Archive for the After Birth Abortion Category

Woman arrested after she commits after birth abortion

Posted in After Birth Abortion, Post-Natal abortion with tags , , , , , , , , , , on May 21, 2015 by saynsumthn

A Michigan District Court judge has charged a woman with felony murder, premeditated murder and first-degree child abuse, according to the Redford Township Police Department, after she delivered a baby and heartlessly put the baby in a bag to suffocate.

Baby desk2

    25 year-old Kimberly Pappas is accused of delivering her baby at work, wrapping him up in a bag and sticking him in a desk drawer, suffocating the newborn.

    According to WDIV TV

    Investigators said she gave birth to a baby boy in the toilet, pulled him out to cut the umbilical cord, then wrapped him in a bag and hid him in her desk at work along with the placenta.

    The woman told responding paramedics she had a miscarriage.

    But rescue crews said the baby was still warm when they found him. The medical examiner said the baby died of asphyxiation.

    Pappas faces first-degree murder and first-degree child abuse charges. Her attorney said she was scared to have the baby which led to the incident.

    She is being held without bond.

I call this an after birth abortion or post birth abortion, what do you call it?

FOR CLARIFICATION: Yes, the story is about a woman who killed her baby at delivery. It is titled after birth abortion because the baby was killed after the mother delivered it. How is that different than killing a baby before she delivers it? I see no difference. Prebirth or After-bith abortion is the same” MURDER of a baby ! Think about that.

Post-birth Abortion: Students Sign Petition To Kill Newborns Up To 5yrs Old

Posted in After Birth Abortion, Dreaded Complication with tags , , , , on November 4, 2014 by saynsumthn

Abortion advocate approves of taking life of born children

Posted in After Birth Abortion, Created Equal with tags , , , , , on September 29, 2014 by saynsumthn

The pro-life group, Created Equal, has taken to the streets and engaged an abortion advocate who claims that it should not be illegal to murder a born child.

After Birth Abortion 2

“You’re asking me whether I blanketly believe it’s wrong to kill a newborn baby after that baby’s been taken from it’s mother’s womb,” the pro-choicer tells Created Equal’s outreach team at Ohio State University.

She continues, “And I’m saying to you I have no idea what medical necessities or medical issues would arise that would necessitate that.”

Asked where she will draw the line on abortion she appears to have no line even when Created Equal asks if the line should be drawn minutes after the baby is born.

After Birth Abortion

Her response is shocking, “It would depend on the medical circumstances, I don’t think anybody can answer those questions,” she states.

The Created Equal spokesperson than reiterates, two minutes after birth?

The pro-choice woman shakes her head in agreement and says, “I don’t know what kind of medical emergency could arise in those two minutes, I’m not a doctor….”

WOW- so, not being a doctor you cannot state that killing a born child is wrong? Shocking !!!

Again she is asked what medical emergency could arise for a born child to be killed.

Her answer, “I don’t know…I have no idea what medical necessities would arise that would necessitate that. So I can’t make a blanket statement that I would call it murder and everything case. I’m not in the operating room I have no idea….

The abortion culture is leading to the promotion of infanticide and euthanasia because it diminishes the truth that you have no right to end a life once it has begun.

Watch Created Equal’s interview below !

The Dreaded Complication – Babies Born Alive From Abortion

Posted in After Birth Abortion, Dreaded Complication, Late term abortion, Uncategorized with tags , , , , on August 29, 2014 by saynsumthn

Dreaded COmplicationExerpt DC

Gosnell Babies Born Alive

I suppose the abortion blog has never heard of Texas abortionist Douglas Karpen and what his former employees accuse him of doing:

“We seen a lot of cases where women, they felt like they had to push and they had to run to the bathroom. On some occasions we had women that were the fetus were falling into the toilet.. We had one incident where it was big news, where the fetus was left in the toilet, I don’t know if you all heard about that one she was at McDonalds. They stopped there in the morning and the fetus was left in the toilet and nobody ever found out whose fetus it was, but it was one of his patients. We knew it because we were watching it on the news that day that she was supposed to be in the clinic.”

“He was trying to pull out the fetus…and he pulled her cervix out thinking it was the arm or something…he pulled it out, he ripped it apart..he had said, she probably won’t be able to have kids any more after this. ” “And he didn’t want to tell her because it was a Spanish speaking lady…she didn’t need to know what was going on with herself.” They said it was the staff not the abortionist who told the woman to go to the hospital after the abortion.

“He would leave a patient on the table, 45 minutes with her legs open and a speculum inside her cervix as he went across to his office and had his sandwich.”

KARPEN PHOTO 2-942f39ee34

How to obtain a copy of this DVD http://tinyurl.com/lag2udc

More: http://tinyurl.com/k72hvrx and http://tinyurl.com/myzar4m

_____________________________

PlannedParenthoodLM Logo Vert PP Primary Blue - 250px

Or when Planned Parenthood’s lobbyist hesitated on what the abortion giant would do with a botched abortion where a baby is born alive:

______________________________________________________________

Exerpt DC

Gosnell is no anomaly? “(Live births) are little known because organized medicine, from fear of public clamor and legal action, treats them more as an embarrassment to be hushed up than a problem to be solved. It’s like turning yourself in to the IRS for an audit.” Cates said. “What is there to gain? The tendency is not to report because there are only negative incentives.”~ Willard Cates, M.D., former head of the Centers for Disease Control of the U.S. Public Health Service as quoted in “Abortion: The Dreaded Complication” ; Philadelphia Inquirer, Aug. 2, 1981

__________________________________________________________

Baby Special

Gosnell no anomaly? Babies survive abortions. This child’s abortion began at South Florida abortion clinic in 1989. There were complications which caused the women to be transferred to a Hospital. Police received an anonymous call that the baby survived an abortion but was not treated. A nurse in the room during the abortion claims the baby was moving when it came out and the doctor just wrapped in some linens. The Medical Examiner testified the autopsy found pockets of air in the baby’s stomach and that the child breathed. “When a fetus is aborted, sometimes there is some activity in the fetus and you normally don’t do anything. You let the fetus expire. The usual thing is just to take your time, don’t immediately do anything,” the abortionist told authorities. Authorities cleared the doctor saying there was no clear evidence the abortionist smothered the baby. Pro-lifers felt authorities never took eye witness testimony into account. Baby Special was 23 1/2 weeks gestation.
______________________________________________________________

hayat4

NY Abortionist Abu Hayat ripped the arm off a 32-week unborn child during an abortion. The girl was born alive. This is Ana Rosa Rodriguez.
Ana Rosa

An East Village doctor was convicted of performing an illegal third-trimester abortion in which he severed the arm of a fetus. The doctor was the first person convicted of conducting an illegal abortion in New York State in more than a decade.

hayat2

In Feb of 1993, after four and a half days of deliberation, a jury in State Supreme Court in Manhattan found Dr. Abu Hayat guilty of assault on Rosa Rodriguez and her baby, Ana Rosa. He was also convicted of two counts of assault on another patient.

Jury members, who refused to comment on their verdict, appeared to have difficulty deciding whether Dr. Hayat knew Ms. Rodriguez was beyond the legal 24-week limit for an abortion. They also repeatedly asked for explanations of a complex array of assault charges, each with a different basis in law. ‘He’s Just Shocked’

Ximena, a baby aborted, survives, left to die

Source: British Columbia Report Magazine,Did someone try to murder Ximena?8-30-1999

Ximena Renaerts was born unexpectedly after a botched abortion, was abandoned by medical staff at Vancouver General Hospital and left to die in a room used to store dead fetuses. Although shivering, whimpering and gasping for air, the baby was forced to fend for herself for 40 minutes until a nurse finally came to her aid. But it was too late to save the child from serious injury. Her adoptive mother, Margaret Renaerts sued the girl’s natural parents, a hospital and seven of its staff, an unnamed abortion clinic, the provincial government and two of its officials.The case alleges that, Ximena’s natural mother, Nadine Bourne, then 22, had been admitted to Vancouver General on after suffering complications from after a botched clinic abortion at a Bellingham, Wash., clinic three days earlier. She was scheduled for a ”dilation and curettage” the next morning to remove what remained in her womb, but gave birth at 3 a.m. to Ximena in a bedpan who was 26 weeks old and weighed less than a kilogram.

Despite the baby crying and gasping for air, a nurse left her to die in a room used to store dead fetuses. The hospital’s supervising nurse came on the scene 40 minutes later and ordered a Code Blue — an emergency resuscitation of the baby.

The baby, suffered permanent brain damage. Her adoptive parents won the lawsuit which, will help pay for her care.

Canadian Business and Current Affairs Western Report,Rightly warned they could have killed him: a Winnipeg couple’s “wrongful birth” claim says their handicapped son should be dead (Jane & Robert Sanders case):9-26-1994/The Vancouver Sun ,Family gets $8.7 million in VGH abortion case:7-31-1999

_________________________________________________

24 week abortions, possibility the fetus may live

Source: NY Times, When abortion becomes birth: 2-15-1984
Dr. Hugh R. Barber, chief of obstetrics and gynecology at Lenox Hill Hospital in Manhattan, where abortions are performed until the legal limit of 24 weeks told the newspaper this,

”We have to warn the families. You have to tell them there is a slight possibility the fetus may live.”

__________________________________________________________________________________________

Aborted baby fell out of me and into the toilet.

Source: Abortion TV; Letter from those who’ve had abortions
One abortion patient shared, “The volunteers ran to call the nurses and they told me to hurry to the toilet, and I did. I sat down, forgetting to put the measuring cup on the toilet, and the baby fell out – the baby fell right out of me and into the toilet. One of the nurses got mad at me and told me to go to lay down.”

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Patient delivered an aborted fetus in the toilet

Source: National Review :Back to the alley; Clinical Psychosis;Unsafe abortions are not a thing of the past, 11-23-1998
The affidavit of “Employee B,” a certified surgical technician employed at Midtown Hospital (abortion clinic) for a month and a half before resigning, describes Midtown’s patient care:

“On April 18, 1998, at approximately 7:00 a.m.I witnessed a patient deliver an intact fetus in the toilet of a bathroom in the waiting room area. After expelling the baby and the afterbirth, the patient walked to the operating room because there were no wheelchairs. I opened the fetal sac so that the fetus could be weighed. The weight was approximately 3029 grams [over 6 pounds, 10 ounces]. It was a very big fetus. My impression is that at Midtown Hospital a procedure will be done at any gestational age as long as the patient has the money.”

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

A baby came out in the toilet and I held it.

Source: Transcript of a phone call pro-lifers received from a girl who aborted at a Florida abortion clinic
Transcript of a phone call pro-lifers received from a girl who aborted at a Florida abortion clinic:

“Hi, I had a procedure done there (at Aware Woman abortion clinic) in January and I just think that while you are protesting you should just maybe tell the people what happened to me. I had an abortion in January of this year and two days later . . . they didn’t give me an abortion.

A baby came out in the toilet and I held it in my hand.

I tried to get counseling and things like that. You know all the therapist does is just want to dig up things that have happened in your life. She never wants to hit the issue that you want to talk about.

Well, I’m just calling . . . I mean you can tell the girls that, you know, if this is something they want to do, then don’t go there (Aware Woman).

I tried to seek legal advice and pretty much Aware Woman has covered their butt. You know they are not going to let anything happen to them.

So, my intentions are only just to tell these girls that they might go in and pay $480.00 and their termination might be what happens. They don’t know what might happen 2 or 3 days later. Maybe they may have a chance that nothing would happen to them. Their baby might come out like mine did — whole. It wasn’t torn, it wasn’t anything. I was 13 weeks and I held it in my hand. It fit in the palm of my hand.

I have terrible, terrible problems. I bleed every day. I don’t know if I will ever have children again. I am 22 years old.

Maybe I should have listened to the lady who was trying to talk to me when I went inside. I haven’t talked to anyone else about this so it felt good just to have someone listen and not say anything.”

_______________________________________________________________________

I saw a lot of aborted babies born alive

Source: WorldNet Daily Biohazard bags & buckets: 9-8-2004
Interview of an abortion clinic nurse in Florida with Jill Stanek:

“I saw a lot of babies born alive … Dr. X said that was a side effect of a medication. They always said to leave the baby alone, and they would stop breathing … Two hours was the longest I saw a baby live … One girl was 26-27 weeks … hey put the babies in red biohazard bags when they were still moving … tied the bag up … put them in a biohazard box. The biohazard medical service would pick boxes up Monday and Thursday. Dr..X would insert the medication and send the women home. They were told to come back the next day.
There was one incident where the woman had the baby while she was waiting at the door for the clinic to open. She got there at 7 a.m. The clinic opened at 8 a.m. She said the baby was born alive. The baby was now dead, and she was holding the baby in a bag. She was bleeding.
I was in the room when Dr. X gave the digoxin to stop that baby’s heartbeat beforehand. [Digoxin is a medication inserted by needle through a mother’s abdomen into a baby’s heart to cause instant cardiac arrest.]
Well, he didn’t have an ultrasound machine that day. He inserted the needle blindly. He said he’d been doing it so many years, he knew the location. But he didn’t actually know if he hit the heart.
I know this nurse – Bridget. She was working there when the new doctor held a baby under water in a bucket when she told him the baby was alive. That baby was between 25-26 weeks. Bridget left two months ago because of that.
I left because I got tired of everything going on and the fact Dr. X would coach women into saying they were going to kill themselves if they didn’t abort. Then he said he had a legal right to do it past viability. He did them all the way to 40 weeks.”

__________________________________________________________________

This was a perfectly formed 26-week baby.

Source: WorldNet Daily Biohazard bags & buckets: 9-8-2004
Jill Stanek’s interview with A nurse who works at a hospital in Southern California :

“I, too, witnessed a similar incident during one very long night shift in the emergency room. We were summoned to get a “pregnant woman in distress” out of her car. The first to arrive was a paramedic, who reported hearing a little cry as she approached. She tried to give the baby rescue breaths, but a new infant can’t tolerate more than a couple minutes without oxygen before permanent brain damage occurs, as you know. By the time we got the infant inside, she was already cyanotic [blue] and, with the parents’ urging, the ER doc pronounced her [dead] almost immediately.
The focus turned to stabilizing the mom who was bleeding profusely. I felt so badly for her and tried to comfort. She was quite cold to my attempts, which, of course, raised suspicions.
When mom’s “primary physician” arrived on scene, we all realized what was going on – that it was, in fact, an abortion.”
This was a perfectly formed 26-week baby. Someone laid her on a table. As soon as I saw her I nearly fell apart. The image of that beautiful, fully formed, perfect little infant haunts me to this day. I’ve seen it in my sleep. I’ve seen it every time I see a pregnant woman.”

__________________________________________________________________

Head of aborted baby protruding

Source: Various
In May of 2006, State Health Officials used an “emergency order” to close the Summit Medical (abortion) Center in Birmingham after the clinic was found dispensing RU-486 without a doctor. News reports indicate that a staff member of the abortion clinic gave a patient RU-486, which, is supposed to be administered only by doctors. The patient was told during the examination that she was only six weeks pregnant. Six days later the woman was rushed to the emergency room of the Birmingham hospital with the head of a baby protruding. While at the hospital the woman delivered a stillborn, macerated, six-pound four-ounce baby. The Baby was well beyond the six-week estimate the clinic issued. “It was nearly full term,” said State health officer, Dr. Donald Williamson. Once state health officials were notified, they found that Summit’s records falsely indicated that the clinic’s abortionist performed the ultrasound and provided the abortion. Investigations revealed that the physician listed on the clinic’s files was not even present at the clinic the day the abortion drug was administered.

Montgomery Advisor: Abortion clinic closed: 5-19-2006/ State Board of Health for the State of Alabama: Emergency Order of License of Suspension:5-17-2006/ Birmingham News, Clinic’s closing renews debate, Summit patients dismayed by care received :5-21-2006

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Twice witness a live birth from abortion

Source: Ohio Plain Dealer, Testimony graphic as Dayton trial on abortion ban begins: 1-10-2001
In Testimony before the Ohio legislature regarding partial-birth abortions, an Akron abortionist, Rein Siiner acknowledged that he had twice witnessed fetuses expelled alive during procedures. Siiner told US District Judge Walter Rice, ” we provide care and comfort until they expire.”

_____________________________________________________________________________________

I wrapped the aborted fetus in Kleenex

Source: Canadian Business and Current Affairs , Western Report, Hag-ridden by post-abortion guilt:10-04-1993
One abortion patient wrote:
“…for days after the abortion- I went to the washroom and there was a fetus, and I thoroughly examined it. I held it on a piece of Kleenex. I kept saying to myself, ‘Don’t do that, you are hurting it,’ even though it was dead already. I started thinking that it could have been a person it could have possibly been loved by somebody else who could have taken care of it. I thought as if it was almost still alive. That really shocked me. For about a week I had it wrapped up in that Kleenex and in the cabinet underneath the sink. I couldn’t bring myself to throw it in the garbage or do anything like that. And then every time I came into the washroom I knew it would be in there and I wouldn’t dare open the door of the cabinet. After about a week I worked up enough nerve to take another look at it. But by this time it was all sticking to the Kleenex and I just didn’t want to start tearing it apart. So I ended up putting it in the garbage. It sounds so horrible saying it that way. It really affected me.”

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Saline abortion, baby born alive dies

Source: NY Times, When abortion becomes birth: A dilemna of medical ethics shaken by advances: 2-15-1984
Abortionist E. Wyman Garrett told The New York Times that, ”A woman comes to me for a late abortion and I do it the best way I know how.”

Dr. E. Wyman Garrett is an obstetrician in Newark who is (according to the Times) among a growing number of physicians who have developed expertise in performing D and E’s through the 24th week of pregnancy.

He said he prefers this method because it is safer for the woman and because it

avoids the agonizing decision of what to do when an child is born alive

a situation he confronted only last year.

The artcile stated that in that instance, Dr. Garrett performed a saline abortion on a young woman at University Hospital in Newark. The infant that emerged weighed about 1 pound 10 ounces and was alive. It was born Jan. 13 and died April 29 after developing meningitis.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Resuscitate: some feel comfortable, some don’t

Source: NY Times, When abortion becomes birth: A dilemna of medical ethics shaken by advances: 2-15-1984
In an interview on a New York Times story about late term abortions William Caspe the director of pediatrics at Bronx-Lebanon Hospital asked, ”What are the chances of a 24-week fetus to have a normal life? Probably small. Can they survive in terms of their heart and lungs? Yes. In terms of brain survival we are not there. And so a number of us have great qualms about what to do to a teeny tiny baby. For medical and legal reasons, we need to resuscitate. Some feel comfortable at that. Some don’t. As a society, you shouldn’t want us to do that. But as society, you give us no choice.”

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Fifty babies a year are alive after abortion

Source: The Sunday Times (London), Fifty babies a year are alive after abortion: 11-27-2005
The London Sunday Times reported that , A UK government agency is launching an inquiry into doctors’ reports that up to 50 babies a year are born alive after botched National Health Service abortions.
The investigation, by the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH), comes amid growing unease among clinicians over a legal ambiguity that could see them being charged with infanticide.

The paper reported that the number of UK terminations carried out in the 18th week of pregnancy or later has risen from 5,166 in 1994 to 7,432 last year. Prenatal diagnosis for conditions such as Down’s syndrome is increasing and foetuses with the condition are routinely aborted, even though many might be capable of leading fulfilling lives. In the past decade, doctors’ skill in saving the lives of premature babies has improved radically: at least 70%-80% of babies in their 23rd or 24th week of gestation now survive long-term.

In August clinicians in Manchester published an analysis of 31 such babies born in northwest England between 1996 and 2001.

“If a baby is born alive following a failed abortion and then dies (because of lack of care), you could potentially be charged with murder,” said Shantala Vadeyar, a consultant obstetrician at South Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, who led the study.

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Baby born after 3 abortion attempts

Source: The Sunday Times (London), Fifty babies a year are alive after abortion: 11-27-2005
The London Sunday Times reported that Paul Clarke, a neonatal intensive care specialist in Norwich, treated a boy born at 24 weeks after three failed abortion attempts. The mother decided to keep the child, who is now two years old but is suffering what doctors call “significant ongoing medical problems”.

Clarke said.

“The survival of this child was not recorded in any official statistics. There is nothing at the moment to force abortion practitioners to account for their failures.”

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Abortion doc convicted, drowned aborted girl

Source: The Associated Press,Domestic News:9-29-1983
“If I’m lying, may I die right now,”

Is what abortionist, Raymond Showery told the 12-member district court jury, which included a pregnant woman, before his sentencing in the death of a fetus.

He then burst into tears.

Showery was convicted of drowning a “very alive” 5- to 7-month-old female fetus after an abortion and was sentenced to 15 years in prison for murder.

One witness, former hospital aide Maria Fernandez, testified in the nine-day trial that she watched the abortion on July 28, 1979.

Ms. Fernandez, who was 17 years old at the time, was the only witness to note the fetus’ sex. She testified the fetus was “very alive,” “fat and white,” and weighed about 5 pounds.

Other witnesses estimated the weight at 3 to 6 pounds.Four other former hospital employees testified Showery pulled the fetus, which they said was about 12 inches long, from an unidentified woman during a hysterotomy abortion, similar to a Caesarean section.

Prosecutors said one of Showery’s sons disposed of the 3- to 6-pound fetus _ estimated by nurses at 5 to 7 months old _ after Showery drowned it in a bucket of water and dropped it into a plastic bag.

Dr. Raymond Showery, 55, contended the abortion never took place, despite testimony from hospital workers who said they were there.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

3-pound, 9-ounce baby girl survives abortion

Source: LA Times, The Abortions of Last Resort, 1-7-1990
According to the LA Times, Philadelphia-area obstetrician Joseph L. Melnick was convicted of infanticide for failing to care for a 3-pound, 9-ounce baby girl born alive after he attempted an abortion. The newborn died within an hour of birth. The doctor said he believed his patient, a 13-year-old, was only 18 weeks pregnant. An autopsy showed the gestational age as 32 weeks. Melnick appealed his conviction.

______________________________________________________________________________

Westminster OBGYN charged with murdering infant

Source: LA Times, The Abortions of Last Resort, 1-7-1990
According to the LA Times, In the late 1970s, jurors in Santa Ana deadlocked twice in the case of William B. Waddill, a Westminster obstetrician-gynecologist charged with murdering a 2 1/2-pound infant believed to have been born alive after an abortion attempt. During that sensational trial, the Westminster Community Hospital chief of pediatrics testified that he had seen the physician strangle the apparent abortion survivor — an accusation that Waddill denied. He was freed after the second failure to get a verdict.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Baby born alive after abortion

rowan1b
According to WorldnetDaily, (Abortion staff ignores baby boy born alive? Woman pleads for help with ‘Rowan’ after delivering son in clinic restroom: 4/25/2005), abortion patient, Angele, a single mother in her thirties with two children, thought that abortion was the answer to her circumstances. Angele was 22 weeks pregnant when she scheduled to have the abortion at a Florida abortion clinic. Angele delivered the child alive in a restroom and says her pleading for help from medical staff went unheeded, even when an employee saw that the tiny boy was moving.
According to her attorneys at The Liberty Counsel, the abortion clinic is known for late-term abortions and its well-known founder, abortionist James Pendergraft. Liberty Counsel stated in a press release that a few years ago Pendergraft served time in a federal prison regarding an alleged scheme to extort the city of Ocala, Florida by means of his other abortion clinic in that city.

On April 1, 2005, Angele went to the EPOC abortion clinic and was given Valium. She also received laminaria, which was inserted in her cervix to begin dilation. The purpose of inserting laminaria is to dilate the cervix overnight in preparation for the abortion. She was told to return the following day.

On April 2, Angele was given pills by the abortion clinic to induce violent labor. Angele told Worldnetdaily that she chose the “labor and delivery process” for her abortion “as opposed to partial birth or having to dismember the child to retrieve him from the uterus/birth canal.”

” The injection burned a lot as it went in. … The discomfort was distracting. I still felt the ‘lams’ as they were being inserted. Dr.(Harry) Perper told me to relax my muscles and noted that my cervix was slightly soft. I asked him what that meant and he said it was good, ” said Angele.

Angele says despite having asked Digoxin, she did not receive the digoxin injection, which she surmises caused the baby to be born alive. Digoxin is a drug injected into an unborn baby to cause his or her heart to stop in preparation for what amounts to a stillborn birth. She says she overheard staff talking about “dig-ing” her – injecting the digoxin – but, after taking a sonogram initially and then quickly taking the machine to another room, the staff, she says, failed to return it to her room. A sonogram machine is used to guide the needle into the unborn baby’s heart.

“I wanted it to be as humane and painless as possible for my son,” she said, choking back tears. “They told me they would guide a needle directly into his heart and it would put him to sleep, and he wouldn’t feel anything.”

Abortionist Harry Perper, is the doctor who inserted the laminaria, a man Angele described as “a very fast-moving, hyperactive type of person.”

Angele says that after she took the pills intended to start labor, “I waited outside, cramping and crying, for the clinic to open. My contractions were close. I had been having them for hours. I knocked repeatedly at the door. There was a burgundy truck in the parking lot. Ten to 15 minutes later, Debbie opened the door and let me in.

“I was directed to ‘the room.’ I had been there for a moment the day before and thought it to be a waiting room for family or driving companions. It had a leather sofa and a fabric sofa, both with a white blanket stretched across the seat cushions, a small television and a few magazines.”

However, noted Angele, “It was not a waiting area – it was the ‘delivery room.’ It was, of course, very cold.”

Cramping and crying, Angele was given a blanket that was still wet. She began to bleed and go into labor. Despite her cries, no one assisted her. After one hard push, the baby was born, fully intact and definitely alive. Angele was shocked and astonished to see that her baby boy was moving … he was ALIVE! Angele said, “His right leg moved. He curled up a bit, like he was cold; I screamed but no one came.” She pleaded for the clinic workers to call 911 but they did not.

Angele described to Worldnetdaily what happened next to her and her baby boy, whom she named Rowan:

“His right leg moved. He curled up a bit like he was cold; I screamed for Violene! No one came. I managed to get to the doorway, pants down, blood everywhere and yelled again. I went back to my baby. I heard her say she’d be right there.

I showed her Rowan, told her he was alive and moving and to call 911! She took a quick look, said he’s not moving now and she’d be back to take care of things while walking out. I called her again. I was touching Rowan softly and he moved again. I called her back. Rowan jumped, I think startled by the loud sound of my calling for help. I showed her that he was moving and alive. I begged her to hurry and call 911, now!

She said for me to lie down and she would get her supervisor. No one came.

I continued to try to caress and comfort my son by rubbing his back, tummy and chest. I stroked his precious little head and kept telling him I loved him and we would be OK. I was afraid to move him because I did not want to do anything that might end up hurting him. I pushed my pinky into his little hand and his fingers curled around me. Still no one was coming. I was terrified but trying not to let him know I was scared. I kept telling him what a beautiful son he was and that we were going to be safe soon.”

Here is the 911 call her friend made:

Angele says she then figured out a way to call for help.

Looking into the toilet, Angele immediately regretted her decision to have the abortion. At 22 weeks and five days gestation, the baby, Angele later named, “Rowan” was a perfectly beautiful little boy. Angele stated that abortion clinic employee, Violene dismissed her pleas and walked away, leaving Angele alone with her baby in the bathroom.

In a last ditch effort to save her child’s life, Angele made a frantic call to her friend, who was waiting at a nearby hotel. At 10:22 a.m. and 10:29 a.m., the Orlando Fire Department (OFD) received calls requesting an ambulance to the EPOC Clinic. Here is a portion of the transcript from that 911 call:

Angele’s Friend (AF): It’s a women’s clinic. . . . My friend is having an abortion and the baby was born alive. . . . They’re not allowing her to use the phone there. They’re wanting the baby to die!

OFD: She wants the baby to live?

AF: That’s correct. . . . [She] said the baby was just born and it was alive and they were wanting her to leave it in the toilet and, uh, just let it die, and she’s not wanting that to happen.

According to the OFD’s incident report, Engine 4 (E-4), bearing a paramedic and two EMTs, arrived on the scene at 10:37 a.m. Two police officers also arrived, responding to an OFD call for back-up that said clinic workers wanted “to kill the baby.”

Although the EMTs and paramedics remained on the scene at the EPOC abortion clinic for 22 minutes, they never went into the bathroom to speak with the desperate mother and assess the little infant who was struggling to survive down the hall.

Baby Rowan lived for 11 minutes before perishing in the toilet of the abortion clinic.

“After a few minutes I realized for certain that he was gone. I picked up my son. I held him to my chest. I rocked him and prayed. I could not stop crying,” said Angele. “I felt so bad. I felt so helpless. I had been so wrong to come here … I wanted to fix and change everything once I saw Rowan’s precious little face and body. All we needed was someone to get us to safety,” Angele said.

“He was perfect, slightly pale and a little translucent. His eyebrows were pale but wide and well-defined. You could see little hairs on his face and head. He had the tiniest little fingernails and toenails. I noticed they already had a little bit of growth. His mouth was lovely. He was this perfectly formed one pound, one ounce human being. He was beautiful. He had been so strong.

“I wrapped him in [a] blue pad instead of one of the wet blankets. I just kept kissing him and telling him I loved him so much. I told him I was sorry I couldn’t get anyone to help us and I was so sorry for ever coming here.”

BabyRowan2

Baby Rowan

___________________________________________________________________________________

BABY Left to die on roof of abortion clinic:

Oct. 14, 2008, little Shanice Osbourne was finally be laid to rest 27 months after she was allegedly killed on the day she was aborted alive, July 20, 2006, by abortion clinic owner Belkis Gonzalez at A Gyn Diagnostics Center in Hialeah, Fla.

In addition, notice of intent to initiate a civil lawsuit for medical negligence, wrongful death and personal injury has been filed against Gonzalez, abortionist Pierre Jean-Jacques Renelique and their conglomerate of four Dade County abortion clinics by Pennekamp Law in conjunction with the Thomas More Society.

Finally, some semblance of peace and justice?

On a hot summer day a little over two years ago, Sycloria Williams was in the throes of an induced-labor abortion of 22-week-old Shanice when the baby delivered alive.

A clinic worker, along with Williams, witnessed Gonzalez cut the cord and place the moving, breathing baby in a biohazard bag partially filled with chlorine bleach and zip it shut.

It was that worker who developed a conscience and allegedly called police to report the crime, after which Gonzalez tossed the baby in the bag on top of the mill roof so police couldn’t find her.

For nine days, the baby baked in the Florida sun until Gonzalez, thinking the coast was clear, retrieved her only to have the worker call police again, who this time found the baby. DNA evidence linked Shanice to Sycloria.

And then the case hit a wall because the murder victim had been aborted.

While the Miami-Dade County medical examiner determined Shanice was born alive, he concluded her death was “natural” due to “extreme prematurity,” since no one could know exactly why she died burning, drowning, suffocation, or on her own?

The examiner was clearly biased. If one strangles a dying 2-year-old, one still has committed murder. If one shoots a person midair who has just leapt to her death, one has still committed murder. But if one burns, drowns and suffocates a dying premature aborted baby, the death was natural?

Shanice’s short life and death demonstrate the need for the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. While it was legal to kill Shanice pre-birth, it was “wrongful death” to do so after, even if she wasn’t viable.

Shanice was buried at Queen of Heaven Cemetery in Fort Lauderdale.

_______________________________________________________________________

The Born-Alive Infant Protection Act

The Born-Alive Infant Protection Act was signed into law in 2002. This Act requires doctors and medical staff to treat infants who survive an abortion with dignity and respect. This means that the staff of Orlando Women’s Center must work to keep a baby who survives an abortion alive. They must call 911 and cooperate with emergency medical personnel in providing care for your baby.

HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said in a statement: “Congress had received testimony that some infants who had been born alive after unsuccessful abortions were left to die. … The Act reaffirms the legal principle that all infants born alive are entitled to the full protection of the law. That is a principle I will vigorously uphold as secretary. … We took the first of these educational steps today by notifying relevant entities that we aggressively enforce federal laws that protect born-alive infants. We issued clear guidance that withholding medical care from an infant born alive may constitute a violation of the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act and the Medicare Conditions of Participation.”

The 2002 act established that in all federal laws and regulations, the words “person,” “human being,” “child” and “individual” include “every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.” The law also defines “born alive” as meaning “the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section or induced abortion.”

It’s the LAW! If your baby is born ALIVE, don’t wait …call 911 YOURSELF!

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“In 1959 the UN declared a child needs “legal protection BEFORE” and “after birth.” Yet silent on this,” Ryan Bomberger

Abortion Toilet

Also read: Witness: Planned Parenthood harvests brains from live baby with beating heart by cutting through his face

Abortion patient sees baby during procedure “I saw this red bucket on the floor…” later hospitalized!

2011 YouTube says that her friend’s baby was born alive after the abortion

Posted in After Birth Abortion with tags , , , on July 29, 2013 by saynsumthn

ABORTION CLINIC LED MOM 2 BELIEVE THAT HER BABY WAS SUCCESSFULLY ABORTED, YET BABY WAS ALIVE

A woman who claimed that her friend’s baby was born alive after the abortion has posted a video on youtube. It was an emotional message, “I know a friend of mine several years ago. She herself had an abortion, a two day procedure…” the woman begins.

She described the way her friend “suffered with major labor pains” during the second day.

“However, my friend was not heavily sedated all the way. She did not say anything to the hospital – to the staff- or anybody….Upon the completion of the abortion, she heard the baby cry. The baby was alive, she knew the baby was alive, it was a girl…That’s when she protested, when she heard the baby cry, because she saw a female nurse with glasses.. taking the baby to the table and checking the heartbeat. And then that’s when she started complaining that she wasn’t heavily sedated. That she knew that her daughter was alive and she made up her mind that she wanted to have the baby. And they reassuring her it was the drug making her hallucinate these things. And so they injected more sedative into her I.V….and suffered this thought in her mind for many many years.”

Planned Parenthood supporters sign petition for after birth 4th trimester abortion

Posted in After Birth Abortion, Planned Parenthood After Birth Abortion with tags , , , on July 25, 2013 by saynsumthn

Think AFTER BIRTH ABORTION WON’T HAPPEN- Think AGAIN:

“Rational Design” code word for Genetically Modified Eugenics

Posted in After Birth Abortion, Eugenics, Genetically Modified Humans, Infanticide, Rational design with tags , , , , , , , , , on August 17, 2012 by saynsumthn

On August 16,2012, the UK Telegraph published this article: Genetically engineering ‘ethical’ babies is a moral obligation, says Oxford professor

The claim is simple: Genetically screening our offspring to make them better people is just ‘responsible parenting’, claims an eminent Oxford academic.

Professor Julian Savulescu said that creating so-called designer babies could be considered a “moral obligation” as it makes them grow up into “ethically better children”.

The expert in practical ethics said that we should actively give parents the choice to screen out personality flaws in their children as it meant they were then less likely to “harm themselves and others”.

Savulescu is also editor-in-chief of the Journal of Medical Ethics, made his comments in an article in the latest edition of Reader’s Digest.

Interesting to note, the Journal of Medical Ethics received death threats after they published an article on AFTER BIRTH ABORTIONS. The authors, Alberto Guiblini and Francesca Minerva, of that horrific publication maintain that abnormalities cannot always be detected in a fetus and women cannot choose to abort or not. “A serious philosophical problem arises when the same conditions that would have justified abortion become known after birth. In such cases, we need to assess facts in order to decide whether the same arguments that apply to killing a human fetus can also be consistently applied to killing a newborn human”.

Below is an audio interview of the author about the article on AFTER BIRTH ABORTIONS:

In justifying their publication of the article, the editor of the Journal of Medical Ethics, Julian Savulescu wrote “Many people will and have disagreed with these arguments. However, the goal of the Journal of Medical Ethics is not to present the Truth or promote some one moral view. It is to present well reasoned argument based on widely accepted premises. The authors provocatively argue that there is no moral difference between a fetus and a newborn. Their capacities are relevantly similar. If abortion is permissible, infanticide should be permissible. The authors proceed logically from premises which many people accept to a conclusion that many of those people would reject”.

Back to the RATIONAL DESIGN ARGUMENT:

Savulescu explained that we are now in the middle of a genetic revolution and that although screening, for all but a few conditions, remained illegal it should be welcomed.

He said that science is increasingly discovering that genes have a significant influence on personality – with certain genetic markers in embryo suggesting future characteristics.
By screening in and screening out certain genes in the embryos, it should be possible to influence how a child turns out.

In the end, he said that “rational design” would help lead to a better, more intelligent and less violent society in the future.

“Surely trying to ensure that your children have the best, or a good enough, opportunity for a great life is responsible parenting?” wrote Prof Savulescu, the Uehiro Professor in practical ethics.

“So where genetic selection aims to bring out a trait that clearly benefits an individual and society, we should allow parents the choice.

“To do otherwise is to consign those who come after us to the ball and chain of our squeamishness and irrationality.

“Indeed, when it comes to screening out personality flaws, such as potential alcoholism, psychopathy and disposition to violence, you could argue that people have a moral obligation to select ethically better children.

“They are, after all, less likely to harm themselves and others.”

“If we have the power to intervene in the nature of our offspring — rather than consigning them to the natural lottery — then we should.”

So much can be said about these comments, but calling them MORAL and CHOICES are despicable reasoning for simple EUGENICS !

So what is MORAL Behavior and what personality and character would this professor deem reasonable to breed?

In 1904, Frances Galton who coined the term EUGENICS and was a cousin to Charles Darwin, stated in his writings:
“Persistence in setting forth the national importance of eugenics.”

He said, “There are three stages to be passed through:
(I) It must be made familiar as an academic question, until its exact importance has been understood and accepted as a fact.
(2) It must be recognized as a subject whose practical development deserves serious consideration.
(3) It must be introduced into the national conscience, like a new religion. It has, indeed, strong claims to become an orthodox religious, tenet of the future, for eugenics co-operate with the workings of nature by securing that humanity shall be represented by the fittest races.

Galton then observed that “What nature does blindly, slowly, and ruthlessly, man may do providently, quickly, and kindly. As it lies within his power, so it becomes his duty to work in that direction.” AH…there is that so-called MORAL OBLIGATION AGAIN !

Galton continued,” The improvement of our stock seems to me one of the highest objects that we can reasonably attempt. We are ignorant of the ultimate destinies of humanity, but feel perfectly sure that it is as noble a work to raise its level, in the sense already explained, as it would be disgraceful to abase it.” THERE IS THAT SO-CALLED “rational design”, again !

In 1904, Eugenicist George Bernard Shaw said, “What we must fight for is freedom to breed the race without being hampered by the mass of irrelevant conditions implied in the institution of marriage.”

Theodore Roosevelt, wrote this in a letter to eugenicist Charles Davenport in 1913, hoping that “Someday we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty, of the good citizen of the right type is to leave his or her blood behind him in the world; and that we have no business to permit the perpetuation of citizens of the wrong type.”

The 1917 California amendment, the third sterilization bill in the nation, worded the description of a diagnosis warranting sterilizations from “hereditary insanity or incurable chronic mania or dementia” to a “mental disease which may have been inherited and is likely to be transmitted to descendants.”

At state and local fairs during the 1920s and 1930s, the American Eugenics Society sponsored lectures and exhibits intended to demonstrate principles of heredity and the menace of unchecked breeding among the unfit. “Some people are born to be a burden to the rest” read the signs above their booths. In 1936 the Eugenics Institute listed its activities for the previous year: “the training of SS doctors; racial hygiene training; expert testimony for the Reich Ministry of the Interior on cases of dubious heritage; collecting and classifying skulls from Africa; studies in race crossing; and experimental genetic pathology.” In 1937 Frederick Osborn a founder of the Eugenics Society in America , himself “praised the Nazi eugenic program as the ‘most important experiment which has ever been tried.’”

That was the year after Julian S. Huxley coined this staggering term: Selection through Favourable Variations, when he said, “But in civilized human communities of our present type, the elimination of defect by natural selection is largely (though of course by no means wholly) rendered inoperative by medicine, charity, and the social services; while, as we have seen, there is no selection encouraging favourable variations. The net result is that many deleterious mutations can and do survive, and the tendency to degradation of the germ-plasm can manifest itself.”

So as you can see this professors “ideas” are not new in any way- they are regurgitated evil eugenics at its worst, plain and simple !