said. The rest of the company’s nearly 1,900 employees were evacuated from the building.

After several hours of telephone negotiations, Lee pulled out his gun and pointed it at one of the hostages, police said. Tactical officers then took aim at Lee, killing him. It was unclear whether Lee had been able to fire his gun, but all three hostages were able to escape safely, according to officials.

“I know that he had some history with folks at Discovery Channel,” Montgomery County Police Chief J. Thomas Manger said at a news conference after the shooting.

According to electronic court records, Lee was charged with disorderly conduct in 2008 and served 46 days in jail for a protest he staged in front of the channel’s headquarters. He said he was protesting that Discovery’s programming had little to do with saving the planet.

“He didn’t think we were environmentally sound,” said David Leavy, a spokesman for Discovery Communications, adding, “there had not been any communication from him in the last couple of years.”

A lengthy posting that could be seen Wednesday on a website registered to Lee expressed anger against the Discovery Channel and said it promoted overpopulation, according to a report from the Associated Press.

He said the network and its affiliates should stop “encouraging the birth of any more parasitic human infants.” Instead, he said, it should air “programs encouraging human sterilization and infertility.”

“NO MORE BABIES! Population growth is a real crisis,” he wrote.

“I want Discovery Communications to broadcast on their channels to the world their new program lineup and I want proof they are doing so,” he wrote. “I want the new shows started by asking the public for inventive solution ideas to save the planet and the remaining wildlife on it.”

Discovery Health and TLC, both owned by Discovery Communications, spearheaded America’s fascination with prodigious families.

TLC is perhaps the most recognizable in the large-family genre of reality television with its one-time flagship series “Jon & Kate Plus 8,” which at its peak garnered 10 million viewers. Its spin-off, “Kate Plus 8,” premiered with 3.4 million viewers in June.

TLC’s other bountiful brood includes The Duggar family in “19 Kids and Counting.” The network has also aired “Table for 12,” and “Kids by the Dozen,” which featured a number of families with 13 to 16 children each.

Lee posted a manifesto at, but his re-purposing of the web page he’d owned since 2008 was only the latest step in Lee’s on-and offline crusade to draw attention to his cause and gain notice from the Discovery Channel. Posts with his email address and name can be found online dating back to 2006.

Lee’s original website was An archived version of the page shows he was in San Diego in early December, 2006. Using the contact email “,” Lee posted a notice dated December 11 that year stating he would be “meeting at Border’s Bookstore Downtown San Diego Gaslamp area” with “prospective people who want to do something.” He described “World Guardian Voices” as “a movement designed to educate the masses on the impending cultural collapse from overpopulation, global warming, animal extinction, pollution, and exploitation.” As with his manifesto discovered today, Lee made it clear in 2006 that his efforts were inspired by the works of Daniel Quinn, an author popular among environmentalists and anarchists. There was no mention of Discovery or any of its historically affiliated networks on Lee’s old site. Lee made no mention of the science-themed cable network 11 days later, when he made a pair of mysterious posts in a group forum on Lee wrote:

I believe that it is totally possible to save the world. Not because I am a delusional maniac high on something, but because I had a practical idea on how to do it. A vision you might say, a solid idea that was very possible. The idea is not so unusual that it could not fail. I believe that there is a possibility that it could fail, like anything else.

BUT, I believe it so strongly in this idea that I am willing to put all my retirement money on it and risk ending up living on the streets like a hobo begging for handouts.

I can’t tell anyone all the specifics about my idea, because we are in competition with other environmental groups that mean well, but serve the needs of the River. If I tell you exactly what it is, the idea could be lost forever and I’ll just go off into retirement while I watch the world consume itself, so don’t ask me to be too specific about my idea.

Lee later wrote what appears to have been a response to a question since deleted from the thread. His second post was guarded, ending with, “If the idea matures to a successful execution I will call you and tell you the complete idea, because at that point you will need to know. At that point you can refuse. You can refuse at any point and quit at any time. You are under no obligation to continue even once you have started. It will roll on it’s own after that.” He then added his his “misterfifteen” hotmail address.

His Manifesto is loaded with demands to the Discovery Channel, it is Lee writes:
The Discovery Channel MUST broadcast to the world their commitment to save the planet and to do the following IMMEDIATELY:
1. The Discovery Channel and it’s affiliate channels MUST have daily television programs at prime time slots based on Daniel Quinn’s
“My Ishmael” pages 207-212 where solutions to save the planet would be done in the same way as the Industrial Revolution was done,
by people building on each other’s inventive ideas. Focus must be given on how people can live WITHOUT giving birth to more filthy
human children since those new additions continue pollution and are pollution.
A game show format contest would be in order.
Perhaps also forums of leading scientists who understand and agree with the Malthus-Darwin science and the problem of human
Do both. Do all until something WORKS and the natural world starts improving and human civilization building STOPS

2. All programs on Discovery Health-TLC must stop encouraging the birth of any more parasitic human infants and the false heroics behind those actions. In those programs’ places, programs encouraging human sterilization and infertility must be pushed. All former pro-birth programs must now push in the direction of stopping human birth, not encouraging it.

7. Develop shows that mention the Malthusian sciences about how food production leads to the overpopulation of the Human race. Talk about Evolution. Talk about Malthus and Darwin until it sinks into the stupid people’s brains until they get it!!

8. Saving the Planet means saving what’s left of the non-human Wildlife by decreasing the Human population. That means stopping the human race from breeding any more disgusting human babies! You’re the media, you can reach enough people. It’s you resposibility because you reach so many minds!

0. Stop all shows glorifying human birthing on all your channels and on TLC. ..

For every human born, ACRES of wildlife forests must be turned into farmland in order to feed that new addition over the course of 60 to 100 YEARS of that new human’s lifespan! THIS IS AT THE EXPENSE OF THE FOREST CREATURES!!!! All human procreation and farming must cease! It is the responsiblity of everyone to preserve the planet they live on by not breeding any more children who will continue their filthy practices.

Children represent FUTURE catastrophic pollution whereas their parents are current pollution. NO MORE BABIES!

Population growth is a real crisis. Even one child born in the US will use 30 to a thousand times more resources than a Third World child. It’s like a couple are having 30 babies even though it’s just one! If the US goes in this direction maybe other countries will too.

The humans? The planet does not need humans.

Now where have we heard that before???? Babies as Parasites??? No more humans – how about the abortion/population control crowd, starting with Darwin and moving to Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger, Paul Ehrlich, John Holdren, and Peter Singer to name just a few.

For some interesting history about Darwin, Eugenics and how that mentality is being used for population control today- watch Maafa21 (clip below)


Eugenics Professor Peter Singer : Allow Infant Euthanasia ? Just kill them humanely

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Eugenics Professor Peter Singer : Allow Infant …, posted with vodpod

In the 1970s, author of the Bible on population control the Population Bomb” and known as the leading theoretician of animal rights, Peter Singer, Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University and Philosophy coined the term “speciesism” for anyone so narrow-minded as to, “allow the interest of his species to override the greater interest of members of other species“. Singer holds that the right to physical integrity is grounded in a being’s ability to suffer, and the right to life is grounded in the ability to plan and anticipate one’s future. Since the unborn, infants, and severely disabled people lack the ability to plan and anticipate their future, he states that abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia can be justified in certain special circumstances, for instance in the case of severely disabled infants whose life would cause suffering both to themselves and to their parents.

In a question posed to Singer, it was asked:
If you had to save either a human being or a mouse from a fire, with no time to save them both, wouldn’t you save the human being?”

Singer’s answer, ” Yes, in almost all cases I would save the human being. But not because the human being is human, that is, a member of the species Homo sapiens. Species membership alone isn’t morally significant, but equal consideration for similar interests allows different consideration for different interests. The qualities that are ethically significant are, firstly, a capacity to experience something — that is, a capacity to feel pain, or to have any kind of feelings. That’s really basic, and it’s something that a mouse shares with us. But when it comes to a question of taking life, or allowing life to end, it matters whether a being is the kind of being who can see that he or she actually has a life — that is, can see that he or she is the same being who exists now, who existed in the past, and who will exist in the future. Such a being has more to lose than a being incapable of understand this. Any normal human being past infancy will have such a sense of existing over time. I’m not sure that mice do, and if they do, their time frame is probably much more limited. So normally, the death of a human being is a greater loss to the human than the death of a mouse is to the mouse – for the human, it cuts off plans for the distant future, for example, but not in the case of the mouse. And we can add to that the greater extent of grief and distress that, in most cases, the family of the human being will experience, as compared with the family of the mouse (although we should not forget that animals, especially mammals and birds, can have close ties to their offspring and mates). That’s why, in general, it would be right to save the human, and not the mouse, from the burning building, if one could not save both. But this depends on the qualities and characteristics that the human being has. If, for example, the human being had suffered brain damage so severe as to be in an irreversible state of unconsciousness, then it might not be better to save the human

Singer states here that, ” The difference between killing disabled and normal infants lies not in any supposed right to life that the latter has and the former lacks, but in other considerations about killing. Most obviously there is the difference that often exists in the attitudes of the parents. The birth of a child is usually a happy event for the parents. They have, nowadays, often planned for the child. The mother has carried it for nine months. From birth, a natural affection begins to bind the parents to it. So one important reason why it is normally a terrible thing to kill an infant is the effect the killing will have on its parents.

It is different when the infant is born with a serious disability. Birth abnormalities vary, of course. Some are trivial and have little effect on the child or its parents; but others turn the normally joyful event of birth into a threat to the happiness of the parents, and any other children they may have.

Parents may, with good reason, regret that a disabled child was ever born. In that event the effect that the death of the child will have on its parents can be a reason for, rather than against killing it.

When asked the question: Would you kill a disabled baby?

Singer Replied, “Yes, if that was in the best interests of the baby and of the family as a whole. Many people find this shocking, yet they support a woman’s right to have an abortion. One point on which I agree with opponents of abortion is that, from the point of view of ethics rather than the law, there is no sharp distinction between the fetus and the newborn baby.

In a blog post for the New York Times entitled “Should this be the last generation?” Singer discusses South African philosopher David Benatar who said we should have humans sterilized . Singer calls Benator the “author of a fine book with an arresting title: ‘Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence.’”

“To bring into existence someone who will suffer is, Benatar argues, to harm that person, but to bring into existence someone who will have a good life is not to benefit him or her,” explains Singer.


In the 1970’s President Obama’s Science Czar, Paul Holdren, published many books, several which were co-authored with radical population control guru, Paul Ehrlich.

Paul Holdren, President Obama’s Science Czar praised his mentor, Harrison Brown, who wrote the book: The Challenge of Man’s Future.

Challenge of Mans Future by Harrison Brown

Challenge of Mans Future by Harrison Brown

In a speech he delivered as President of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Holdren admitted that he admired Brown and read his book in high school. Holdren also admitted in his speech that he later worked with Harrison Brown at Caltech.

Holdren quoted Brown as saying this during that same speech, “It is clear that the future course of history will be determined by the rates at which people breed and die, by the rapidity with which nonrenewable resources are consumed, by the extent and speed with which agricultural production can be improved, by the rate at which the under-developed areas can industrialize, by the rapidity with which we are able to develop new resources, as well as by the extent to which we succeed in avoiding future wars. All of these factors are interlocked.

In this Clip from the TV program 21st Century (Walter Cronkite) Harrison Brown, who raises questions about whether eugenics is as “common sense” . Interestingly enough, Harrison Brown and James Bonner co-wrote a book together in 1957 titled, The Next Hundred Years.

What are the outstanding virtues we should attempt to breed in to our population? You might say intelligence, but what kind of intelligence? You might say attractiveness, but what kind of attractiveness?

The episode, “The Mystery of Life,” can be found in its entirety on the A/V Geeks DVD, Twenty-First Century.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about "21st Century Mystery of Life ", posted with vodpod

Holdren asked this question in an article authored by him, which was published in a book entitled, No Growth Society,

Why, then, should we compound our plight by permitting population growth to continue?” He stated clearly that in the 1970’s the US had already exceeded its “optimum population size of 210 million” (pg. 41) and concluded that , ” it should be obvious that the optimum rate of population growth is zero or negative…“

Paul Holdren and Harrison Brown slide

Paul Holdren and Harrison Brown slide

What is also interesting is that I obtained a copy of Harrison Brown’s book, The Challenge of Man’s Future, the one our Science Czar holds up as so important, and discovered this Nazi style statement by Brown on page 87 . ” In the absence of restraint abortion, sterilization, coitus interruptus, or artificial fertility control, the resultant high birth rate would have to be matched at equilibrium by an equally high death rate. A major contribution to the high death rate could be infanticide, as has been the situation in cultures of the past. ”

Here are some of the “ideas” John Holdren published in his book Ecoscience:

Where do people like Lee get their “Humans as Parasites” ideas???? Perhaps it is from Planned Parenthood’s founder- Margaret Sanger:

Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger, was a member in good standing with the racist American Eugenics Society. Sanger had boards members who were known for their racist writing and Sanger published many of those in her publications. Sanger called for parents to have a QUOTE: LICENSE TO BREED controlled by people who believed in her eugenic philosophy. She wanted all would be parents to go before her eugenic boards to request a “PERMIT TO BREED“. So much for Choice , huh?

Sanger also called for those who were poor and what she considered to be “morons and immoral‘ , to be shipped to colonies where they would live in “Farms and Open Spaces” dedicated to brainwashing these so-called “inferior types” into having what Sanger called, “Better moral conduct”.

I consider that the world and almost our civilization for the next twenty-five years, is going to depend upon a simple, cheap, safe contraceptive to be used in poverty stricken slums, jungles, and among the most ignorant people. Even this will not be sufficient, because I believe that now, immediately, there should be national sterilization for certain dysgenic types of our population who are being encouraged to breed and would die out were the government not feeding them.
Planned Parenthood Founder, Margaret Sanger, 1950

Maybe from videos like this on YouTube:

University of Texas Biologist Eric Pianka -Population Control: Professor “HIV would be too slow!”

Interview on Generations Radio: Is America’s Shameful Experiment with Eugenics Over Yet?

Posted in Abortion, Darwin, Elaine Riddick, Elite, Eugenics, Galton, Germany, Kenya, Life Dynamics, Maafa21, Margaret Sanger, North Carolina Eugenics, Planned Parenthood, Racism, Samuel Yette, Sterilization with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on August 5, 2010 by saynsumthn

Generations with Vision with Kevin Swanson Interview 8-5-2010

Maafa21 Black Genocide in 21st Century America
Is America’s Shameful Experiment with Eugenics Over Yet?

Maafa21 interview on Generations Radio

What could be classified the most controversial and shocking expose of the American “family planning” industry and eugenics movement is the subject of a new documentary produced by Life Dynamics. Trace the roots of the modern abortion and family planning industries, and you will find a huge network of eugenics organizations, powerful foundations, elitists committed to racism, direct connections with Nazi Germany, and of course, Margaret Sanger. We summarize the 2 1/2 hour documentary in this riveting interview with Producer Mark Crutcher, President of Life Dynamics.

Darwin’s Favored Races: DVD release of Creation (the Movie) a Hollywood spin of the racist and eugenic side of Darwin

Posted in Darwin with tags , , , , , , , , on June 28, 2010 by saynsumthn

Lest we forget the full title of The Origin of The Species:

For more on how Darwin affected Eugenics and Modern day Black Genocide watch: Maafa21

Freedoms Journal ( African American) Magazine exposes Black Genocide

Posted in Abortion, Anti-abortion, birth control, Black Conservative, Black Genocide, Black History Month, Black Victims, Civil Rights, Clenard Childress, Constitution, Darwin, Eugenics, Jesse Jackson, Life Dynamics, Maafa21, Margaret Sanger, Mark Crutcher, NAACP, Pastor Stephen Broden, Planned Parenthood, Population Control, pro-choice, Pro-Life, Racism with tags , , , , , , , , on January 22, 2010 by saynsumthn

From the The Founder/Publisher of Freedoms Journal Magazine Dr. Eric Wallace

With the prospect for such promise clearly before us in this new year, it may seem strange, to some, to ask how 200 years of slavery has resulted in modern-day genocide. Still, sadly the number one cause of death for people of African-American descent—is Abortion. Alarmingly, the abortion rate for African American women is significantly higher than that of whites, or all other ethic communities in the United States, according to current statistics from the Centers for Disease Control. In fact, more African-Americans (13 million) have perished at the hands of abortionists and their allies than have died from the seven leading causes of death combined since 1973—the year Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision legalized abortion in the United States.

I want to make you aware of a nationally distributed on-line digital publication, which aims to reconnect the African-American community to its conservative political roots. Freedom’s Journal Magazine, following in the tradition of the first African-American newspaper of the same name first distributed in 1827, is the premier forum for conservative Black voices on political reform in our nation. The Founder/Publisher, Dr. Eric Wallace of Chicago-based Wallace Multimedia Group, is committed to the cause of revitalizing conservative (L.I.F.T) principles, freedoms and a judicious political process, which reflect the traditions, values, and issues of our nation’s African American constituency. Through timely, insightful and educational news and commentary that promotes a biblical-worldview; FJM is uniquely positioned to not only elevate the profiles and opinions of leading black conservatives, but more importantly incite those within the Black community to action on behalf of conservative values.

Recently when asked his opinion of this highly charged topic, Dr. Wallace responded, “While abortion still largely remains a voluntary choice, abortion providers, like Planned Parenthood, and many Black leaders continue to convince would-be mothers in the African-American community to unwittingly support wide-scale destruction of their unborn—under the guise of rising out of poverty”.

Subsequently, this special edition of Freedom’s Journal Magazine (Issue 1, 2010), available on-line now, focuses on the racist underpinnings of abortion, the illegal activities of the abortion industry, and the devastating impact of abortion on the African-American community. Titled Maafa 21: Exposing Black Genocide in the 21st Century, this issue includes, an article, which explores abortion’s economic impact on the African American community; an interview with the creator of the explosive documentary film Maafa 21; facts concerning the truth behind school-based clinics that promote promiscuity, and the racist history of the Eugenics movement and Planned Parenthood’s Negro Project. Additionally, FJM contributors provide relevant insight and commentary on how and why the African-American community must fight back against the demoralizing form of “legalized” genocide, which is rapidly destroying its community.

I invite you to click here, to preview this issue of Freedom’s Journal Magazine. Once you’ve experienced the value of this resource; please consider lending your support by making as many family, friends and associates aware, as possible. Now is the time for us to “stand for what we say we believe, and actively engage in the political process that represents us“.

P.S.: Please see page 2 for the “limited offer” with subscription.

Maafa21 Preview (Below)

African American Pastor Stephen Broden, Darwin atheists deliberate attempt to change this country

Posted in Abortion, birth control, birth control in water, Black Conservative, Black Genocide, Black History Month, Black Pastor, Darwin, Eugenics, forced abortion, Forced Sterilization, Glenn Beck, Health Care, Maafa21, Margaret Sanger, New World Order, Obama, Pastor Stephen Broden, Planned Parenthood, Population Control, pro-choice, Pro-Life, Racism, Sterilization, Sterilizing agents in Drinking Water, Sterilizing agents in water with tags , , , , , , , , on January 11, 2010 by saynsumthn

Here is the film: Maafa21 mentioned above- to order: Maafa21 Black Genocide in 21st Century Americaclick here

“Maafa 21” Exposes Black Genocide

Posted in Abortion, American Birth Control League, American Eugenics Society, Anti-abortion, Bill Gates, birth control, birth control in water, Black Crime, Black Genocide, Black History Month, Black Panthers, Black Victims, Brian Clowes, Charles Davenport, Church, Civil Rights, Clenard Childress, Cold Spring Harbor, compulsory birth control, Connie Eller, Constitution, Darwin, Davenport, Dictatorships, Ehrlich, Elaine Riddick, Eugenics, Evolution, forced abortion, Forced Sterilization, Frederick OSborn, Galton, Garrett Hardin, Guttmacher, Hilda Cornish, Hitler, Jesse Jackson, Joyce Tarnow, Life Dynamics, Lothrop Stoddard, Maafa21, Margaret Sanger, Mark Crutcher, NAACP, Nazi, New World Order, Pastor Stephen Broden, Pelosi, Planned Parenthood, Population Control, pro-choice, Pro-Life, Racism, Religious Coalition of Reproductive Choice, Richard Nixon, Rockefeller, Roosevelt, RU-486, Samuel Yette, Slavery, Sterilization, Sterilizing agents in Drinking Water, Sterilizing agents in water, Supreme Court, William Bouie Haden, William Shockley with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on January 8, 2010 by saynsumthn

Written by Rebecca Terrell Published in The New American
Thursday, 07 January 2010 19:00

The documentary Maafa 21: Black Genocide in 21st Century America is an explosive exposé of the racist eugenics agenda of the abortion industry in the United States. It makes the case that, though abortionists claim to advocate privacy, women’s rights, and reproductive choice, their true motive is racial genocide and ethnic cleansing.

Even more alarmingly, the film maintains that this agenda began not with the birth of Planned Parenthood in the early 1900s but more than 150 years ago before slavery as an institution in America came to an end. Literature for the documentary reads, “It’s about elitism, secret agendas, treachery and corruption at the highest levels of political and corporate America.”

Producer Mark Crutcher of Life Dynamics, a pro-life organization, explained the title Maafa 21 in an August interview on LIB Radio. During research for the film, he found the Swahili word maafa, which literally means “great disaster” or “tragedy.” It is used to define the time of African enslavement in America. “The crucial issue is the maafa may have begun when the first African was shackled in the bottom of a slave ship,” explained Crutcher, “but it did not end with slavery. It continues to this very moment.” He said the number “21” in the title refers to the fact that the abortion industry perpetuates maafa into the 21st century.

Crutcher offered several statistics to support his claim. He pointed out that even though African-American women make up only 12 percent of the population, they account for 37 percent of women who have abortions. He also said a black child in the United States is five times as likely to be aborted as a white child. He maintains that more African-American children die in abortion mills in less than four days than the number of African-Americans killied by Ku Klux Klan in 150 years, or the number of black soldiers killed in seven years of the Vietnam War. “The most dangerous place for a black child in the U.S. is his mother’s womb,” Crutcher asserts.

This did not happen by accident, according to Crutcher, and he produced Maafa 21 to lay out his case in a chronological timeline describing the evolution of black eugenics in this country.

The documentary begins in the mid-1800s with Francis Galton, the British statistician who coined the word “eugenics,” or “selective breeding as proposed human improvement.” From there, Maafa 21 weaves a chilling tale of the efforts of racists in the United States to eliminate African-Americans from the population. Hitler credited them with influencing his European agenda. Through the 20th century these influential bigots planned tactics such as injecting a sterilizing agent into public water supplies. The documentary explains how their racist efforts continue to the present day and provides a legitimate explanation of the relatively unchanged size of the black population as compared with other races in the United States.

Obviously guilty parties, such as Planned Parenthood, are highlighted in the film, but Crutcher does not shrink from pointing the finger of blame at less expected perpetrators. Maafa 21 exposes support of the abortion industry and the eugenics movement from both Democrat and Republican sources, including a disturbing recording in which Richard Nixon expresses racial prejudice and his approval of black eugenics through abortion.

Crutcher said Maafa 21 began as a single chapter in a book he was writing about abortion. As he dug deeper into researching eugenics, he realized it was a much more comprehensive subject than could be covered in one chapter of his book. The result is this two-hour documentary, a professionally produced and convincingly related narrative told in a succession of interviews and quotes from the actual perpetrators of this double-holocaust of abortion and eugenics.

See the preview for Maafa21 Black Genocide in 21st Century America here ( Below)