Roe V. Wade a Dred Scott decision against the Unborn why do Black Journalists support it?
Our friend, Ryan Bomberger over at The Radiance Foundation blows it out of the park again when he asks a very good question, “WHY DO MOST BLACK MEDIA OUTLETS PRAISE PLANNED PARENTHOOD?”
His latest social media poster reads,“It’s by design. Abortion is the number one killer in the black community, making it certainly worthy of honest investigation and discussion. Yet the nation’s largest collective of journalists, the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ), has failed miserably to take a critical look at the epidemic of abortion in the black community and Planned Parenthood. Many of these “journalists” are recipients of the eugenic organization’s annual Margaret Sanger Award for helping to promote abortion. NABJ events are funded, in part, by Planned Parenthood and only feature pro-abortion perspectives provided by executives of the billion-dollar abortion empire. So, it’s no surprise that “news” articles in most black media outlets simply serve as free ad space for the nation’s largest abortion chain.”
It may be true that today Black Journalists just like other modern day Black “leaders” such as the NAACP and the Congressional Black Caucus have today sold their souls to the eugenics – racist- abortion lobby – but that was not the case in days past. (here)
In fact, many black leaders spoke out and warned their community against the genocidal agenda of abortion.
Among them was one notable journalist who stood his ground in his attempt to expose this evil – and for that he lost his job.
His name was Samuel Yette!
Newsweek’s First Black D.C. Correspondent Samuel F. Yette’s, controversial book “The Choice: The Issue of Black Survival in America” put him in headlines. The book exposed high level attempts of Black Genocide through birth control and abortion.
“The book dealt with things they did not want people to know about at the time,” Yette told the Tennessee Tribune, which he joined as a columnist, in 1996. “There were those well-placed in our government who were determined to have a final solution for the race issue in this country — not unlike Hitler’s ‘Final Solution’ for Jews 50 years earlier in Germany. I wrote this and documented it. It caused the Nixon White House to say to Newsweek in effect, ‘Don’t come back until you are rid of him.’ “
Yette charged that he had become “unacceptable on the scene” as a correspondent for Newsweek as a result of the book, and filed suit, which, he eventually lost.
On 1972, Yette told Jet Magazine, “Newsweek didn’t want anybody Black working in Washington; they didn’t want us to see some of the things that were going on there behind closed doors.”
“I don’t mean to be pejorative or vindictive when I say this,” Yette said at a 1972 news conference, “but had I been a nigger instead of Black, a spy instead of a reporter, a tool instead of a man, I could have stayed at Newsweek indefinitely,” Jet magazine reported.
Even though Samuel Yette was one of the first and very distinguished Black journalists to work for Newsweek, after he published, “The Choice” he was fired by Newsweek. Yette claims his superiors told him that the “Nixon White house” wanted him out of Washington.
In his book, Yette exposed President Nixon’s White House Conference on Food and Nutrition of December 2-4, 1969.
In Yette’s words it, “was worse than a farce.”
President Nixon opened the conference with 3 recommendations designed to reduce the number of hungry people! He suggested no measures for the relief of hunger in America.
1. He wanted everyone to have a guaranteed minimum income of $1,600 a year. (This is less than welfare was paying at that time.)
2. A supposed expansion of the food stamp program that would be tied into and compliment the welfare reform package in #1. (His plan would have actually reduced the amount of food stamps. Less money + less food =more hunger.)
3. Provide family planning services to at minimum 5 million women in low-income families.
This last proposal was part of a plan formulated by Dr. Charles Lowe of the National Institute of Health. The plan recommended Congress pass a law that:
1. Made birth control information and devices available to any and all girls over the age of 13 with or without parental consent.
2. Allowed mandatory abortions for unmarried girls within the 1st three months of pregnancy.
3. Mandatory sterilization for any unmarried girl giving birth out of wedlock for the 2nd time.
Also in his book, Yette describes how civil rights activist, Mrs. Fannie Lou Hamer was at that Conference on hunger. When she heard about the birth control proposals she grabbed about a dozen young black men, walked into the room, and demanded to be heard. She spoke about ten minutes on the evil results of this plan and the conference dropped it from consideration.
THE COVER BLOWN:
According to Samuel Yette, Hamer had a passion for her people and her interest and understanding of how powerful the political process was in America led her and others to create the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party to challenge the Credential Committee in Atlantic City, New Jersey in 1964 to be seated rather than the regular Democrats who they exclaimed were “illegally elected” based on discriminatory practices against blacks statewide. “We Will Not Accept The Compromise”, stated Mrs. Hamer.
Below are exerts of an eye opening incident Ms. Hamer experienced in the realm of Black Genocide written by journalist Samuel Yette :
Mrs. Fannie Lou Hamer was Tough Fighter The Afro American – Apr 2, 1977 By Samuel Yette
“It is still a society in which an injured man must show his ability to pay before getting hospital services, but his daughter or wife can be aborted or fed birth control pills, at public expense…For these and other reasons the recent death of Mrs. Fannie Lou Hamer …was noted here and across the nation not only with personal sadness, but also with stern political reflection.
When the charades of Richard Nixon included a White House Conference on hunger in 1969, Mrs. Hamer was among the hundreds of authentic grass-roots persons brought here to confir with the highly paid experts.
But the conference (whose name was changed from a conference on hunger to a conference on “Food and Nutrition”) was in reality, one great fraud against the poor.
Instead of seeking ways to feed the hungry, the back stage plan was to get the poor unwittingly to endorse a plan to eliminate from the society those who were hungry.
For example, a panel of medical experts pretended to be studying was to insure proper nourishment for babies and pregnant women. Instead it adopted-in the name of the poor at the conference- a resolution providing for:
– Birth Control devices for young girls, free, and with or without parental approval;
– Required abortions of unmarried girls discovered during the first three months of pregnancy; and
– Forced sterilization of any such girl giving birth out of wedlock a second time.
Only one black person-a nurse-was a member of that panel.
Yette continues, In my reportorial role, I found Mrs. Hamer for a reaction to the newly passed resolution.
She responded with shock and outrage at the deception, “I didn’t come to talk about birth control, ” she protested, ” I came here to get some food to feed poor, hungry people, Where are they carrying on that kind of talk?”
Hearing the location of the panel, she gamely pulled herself up on a cane, and made her way to the panel’s meeting room. Along the way she beckoned several black men, who followed seriously intent on doing her will.
She went straight to the front of the room and demanded to be heard.
With the power and conviction of personal tragedy, she told how she, herself, had once been sterilized under the guise of an unrelated surgical procedure. She told how such tools as their resolution in the hands of racist medical personnel would mean tragedy for the black and poor.
Finally, with several large black men at her side, Mrs. Hamer demanded that the resolution be reconsidered. It was, and voted down. But she could not stand and watch forever.
Though she saw the deception and illuminated the society’s most immoral contradictions , she, like the hope and moral vigor of he 1960’s ran out…
Perhaps these “Conversations” with Richard Nixon will explain why he didn’t want Yette to have a sphere of influence. This is an clip from the film: Maafa21 Black Genocide in 21st Century America. The film has more on the Yette story and more history on Black Genocide in America Today ! here http://www.maafa21.com
Samuel Yette once wrote, “Roe V. Wade was a Dred Scott decision against the unborn.”
And he was correct. The infamous Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion on demand, has set back every advancement on person hood that Blacks won from the past.
Maybe that is why Yette went on to state, “It is ironic in the extreme that Black political leadership…sadly failing to remember that the society that condemned Dred Scott as a non-person on one side of the line used the same rationale to condemn him on the other…That is the ugly reality.” ( Afro-American July 19, 1977)
Unlike today’s self-appointed Black spokespersons, Yette remained consistent in his opposition to abortion, and said this at a 1985 conference on Black families, “Any public policy that condones, encourages, or participates in the taking of life on the pre-birth side of the womb, anticipates and works towards the policies and practices and the same rationales that destroy life on the after side of the womb,” ~ Yette, told The Afro American on Jul 13, 1985.
Yette went on to state that “Given the history of the genocidal practices, and public policies impacted on black people in the society, it is barely believable that any significant number of black people at all could condone, much less demand, public policies and financing the destruction of human life on either side of the womb.”
Apparently Yette was wrong!
Samuel Yette’s stand is documented in a powerful documentary called Maafa21. This film is carrying on the message Mr. Yette began- that there are Elite efforts to exterminate the Black race in America.
Below is the trailer: