What’s wrong with Eugenics? asks writer on the Dawkins’ website !

It is no surprise that the proponent of evolution: Richard Dawkins, would have a blog posted on their website: The Richard Dawkins Foundation entitled: “What’s wrong with Eugenics?” .

The author of this ridiculous question asks:

But is Eugenics really that bad? Why are people so afraid of it? After all, we are – every one of us – the product of Eugenics and enjoy its benefits at some level. Did not our parents choose one and not another partner from a vast genetic pool in order to have offspring with? Do we not eat plants and animals that have been genetically selected for?
Who among us does not enjoy the benefits of good foods that have been farmed or genetically selected? We all take medicines intended to improve us in some way? Don’t we all marvel at the great athletes that grace our sports fields, all of whom have undergone performance enhancing training and or drugs of one kind or another? Why do we cheer athletes, even ballet dancers, if not for their genetic prowess?..Can’t we disentangle the Eugenics of scientific racism from that which is already a fact today and move on to create a more intelligent, healthy world of beings and or animals?

Eugenics has it’s foundation in the Theory of evolution. In fact, Charles Darwin whose famous book on evolution was originally entitled: The Origin of Species, by means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life

Just who are the “Favored Races” they want to “Preserve”? Could it be White/Anglo Saxons only?

The man who coined the term “EUGENICS” was Frances Galton- and he was the cousin of Charles Darwin. We see over and again, that when God is left out- it leaves a gap for man to try and control who lives and who dies, who is allowed to “Breed” and who is not.

What the writer above leaves out is that we are today in fact, promoting and using EUGENICS in the Population Control/Family Planning/ Abortion mentality. In fact, the founder of the nation’s largest abortion provider: Planned Parenthood (Margaret Sanger) was a member of the American Eugenics Society. Sanger wrote quite extensively about eugenics, it was built into the Planned Parenthood philosophy. Some on Sanger’s board and some she admired corresponded with Adolf Hitler. In fact, many of the eugenics proponents of the USA did this. Hitler called Madison Grant’s ( A eugenics founder) Book – The Passing of the Great Race– His Bible. Others like Sanger’s predecessor to Planned Parenthood: The American Birth Control League Board Member: Lothrop Stoddard met with Hitler to observe His eugenics Courts. He described this meeting in his book: Into the Darkness: A Sympathetic Report from Hitler’s Wartime Reich. In addition to Stoddard, Sanger allowed racists, pro-eugenics, pro-Nazis to write in her publication the Birth Control Review.

These Are exerts from the powerful documentary: Maafa21 Black Genocide in 21st Century America which prove my point:

Go to 8Minutes to begin Nazi / Hitler/ African section:

There is a problem in my view with MAN deciding as the writer asks, “to create a more intelligent, healthy world of beings and or animals?” Just who will make such decisions and where will they lead. With the American Eugenics Movement- they left many blacks and poor whites sterilized against their will. In Germany, the eugenics movement left millions of people in Concentration camps or murdered in gas chambers.

Here in America, we find that this type of killing was celebrated by the American Eugenics Movement. In this clip from the 2008 film “The Soviet Story“, we see that George Bernard Shaw, the celebrated progressive playwright defended Hitler, advocated killing those who can’t justify their existence and called for the development of lethal gas 10 years before the national socialists in Germany did exactly that.

George Bernard Shaw was one of the left’s most revered figures and the only person besides Al Gore to win both an Oscar and a Nobel prize.

George Bernard Shaw, I don’t want to punish anybody, but there are an extraordinary number of people who I might want to kill…I think it would be a good thing to make everybody come before a properly appointed board just as he might come before the income tax commissioner and say every 5 years or every 7 years…just put them there and say , ‘Sir or madam will you be kind enough to justify your existence…if you’re not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little bit more then clearly we cannot use the big organization of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive. Because your life does not benefit us and it can’t be of very much use to yourself.’

Shaw wrote, “ I appeal to the chemists to discover a humane gas that will kill instantly and painlessly. In short- a gentlemanly gas deadly by all means, but humane, not cruel.”

Interviewed on Germany Shaw declared:
“Germany’s contention of ‘race pollution’ was ‘despicably unscientific.'” But he said he “appreciated” Hitler’s political sagacity and the courage with which he has rescued Germany from the gutter,, and placed her once more at the head of Central Europe.”
( SOURCE: GEORGE BERNARD SHAW Approaches His 82d Birthday Anemic But Still Vociferously Aware of His OwnJJnique. Significance, Galveston Daily News: 7/24/1938)

It is important to note that George Bernard Shaw was a Eugenicist who supported Planned Parenthood Founder, and eugenicist Margaret Sanger and others in the eugenics movement.

What many people do not know is that Shaw was a contributor to Planned Parenthood Founder, Margaret Sanger’s “Birth Control Review”.

Shaw endorsed Sanger, Birth Control, and EUGENICS..

In the June 1929 Birth Control Review, George Bernard Shaw supports Sanger’s efforts to promote birth control when he, ” We are up against an overpopulation problem created by Capitalism…Socialists say quite truly that Socialism can get rid of it…But it cannot wait for Socialism…”

In Margaret Sanger’s Autobiography, Sanger writes, ” Jane had lnvited literary luminaries and their wives George Bernard Shaw, Arnold Bennett, Sir Arbuthnot Lane, Professor E W MacBride of the Eugenics Education Society, Walter Salter of the League of Nations, and Lord Buckmaster.

It had been my experience that personages gave little of themselves on formal occasions So many people expected these lions to roar bravely, forgetting that they preferred to save their sparkling sallies for the pages of their books.”

Sanger continues, “I was back In New York by the end of October, and soon came a letter from Shaw cheering me w~th his point of view.”

Sanger reads the letter from George Bernard Shaw and says Shaw compares the “more evolved people” or “White Elitists” to “lower classes who need to be taught to control their populations calling them “amoeba” ,

Birth control should be advocated for its own sake, on the general
ground that the difference between voluntary, irrational, uncontrolled activity IS the difference between an amoeba and a man, and if we really believe that the more highly evolved creature is the better we may as well act accordingly. As the amoeba does not understand birth control, it cannot abuse it, and therefore its state may be the more
gracious, but it is also true that as the amoeba cannot write, it cannot commit forgery yet we teach everybody to write unhesitatingly, knowing that if we refuse to teach anything that could be abused we should never teach anything at all
.’

Margaret Sanger Autobiography Pages 371-372

The quote above by Shaw regarding the requirement that people go before a “board” was promoted by Margaret Sanger and The American Eugenics Society. Many people were forcefully sterilized by these “Eugenic Boards” and also that some of them were referred to these boards by Planned Parenthood. (Maafa21)

Margaret Sanger, called for parents she deemed of lower than her to have a QUOTE: LICENSE TO BREED. She wanted all would be parents to go before her eugenic boards to request a “PERMIT TO BREED“.

Sanger also called for those who were poor and what she considered to be “morons‘ , etc to be shipped to colonies where they would live in “Farms and Open Spaces” dedicated to brainwashing these so-called “inferior types” into having what Sanger called, “Better moral conduct”.

Sanger Farms and Open Spaces

Eugenics in America was and remains evil and the proof is slowly getting out to reveal the victims of this bad ideology:

If they couldn’t sterilize the “unfit” voluntarily they would resort to force…as Maafa21 again points out:

I say that those promoting Eugenics have a Racist and evil agenda and we should never imply that such an evil act can be “GOOD” as the write on Dawkin’s Blog did. To answer the question “What wrong with Eugenics” EVERYTHING!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: